Megaprosthesis Reconstruction of the Proximal Femur following Bone Tumour Resection: When Do We Need the Cup?
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Reconstruction of the proximal femur after tumour resection can be performed with proximal femoral endopros-theses (PFE). Many studies have reported that bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) reduce the risk of dislocation after oncological resections. However, progressive cotyloiditis which might require acetabular resurfacing (total hip arthroplasty [THA]) has been reported. The aim of this study is to compare the results of BHA and THA after proximal femur resection. Materials and Methods: A total of 104 consecutive patients affected by primary (n=52) and metastatic (n=52) bone tumours were included. Ninety patients underwent BHA and 14 patients underwent THA. Complications were recorded and classified according to the Henderson classification. At final follow-up, patients with the implant in site were functionally evaluated with modified Harris hip score (HHS). Results: The mean follow-up was 50 months (range, 2-171 months). Twenty-four (23.1%) patients developed major complications. Eleven (12.2%) BHA required acetabular resurfacing. Patients affected by primary bone tumours showed an increased risk of THA conversion (P=0.042). A reduced risk was observed in patients younger than 35 years (P=0.043) and in those older than 65 years (P=0.033). Dislocation occurred in four case (3.8%), in particular after THA (P=0.021). At final follow-up, 93 patients had the prosthesis in site (80 BHA and 13 THA). Mean postoperative HHS was 70 (range, 30-90). Conclusion: The risk of dislocation is lower for bipolar endoprosthesis compared to THA. However cotyloiditis and acetabular resurfacing might occurred.
Abstract
Purpose: Reconstruction of the proximal femur after tumour resection can be performed with proximal femoral endopros-theses (PFE). Many studies have reported that bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) reduce the risk of dislocation after oncological resections. However, progressive cotyloiditis which might require acetabular resurfacing (total hip arthroplasty [THA]) has been reported. The aim of this study is to compare the results of BHA and THA after proximal femur resection. Materials and Methods: A total of 104 consecutive patients affected by primary (n=52) and metastatic (n=52) bone tumours were included. Ninety patients underwent BHA and 14 patients underwent THA. Complications were recorded and classified according to the Henderson classification. At final follow-up, patients with the implant in site were functionally evaluated with modified Harris hip score (HHS). Results: The mean follow-up was 50 months (range, 2-171 months). Twenty-four (23.1%) patients developed major complications. Eleven (12.2%) BHA required acetabular resurfacing. Patients affected by primary bone tumours showed an increased risk of THA conversion (P=0.042). A reduced risk was observed in patients younger than 35 years (P=0.043) and in those older than 65 years (P=0.033). Dislocation occurred in four case (3.8%), in particular after THA (P=0.021). At final follow-up, 93 patients had the prosthesis in site (80 BHA and 13 THA). Mean postoperative HHS was 70 (range, 30-90). Conclusion: The risk of dislocation is lower for bipolar endoprosthesis compared to THA. However cotyloiditis and acetabular resurfacing might occurred.
참고문헌 (22)
- Cannon CP, "Acetabular outcome after hip hemiarthroplasty in patients with tumors", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 457, pp.183~187 (2007)
- Jamshidi K, "Bipolar hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in allograftprosthesis composite reconstruction of the proximal femur following primary bone tumour resection", Bone Joint J., 102-B, pp.524~529 (2020)
- Farid Y, "Endoprosthetic and allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal femur for bone neoplasms", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 442, pp.223~229 (2006)
- Henderson ER, "The stability of the hip after the use of a proximal femoral endoprosthesis for oncological indications: analysis of variables relating to the patient and the surgical technique", Bone Joint J, 99-B, pp.531~537 (2017)
- Thambapillary S, "Implant longevity, complications and functional outcome following proximal femoral arthroplasty for musculoskeletal tumors : a systematic review", J Arthroplasty, 28, pp.1381~1385 (2013)
- Drexler M, "The radiological evaluation of the hip joint after prosthetic arthroplasty of the proximal femur in patients with a tumour using a bipolar femoral head", Bone Joint J., 97-B, pp.1704~1709 (2015)
- Stevenson JD, "Hemiarthroplasty proximal femoral endoprostheses following tumour reconstruction:is acetabular replacement necessary?", Bone Joint J., 100-B, pp.101~108 (2018)
- Potter BK, "Endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement : metastatic versus primary tumors", Surg Oncol, 18, pp.343~349 (2009)
- Donati D, "Modular prosthetic replacement of the proximal femur after resection of a bone tumour a long-term follow-up", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 83, pp.1156~1160 (2001)
- Finstein JL, "Bipolar proximal femoral replacement prostheses for musculoskeletal neoplasms", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 459, pp.66~75 (2007)
- Ogilvie CM, "Functional outcome of endoprosthetic proximal femoral replacement", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (426), pp.44~48 (2004)
- Puchner SE, "Incidence and management of hip dislocation in tumour patients with a modular prosthesis of the proximal femur", Int Orthop, 38, pp.1677~1684 (2014)
- Bernthal NM, "How long do endoprosthetic reconstructions for proximal femoral tumors last?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, pp.2867~2874 (2010)
- Menendez LR, "Endoprosthetic reconstruction for neoplasms of the proximal femur", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 450, pp.46~51 (2006)
- Henderson ER, "Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses : retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93, pp.418~429 (2011)
- Harris WH, "Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 51, pp.737~755 (1969)
- Dalldorf PG, "Rate of degeneration of human acetabular cartilage after hemiarthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 77, pp.877~882 (1995)[DOI]
- Henderson ER, "Classification of failure of limb salvage after reconstructive surgery for bone tumours: a modified system Including biological and expandable reconstructions", Bone Joint J., 96-B, pp.1436~1440 (2014)
- Chandrasekar CR, "Unipolar proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for tumour : the risk of revision in young patients", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91, pp.401~404 (2009)
- Nich C, "Do dualmobility cups reduce the risk of dislocation in total hip arthroplasty for fractured neck of femur in patients aged older than 75 years", J Arthroplasty, 31, pp.1256~1260 (2016)
- De Martino I, "Dual mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty", World J Orthop, 5, pp.180~187 (2014)
- Schroeder K, "Long-term results of hip arthroplasty in ambulatory patients with cerebral palsy", Int Orthop, 34, pp.335~339 (2010)