Implementing a Sepsis Resuscitation Bundle Improved Clinical Outcome: A Before-and-After Study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Unlike other diseases, the management of sepsis has not been fully integrated in our daily practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether repeated training could improve compliance with a 6-h resuscitation bundle in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Methods: Repeated education regarding a sepsis bundle was provided to the intensive care unit and emergency department residents, nurses, and faculties in a single university hospital. The educational program was led by a multidisciplinary team. A total of 175 adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock were identified (88 before and 87 after the educational program). Hemodynamic resuscitation bundle and timely antibiotics administration were measured for all cases and mortality at 28 days after sepsis diagnosis was evaluated. Results: The compliance rate for the sepsis resuscitation bundle before the educational program was poor (0%), and repeated training improved it to 80% (p < 0.001). The 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the intervention group (16% vs. 32%, p = 0.040). Within the intervention group, patients for whom the resuscitation bundle was successfully completed had a significantly lower 28-day mortality than other patients (11% vs. 41%, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Repeated education led by a multidisciplinary team and interdisciplinary communication improved the compliance rate of the 6-h resuscitation bundle in severe sepsis and septic shock patients. Compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle was associated with improved 28-day mortality in the study population.
Abstract
Background: Unlike other diseases, the management of sepsis has not been fully integrated in our daily practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether repeated training could improve compliance with a 6-h resuscitation bundle in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Methods: Repeated education regarding a sepsis bundle was provided to the intensive care unit and emergency department residents, nurses, and faculties in a single university hospital. The educational program was led by a multidisciplinary team. A total of 175 adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock were identified (88 before and 87 after the educational program). Hemodynamic resuscitation bundle and timely antibiotics administration were measured for all cases and mortality at 28 days after sepsis diagnosis was evaluated. Results: The compliance rate for the sepsis resuscitation bundle before the educational program was poor (0%), and repeated training improved it to 80% (p < 0.001). The 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the intervention group (16% vs. 32%, p = 0.040). Within the intervention group, patients for whom the resuscitation bundle was successfully completed had a significantly lower 28-day mortality than other patients (11% vs. 41%, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Repeated education led by a multidisciplinary team and interdisciplinary communication improved the compliance rate of the 6-h resuscitation bundle in severe sepsis and septic shock patients. Compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle was associated with improved 28-day mortality in the study population.
참고문헌 (24)
- Brun-Buisson C, "Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. A multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. French ICU Group for Severe Sepsis", JAMA, 274, pp.968~974 (1995)
- Guidet B, "CUB-Réa Study Group: Incidence and impact of organ dysfunctions associated with sepsis", Chest, 127, pp.942~951 (2005)
- Dellinger RP, "Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock:2012", Crit Care Med, 41, pp.580~637 (2013)
- Gao F, "The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study", Crit Care, 9, pp.R764~R770 (2005)
- Kortgen A, "Implementation of an evidence-based "standard operating procedure" and outcome in septic shock", Crit Care Med, 34, pp.943~949 (2006)
- Micek ST, "Before-after study of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock", Crit Care Med, 34, pp.2707~2713 (2006)
- Nguyen HB, "Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality", Crit Care Med, 35, pp.1105~1112 (2007)
- Rivers E, "Implementation of an evidence-based "standard operating procedure" and outcome in septic shock: what a sepsis pilot must consider before taking flight with your next patient", Crit Care Med, 34, pp.1247~ (2006)
- Trzeciak S, "Translating research to clinical practice:a 1-year experience with implementing early goal-directed therapy for septic shock in the emergency department", Chest, 129, pp.225~232 (2006)
- Ferrer R, "Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain", JAMA, 299, pp.2294~2303 (2008)
- Vincent JL, "The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction", failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, 1996, pp.22, 707~710
- Bone RC, "Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP", SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians, Chest, pp.2009, 136(5 Suppl)[DOI]
- Dellinger RP, "Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock", Crit Care Med, 32, pp.858~873 (2004)
- De Miguel-Yanes JM, "Failure to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines for sepsis at the ED", Am J Emerg Med, 24, pp.553~559 (2006)
- Chen YC, "The impact of nationwide education program on clinical practice in sepsis care and mortality of severe sepsis: a population-based study in Taiwan", PLoS One, 8, pp.e77414~ (2013)
- Paes BA, "Changing physicians' behavior using combined strategies and an evidence-based protocol", Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 148, pp.1277~1280 (1994)
- Gray J, "Changing physician prescribing behaviour", Can J Clin Pharmacol, 13, pp.e81~e84 (2006)
- Davis D, "Impact of formal continuing medical education:do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?", JAMA, 282, pp.867~874 (1999)
- Davis DA, "Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies", JAMA, 274, pp.700~705 (1995)
- 신형진, "패혈성 쇼크 환자에서 응급실 기반 조기목표지향치료의 효과(중증 패혈증 캠페인)", 대한중환자의학회지, 25(2), pp.61~70 (2010), 대한중환자의학회
- De Miguel-Yanes JM, "Implementation of a bundle of actions to improve adherence to the surviving sepsis campaign guidelines at the ED", Am J Emerg Med, 27, pp.668~674 (2009)
- Rivers E, "Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock", N Engl J Med, 345, pp.1368~1377 (2001)
- Lauzier F, "Vasopressin or norepinephrine in early hyperdynamic septic shock: a randomized clinical trial", Intensive Care Med, 32, pp.1782~1789 (2006)
- Sharshar T, "Circulating vasopressin levels in septic shock", Crit Care Med, 31, pp.1752~1758 (2003)