본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Relationships between Femoral Offset Change and Clinical Score following Bipolar Hip Arthroplasty in Femoral Neck Fractures

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between femoral offset (FO) and clinical outcomes of patients with femoral neck fracture following bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA). Materials and Methods: Records for a total of 520 patients who underwent BHA for a femoral neck fracture between December 1, 2003, and September 30, 2018, were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with unclear medical records, a congenital deformity and preoperative trauma history of the hip, high-energy multiple trauma, or a history of neurodegenerative disease or cerebrovascular disease were excluded. The remaining 77 patients included in the analysis had a minimum follow-up period of one year. For clinical assessment, the postoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris hip score (HHS) were analyzed at each follow-up period. For radiological assessment, the difference in leg length discrepancy (LLD) and FO were measured. Results: The difference in mean FO postoperatively was 6.7±4.8 mm, and the difference in mean postoperative LLD was 4.9±3.4 mm. The mean HHS was 77.1±7.7, 82.3±8.6, 83.4±7.7, and 86.4±6.7 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative, respectively. The correlation coefficient between FO and HHS in 1-year follow-up was –0.38, and a statistically significant outcome was found (P=0.001). For the HHS domain, the correlation coefficient for function at 1-year follow-up was –0.42, revealing a statistically significant outcome (P=0.0001). Conclusion: There was a statistically significant correlation between clinical outcomes and FO difference at 1 year after BHA in patients over 65 years of age with femoral neck fractures.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between femoral offset (FO) and clinical outcomes of patients with femoral neck fracture following bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA). Materials and Methods: Records for a total of 520 patients who underwent BHA for a femoral neck fracture between December 1, 2003, and September 30, 2018, were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with unclear medical records, a congenital deformity and preoperative trauma history of the hip, high-energy multiple trauma, or a history of neurodegenerative disease or cerebrovascular disease were excluded. The remaining 77 patients included in the analysis had a minimum follow-up period of one year. For clinical assessment, the postoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris hip score (HHS) were analyzed at each follow-up period. For radiological assessment, the difference in leg length discrepancy (LLD) and FO were measured. Results: The difference in mean FO postoperatively was 6.7±4.8 mm, and the difference in mean postoperative LLD was 4.9±3.4 mm. The mean HHS was 77.1±7.7, 82.3±8.6, 83.4±7.7, and 86.4±6.7 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative, respectively. The correlation coefficient between FO and HHS in 1-year follow-up was –0.38, and a statistically significant outcome was found (P=0.001). For the HHS domain, the correlation coefficient for function at 1-year follow-up was –0.42, revealing a statistically significant outcome (P=0.0001). Conclusion: There was a statistically significant correlation between clinical outcomes and FO difference at 1 year after BHA in patients over 65 years of age with femoral neck fractures.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Kanis JA, "A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide", Osteoporos Int, 23, pp.2239~2256 (2012)
  2. Bhandari M, "Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87, pp.2122~2130 (2005)
  3. Burgers PT, "Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly : a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials", Int Orthop, 36, pp.1549~1560 (2012)
  4. Ullmark G, "Femoral head fractures: hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty?", Hip Int, 24(Suppl 10), pp.e12~e14 (2014)
  5. Hopley C, "Primary total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older patients: systematic review", BMJ, 340, pp.c2332~ (2010)
  6. Lecerf G, "Femoral offset : anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 95, pp.210~219 (2009)
  7. Flecher X, "Lower limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 102(1 Suppl), pp.S9~S20 (2016)
  8. Mahmood SS, "2 Sayed-Noor AS. Association between changes in global femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty and function, quality of life, and abductor muscle strength. A prospective cohort study of 22 patients", Acta Orthop, 87, pp.36~41 (2016)
  9. Bjørdal F, "The role of femoral offset and abductor lever arm in total hip arthroplasty", J Orthop Traumatol, 16, pp.325~330 (2015)
  10. De Fine M, "Is there a role for femoral offset restoration during total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 103, pp.349~355 (2017)
  11. Sariali E, "The effect of femoral offset modification on gait after total hip arthroplasty", Acta Orthop, 85, pp.123~127 (2014)
  12. Bae YJ, "Roentgenographic study on shape and size of the femoral head of normal Korean adults", J Korean Orthop Assoc, 30, pp.607~611 (1995)
  13. Merle C, "Femoral offset is underestimated on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis but accurately assessed on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 94, pp.477~482 (2012)
  14. Weber M, "Plain radiographs fail to reflect femoral offset in total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.1661~1665 (2014)
  15. Pasquier G, "Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement : is CT scan the most accurate option", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 96, pp.367~375 (2010)
  16. Lechler P, "The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs", Acta Orthop, 85, pp.389~395 (2014)
  17. Batemann JE, "Single-assembly total hip prosthesis; preliminary report", Orthop Digest, 2, pp.15~22 (1974)
  18. Giuberty RP, "A new concept of a bipolar endoprosthesis", Orthop Rev, 3, pp.40~45 (1974)
  19. Rösler A, "Dementia as a cofactor for geriatric rehabilitation-outcome in patients with osteosynthesis of the proximal femur : a retrospective, matched-pair analysis of 250 patients", Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 49, pp.e36~e39 (2009)
  20. Mahomed NN, "The Harris hip score : comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment", J Arthroplasty, 16, pp.575~580 (2001)
  21. Ji HM, "Does femoral offset recover and affect the functional outcome of patients with displaced femoral neck fracture following hemiarthroplasty", Injury, 48, pp.1170~1174 (2017)
  22. Buecking B, "Functional implications of femoral offset following hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture", Int Orthop, 40, pp.1515~1521 (2016)
  23. Lakstein D, "Does restoration of leg length and femoral offset play a role in functional outcome one year after hip hemiarthroplasty", Injury, 48, pp.1589~1593 (2017)
  24. Hartel M, "Restoration of hip architecture with bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the elderly : does it affect early functional outcome", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 134, pp.31~38 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)