본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Outcomes of Cephalomedullary Nailing in Basicervical Fracture

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: A basicervical femoral fracture is defined as a fracture of base of neck of femur that occurs medially from intertrochanteric line above lesser trochanter. In this study, we intended to evaluate radiological and clinical results of basicervical femoral fractures treated by intramedullary nailing. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients, who underwent intramedullary nailing among 50 patients, out of 50 who were diagnosed with basicervical femoral fractures from July 2012 to May 2015 were studied. All of 15 patients’ fracture were two-part basicervical fractures. Using radiography, we characterized the: i) state of reduction, ii) location of the lag screw, iii) tip apex distance (TAD), and iv) sliding distance of lag screw and bone union. Additionally, we performed clinical assessment before injury and at final follow-up. Results: In radiological assessment, we achieved acceptable reduction state in all patients. All lag screws were fixated on appropriate locations. Mean TAD was 17.3 mm (11.0-21.1 mm), which showed insertion point of <25 mm in all cases. The mean sliding distance of the lag screw was 5.1 mm (0.1-16.0 mm) at the final follow-up. The mean bone union period was 4.8 months (3-10 months) with achieving in all cases. In clinical assessment, Harris hip score, visual analogue scale score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score, all of them significantly improved postoperatively compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05). Conclusion: In elderly patients with basicervical femoral fractures, treatment with intramedullary nailing showed satisfactory results, considered to be a useful method if performed with skilled technique.

Abstract

Purpose: A basicervical femoral fracture is defined as a fracture of base of neck of femur that occurs medially from intertrochanteric line above lesser trochanter. In this study, we intended to evaluate radiological and clinical results of basicervical femoral fractures treated by intramedullary nailing. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients, who underwent intramedullary nailing among 50 patients, out of 50 who were diagnosed with basicervical femoral fractures from July 2012 to May 2015 were studied. All of 15 patients’ fracture were two-part basicervical fractures. Using radiography, we characterized the: i) state of reduction, ii) location of the lag screw, iii) tip apex distance (TAD), and iv) sliding distance of lag screw and bone union. Additionally, we performed clinical assessment before injury and at final follow-up. Results: In radiological assessment, we achieved acceptable reduction state in all patients. All lag screws were fixated on appropriate locations. Mean TAD was 17.3 mm (11.0-21.1 mm), which showed insertion point of <25 mm in all cases. The mean sliding distance of the lag screw was 5.1 mm (0.1-16.0 mm) at the final follow-up. The mean bone union period was 4.8 months (3-10 months) with achieving in all cases. In clinical assessment, Harris hip score, visual analogue scale score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score, all of them significantly improved postoperatively compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05). Conclusion: In elderly patients with basicervical femoral fractures, treatment with intramedullary nailing showed satisfactory results, considered to be a useful method if performed with skilled technique.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Lieberman JR, "AAOS comprehensive orthopaedic review", pp.597~598 (2009), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
  2. Saarenpää I, "Basicervical fracture--a rare type of hip fracture", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 122, pp.69~72 (2002)
  3. Blair B, "Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (306), pp.256~263 (1994)
  4. Deneka DA, "Biomechanical comparison of internal fixation techniques for the treatment of unstable basicervical femoral neck fractures", J Orthop Trauma, 11, pp.337~343 (1997)
  5. Dossick PH, "Techniques for preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation of noncemented hip arthroplasty", Tech Orthop, 6(3), pp.1~6 (1991)
  6. Parker MJ, "Handbook of hip fracture surgery", pp.63~90 (1997), Butterworth-Heinemann
  7. Kim KW, "Elderly trochanteric fractures: principles of treatment", J Korean Soc Fract, 7, pp.227~234 (1994)
  8. 윤의성, "고령의 불안정성 대퇴골 전자간 골절에서의 일차적 양극성 반 인공관절 치환술과 압박고 나사의 비교", 대한골절학회지, 17(3), pp.214~220 (2004), 대한골절학회
  9. Gill JM, "Biomechanical aspects of the repair of intertrochanteric fractures", J Biomed Eng, 11, pp.235~239 (1989)
  10. Ly TV, "Management of femoral neck fractures in young adults", Indian J Orthop, 42, pp.3~12 (2008)
  11. Jones HW, "Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24studies involving 3,279 fractures", Int Orthop, 30, pp.69~78 (2006)
  12. Parker MJ, "Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (3), pp.CD000093~ (2008)
  13. Hu SJ, "Surgical treatment of basicervical intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with cephalomeduallary hip nails", Orthop Surg, 5, pp.124~129 (2013)
  14. Tasyikan L, "Short-term results of surgical treatment with cephalomedullary nails for basicervical proximal femoral fractures", Acta Orthop Belg, 81, pp.427~434 (2015)
  15. Fogagnolo F, "Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AOASIF proximal femoral nail", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 124, pp.31~37 (2004)
  16. Cleveland M, "A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 41-A, pp.1399~1408 (1959)
  17. Baumgaertner MR, "The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 77, pp.1058~1064 (1995)
  18. Koval KJ, "Ambulatory ability after hip fracture. A prospective study in geriatric patients", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (310), pp.150~159 (1995)
  19. Koval KJ, "Functional recovery after fracture of the hip", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 76, pp.751~758 (1994)
  20. Su BW, "Basicervical versus intertrochanteric fractures: an analysis of radiographic and functional outcomes", Orthopedics, 29, pp.919~925 (2006)
  21. Watson ST, "Outcomes of low-energy basicervical proximal femoral fractures treated with cephalomedullary fixation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 98, pp.1097~1102 (2016)
  22. Skála-Rosenbaum J, "Is distal locking with IMHN necessary in every pertrochanteric fracture?", Int Orthop, 34, pp.1041~1047 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)