Review on Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture: Definition, Treatments, and Failures
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Basicervical femoral neck fracture is an uncommon fracture that accounts for only 1.8% of all proximal femoral fractures. Previous studies have recommended that the choice of implant to treat this fracture should be similar to that of intertrochanteric fracture. However, in previous studies on basicervical fractures, the definition and treatment results of these fractures were different, and there were also debates on the implant that had to be used. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to review the studies that performed surgical treatment of basicervical femoral fractures and to assess the definition of basicervical fracture, the use of implants, and failure rates and clinical results. Study selection was based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) treatment outcome for basicervical femoral neck fracture was reported; and (2) dynamic hip screw, proximal femoral nail, or multiple screw fixation was used as treatment. PubMed Central, OVID MEDLINE, Cochrane Collaboration Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, and AHRQ databases were searched to identify relevant studies published up to March, 2020 with English language restriction. A total of 15 studies were included in this study. Differences were found in the definition of basicervical fracture, treatment results, rehabilitation protocol, and fixation failure rate. Definitions and treatment methods for basicervical fractures varied, and treatment outcomes also differed among the enrolled studies. Further research is needed that would be restricted to those fractures that conform to the definition of basicervical fracture.
Abstract
Basicervical femoral neck fracture is an uncommon fracture that accounts for only 1.8% of all proximal femoral fractures. Previous studies have recommended that the choice of implant to treat this fracture should be similar to that of intertrochanteric fracture. However, in previous studies on basicervical fractures, the definition and treatment results of these fractures were different, and there were also debates on the implant that had to be used. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to review the studies that performed surgical treatment of basicervical femoral fractures and to assess the definition of basicervical fracture, the use of implants, and failure rates and clinical results. Study selection was based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) treatment outcome for basicervical femoral neck fracture was reported; and (2) dynamic hip screw, proximal femoral nail, or multiple screw fixation was used as treatment. PubMed Central, OVID MEDLINE, Cochrane Collaboration Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, and AHRQ databases were searched to identify relevant studies published up to March, 2020 with English language restriction. A total of 15 studies were included in this study. Differences were found in the definition of basicervical fracture, treatment results, rehabilitation protocol, and fixation failure rate. Definitions and treatment methods for basicervical fractures varied, and treatment outcomes also differed among the enrolled studies. Further research is needed that would be restricted to those fractures that conform to the definition of basicervical fracture.
참고문헌 (28)
- Chen CY, "Surgical treatment of basicervical fractures of femur--a prospective evaluation of 269 patients", J Trauma, 64, pp.427~429 (2008)
- Blair B, "Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3internal fixation techniques", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (306), pp.256~263 (1994)
- Massoud EI, "Fixation of basicervical and related fractures", Int Orthop, 34, pp.577~582 (2010)
- Imren Y, "Biomechanical comparison of dynamic hip screw, proximal femoral nail, cannulated screw, and monoaxial external fixation in the treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures", Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 82, pp.140~144 (2015)
- Higgins JP, "Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses", BMJ, 327, pp.557~560 (2003)
- Stang A, "Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses", Eur J Epidemiol, 25, pp.603~605 (2010)
- Watson ST, "Outcomes of low-energy basicervical proximal femoral fractures treated with cephalomedullary fixation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 98, pp.1097~1102 (2016)
- Hu SJ, "Surgical treatment of basicervical intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with cephalomeduallary hip nails", Orthop Surg, 5, pp.124~129 (2013)
- TasyIkan L, "Short-term results of surgical treatment with cephalomedullary nails for basicervical proximal femoral fractures", Acta Orthop Belg, 81, pp.427~434 (2015)
- Saarenpää I, "Basicervical fracture--a rare type of hip fracture", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 122, pp.69~72 (2002)
- Su BW, "Basicervical versus intertrochanteric fractures : an analysis of radiographic and functional outcomes", Orthopedics, 29, pp.919~925 (2006)
- Davis TR, "Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 72, pp.26~31 (1990)
- Kuokkanen HO, "Treatment options for basicervical fractures of the femoral neck. A clinical follow-up", Acta Orthop Belg, 57, pp.162~168 (1991)
- 권석현, "Outcomes of Cephalomedullary Nailing in Basicervical Fracture", Hip and Pelvis, 29(4), pp.270~276 (2017), 대한고관절학회[DOI]
- Lee YK, "Risk factors of fixation failure in basicervical femoral neck fracture: which device is optimal for fixation?", Injury, 49, pp.691~696 (2018)
- Guo J, "Treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation", J Int Med Res, 47, pp.4333~4343 (2019)
- Wang Q, "Management of low-energy basicervical proximal femoral fractures by proximal femoral nail anti-rotation", Orthop Surg, 11, pp.1173~1179 (2019)
- Kim JT, "Single screw type of lag screw results higher reoperation rate in the osteosynthesis of basicervical hip fracture", J Orthop Sci, 25, pp.152~155 (2020)
- Yoo J, "Gamma 3 U-Blade lag screws in patients with trochanteric femur fractures: are rotation control lag screws better than others?", J Orthop Surg Res, 14, pp.440~ (2019)
- Deneka DA, "Biomechanical comparison of internal fixation techniques for the treatment of unstable basicervical femoral neck fractures", J Orthop Trauma, 11, pp.337~343 (1997)
- Kyle RF, "Analysis of six hundred and twenty-two intertrochanteric hip fractures", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 61, pp.216~221 (1979)
- Swiontkowski MF, "Intracapsular fractures of the hip", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 76, pp.129~138 (1994)
- Pervez H, "Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur : a study of the reliability of current systems", Injury, 33, pp.713~715 (2002)
- Jensen JS, "Classification of trochanteric fractures", Acta Orthop Scand, 51, pp.803~810 (1980)
- Shoda E, "Proposal of new classification of femoral trochanteric fracture by three-dimensional computed tomography and relationship to usual plain X-ray classification", J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong), 25 (2017)
- Ly TV, "Management of femoral neck fractures in young adults", Indian J Orthop, 42, pp.3~12 (2008)
- Smith FB, "Effects of rotatory and valgus malpositions on blood supply to the femoral head; observations at arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 41, pp.800~815 (1959)
- Ort PJ, "Treatment of femoral neck fractures with a sliding compression screw and two Knowles pins", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (190), pp.158~162 (1984)