The Best Prediction Model for Trauma Outcomes of the Current Korean Population: a Comparative Study of Three Injury Severity Scoring Systems
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Injury severity scoring systems that quantify and predict trauma outcomes have not been established in Korea. This study was designed to determine the best system for use in the Korean trauma population. Methods: We collected and analyzed the data from trauma patients admitted to our institution from January 2010 to December 2014. Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) were calculated based on the data from the enrolled patients. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the prediction ability of each scoring system was obtained, and a pairwise comparison of ROC curves was performed. Additionally, the cut-off values were estimated to predict mortality, and the corresponding accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were obtained. Results: A total of 7,120 trauma patients (6,668 blunt and 452 penetrating injuries) were enrolled in this study. The AUCs of ISS, RTS, and TRISS were 0.866, 0.894, and 0.942, respectively, and the prediction ability of the TRISS was significantly better than the others (p < 0.001, respectively). The cut-off value of the TRISS was 0.9082, with a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 92.0%; mortality was predicted with an accuracy of 91.2%; its positive predictive value was the highest at 46.8%. Conclusions: The results of our study were based on the data from one institution and suggest that the TRISS is the best prediction model of trauma outcomes in the current Korean population. Further study is needed with more data from multiple centers in Korea.
Abstract
Background: Injury severity scoring systems that quantify and predict trauma outcomes have not been established in Korea. This study was designed to determine the best system for use in the Korean trauma population. Methods: We collected and analyzed the data from trauma patients admitted to our institution from January 2010 to December 2014. Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) were calculated based on the data from the enrolled patients. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the prediction ability of each scoring system was obtained, and a pairwise comparison of ROC curves was performed. Additionally, the cut-off values were estimated to predict mortality, and the corresponding accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were obtained. Results: A total of 7,120 trauma patients (6,668 blunt and 452 penetrating injuries) were enrolled in this study. The AUCs of ISS, RTS, and TRISS were 0.866, 0.894, and 0.942, respectively, and the prediction ability of the TRISS was significantly better than the others (p < 0.001, respectively). The cut-off value of the TRISS was 0.9082, with a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 92.0%; mortality was predicted with an accuracy of 91.2%; its positive predictive value was the highest at 46.8%. Conclusions: The results of our study were based on the data from one institution and suggest that the TRISS is the best prediction model of trauma outcomes in the current Korean population. Further study is needed with more data from multiple centers in Korea.
참고문헌 (31)
- Peden M, "The injury chart book: a graphical overview of the global burden of injuries" (2002), World Health Organization
- Mock CN, "Trauma outcomes in the rural developing world: comparison with an urban level I trauma center", J Trauma, 35, pp.518~523 (1993)
- Trunkey DD, "The medical world is flat too", World J Surg, 32, pp.1583~1604 (2008)
- 김현, "한국의 예방 가능 외상 사망률과 외상 처치 체계의 변화", 대한응급의학회지, 23(2), pp.189~197 (2012), 대한응급의학회[DOI]
- Wisner DH, "History and current status of trauma scoring systems", Arch Surg, 127, pp.111~117 (1992)
- "Rating the severity of tissue damage. I. The abbreviated scale", JAMA, 215, pp.277~280 (1971)
- Kim KH, "Assessment of the usefulness of various trauma scoring systems on the prognosis of multiple-injury patients", J Korean Surg Soc, 54, pp.943~950 (1998)
- 황지영, "교통사고 환자에서 외상 중증도 점수의 예측 타당도", 대한응급의학회지, 22(4), pp.329~334 (2011), 대한응급의학회
- Champion HR, "A revision of the trauma score", J Trauma, 29, pp.623~629 (1989)
- Robin X, "pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves", BMC Bioinformatics, 12, pp.77~ (2011)
- Schisterman EF, "Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples", Epidemiology, 16, pp.73~81 (2005)
- Chawda MN, "Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: which scoring system?", Injury, 35, pp.347~358 (2004)
- Baker SP, "The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care", J Trauma, 14, pp.187~196 (1974)
- Samuel JC, "Hospital-based injury data in Malawi: strategies for data collection and feasibility of trauma scoring tools", Trop Doct, 40, pp.98~99 (2010)
- Osler T, "A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring", J Trauma, 43, pp.922~926 (1997)
- Tamim H, "The injury severity score or the new injury severity score for predicting mortality, intensive care unit admission and length of hospital stay:experience from a university hospital in a developing country", Injury, 39, pp.115~120 (2008)
- Tay SY, "Comparison of the new injury severity score and the injury severity score", J Trauma, 56, pp.162~164 (2004)
- Becher RD, "Trauma", pp.77~90 (2013), McGraw-Hill
- Ahun E, "Value of the Glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial blood pressure score for predicting the mortality of major trauma patients presenting to the emergency department", Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 20, pp.241~247 (2014)
- Haac B, "The utility of the Kampala trauma score as a triage tool in a sub-Saharan African trauma cohort", World J Surg, 39, pp.356~362 (2015)
- Rastogi D, "Causality of injury and outcome in patients admitted in a major trauma center in North India", Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci, 4, pp.298~302 (2014)
- Weeks SR, "Is the Kampala trauma score an effective predictor of mortality in lowresource settings? A comparison of multiple trauma severity scores", World J Surg, 38, pp.1905~1911 (2014)
- Schluter PJ, "Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) coefficients 2009 revision", J Trauma, 68, pp.761~770 (2010)
- Boyd CR, "Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score", J Trauma, 27, pp.370~378 (1987)
- Champion HR, "Injury severity scoring again", J Trauma, 38, pp.94~95 (1995)
- Altman D, "Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines" (2000), BMJ Books
- Cayten CG, "Limitations of the TRISS method for interhospital comparisons: a multihospital study", J Trauma, 31, pp.471~482 (1991)
- Gabbe BJ, "TRISS: does it get better than this?", Acad Emerge Med, 11, pp.181~186 (2004)
- Glance LG, "Beyond the major trauma outcome study: benchmarking performance using a national contemporary, population-based trauma registry", J Trauma, 51, pp.725~727 (2001)
- Karmy-Jones R, "Results of a multiinstitutional outcome assessment: results of a structured peer review of TRISS-designated unexpected outcomes", J Trauma, 32, pp.196~203 (1992)
- Fujita T, "M-study from an urban trauma center in Tokyo", J Trauma, 69, pp.934~937 (2010)