본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

외상환자의 한국형 중증도 분류와 손상중증도 점수체계의 비교

Comparison between Korean Triage and Acuity Scale and Injury Severity Scoring System in Emergency Trauma Patients

신지은|이은자|김보화|장명진|최윤희
동서간호학연구소 (East-West Nursing Research Institute, Kyung Hee University)|2022.05|동서간호학연구지 (Journal of East-West Nursing Reseach)|제28권 제1호|pp. 10-20

3

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Mortality사망률Triage중증도 분류손상중증도 점수Injury severity score

초록

Purpose: We compared the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) determined the validity of KTAS for classifying trauma patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 10,865 trauma patients (aged ≥15 years) who visited a single regional trauma and emergency medical center from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020, was conducted. Data were collected from the Korean Trauma Data Bank. Based on KTAS classification, the rates of intensive care unit admission, surgery and intervention, transfusion, emergency room (ER) and hospital mortality, and ER stay time were investigated. Data were analyzed using Chi-square test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, receiver operating characteristic curve, and area under the ROC curve. Results: In the KTAS, severe trauma patients (ISS ≥16) were classified as Level 1 (79.6%), 2 (44.8%), 3 (15.5%), 4 (4.0%) and 5 (7.6%). The following were the predictive powers of KTAS, ISS, and RTS for different parameters: surgery and intervention rate, KTAS (.71), ISS (.70), and RTS (.63); transfusion rate within 4h, KTAS (.82), ISS (.82), and RTS (.74); ER stay time within 90 min, KTAS (.72), ISS (.62), and RTS (.56); and ER mortality, KTAS (.84), ISS (.72), and RTS (.88). These findings were statistically significant (p<.001). The sensitivity and specificity of KTAS for trauma patients were .88 (.87~.90), and .38 (.37~.39), respectively. Conclusion: KTAS is a useful classification system that can predict the clinical outcomes of patients with trauma, and effectively triage acutely ill trauma patients, thus provide appropriate treatment.

Abstract

Purpose: We compared the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) determined the validity of KTAS for classifying trauma patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 10,865 trauma patients (aged ≥15 years) who visited a single regional trauma and emergency medical center from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020, was conducted. Data were collected from the Korean Trauma Data Bank. Based on KTAS classification, the rates of intensive care unit admission, surgery and intervention, transfusion, emergency room (ER) and hospital mortality, and ER stay time were investigated. Data were analyzed using Chi-square test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, receiver operating characteristic curve, and area under the ROC curve. Results: In the KTAS, severe trauma patients (ISS ≥16) were classified as Level 1 (79.6%), 2 (44.8%), 3 (15.5%), 4 (4.0%) and 5 (7.6%). The following were the predictive powers of KTAS, ISS, and RTS for different parameters: surgery and intervention rate, KTAS (.71), ISS (.70), and RTS (.63); transfusion rate within 4h, KTAS (.82), ISS (.82), and RTS (.74); ER stay time within 90 min, KTAS (.72), ISS (.62), and RTS (.56); and ER mortality, KTAS (.84), ISS (.72), and RTS (.88). These findings were statistically significant (p<.001). The sensitivity and specificity of KTAS for trauma patients were .88 (.87~.90), and .38 (.37~.39), respectively. Conclusion: KTAS is a useful classification system that can predict the clinical outcomes of patients with trauma, and effectively triage acutely ill trauma patients, thus provide appropriate treatment.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Kam S, "Evaluating trauma care : TRISS method", Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine, 7(2), pp.179~187 (1996)
  2. "The difference in damage occurrence between regions is more than 7 times, and customized preventive management centered on the region is required" (2017)[URL]
  3. "The nation's “preventable trauma mortality rate" has improved significantly from 30.5% to 19.9%" (2019)[URL]
  4. Gerald McGwin, "Reassessment of the Tri-Modal Mortality Distribution in the Presence of a Regional Trauma System", Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection &amp; Critical Care, 66(2), pp.526~530 (2009), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  5. 임득호, "응급의료전달체계의 각 요인이 중증외상환자의 예후에 미치는 영향 분석", 대한외상학회지, 24(2), pp.89~94 (2011), 대한외상학회
  6. Nathan T. Mowery, "Emergency Department Length of Stay Is an Independent Predictor of Hospital Mortality in Trauma Activation Patients", Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection &amp; Critical Care, 70(6), pp.1317~1325 (2011), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  7. "2013 guidance on the project to support the establishment of regional trauma centers" (2013)[URL]
  8. Yoon YC, "Three-year analysis of patients and treatment experiences in the regional trauma center of Gachon University Gil Hospital between 2011 and 2013", Journal of Trauma and Injury, 27(4), pp.170~177 (2014)
  9. 박수로, "국내 권역외상센터의 공간구성 및 면적구성에 대한 건축계획적 연구", 의료·복지 건축, 23(3), pp.81~90 (2017), 한국의료복지건축학회[DOI]
  10. Yang MA, "Introduction to the tool to classify the severity levels of injury patients", Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, 7(41), pp.917~920 (2014)
  11. 김양헌, "성인 중증 외상환자에서 사망 예측을 위한 새로운 외상점수체계의 적용", 대한응급의학회지, 25(4), pp.447~455 (2014), 대한응급의학회
  12. Yutaka Kondo, "Revised trauma scoring system to predict in-hospital mortality in the emergency department: Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure score", Critical Care, 15(4), pp.R191~ (2011), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  13. Lee KH, "How to develop and use the KTAS (Korean Triage and Acuity Scale)", The Korean society of emergency medicine spring conference, pp.417~424 (2013), Uri Medicine Company
  14. 박준범, "한국형 응급환자 분류도구의 이해", 대한응급의학회지, 28(6), pp.547~551 (2017), 대한응급의학회
  15. 김지혁, "응급센터를 내원한 성인 환자의 중증도 분류 지표로서 한국형 중증도분류체계 (KTAS)의 타당도 분석: 일개 지역응급의료센터의 예비연구", 대한응급의학회지, 27(5), pp.436~441 (2016), 대한응급의학회
  16. Kang HJ, "The adequacy of Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS)compared with Injury Severity Score (ISS) in the trauma patients", Master, pp.2018
  17. Kim SN, "Analysis of correlation between new injury severity score and Korean triage and acuity scale in evaluating traumatic patients", Master, pp.2018
  18. 이인혜, "한국형 응급환자 분류도구(Korean Triage and Acuity Scale) 타당도 분석", 대한응급의학회지, 29(1), pp.13~20 (2018), 대한응급의학회
  19. "Enactment of the Korean emergency patients severity classification standard" (2015)[URL]
  20. Baker SP, "The injury severity score : A method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care", The Journal of Trauma, 14(3), pp.187~196 (1974)[DOI]
  21. 정경원, "외상환자에 대한 손상 중증도 점수체계와 국내 외상성과 연구", Journal of Acute Care Surgery, 6(1), pp.11~17 (2016), 대한외상중환자외과학회
  22. HOWARD R. CHAMPION, "A Revision of the Trauma Score", The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 29(5), pp.623~629 (1989), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  23. 최희정, "한국형 응급환자 분류도구의 타당도 평가", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 49(1), pp.26~35 (2019), 한국간호과학회[DOI]
  24. 김현주, "노인과 비노인 외상환자의 손상중증도에 따른 특성 비교", 한국보건간호학회지, 32(2), pp.304~318 (2018), 한국보건간호학회[DOI]
  25. Reyhan Orhon, "Comparison Of Trauma Scores For Predicting Mortality And Morbidity On Trauma Patients", Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 20(4), pp.258~264 (2014), Kare Publishing[DOI]
  26. Akkamahadevi Patil, "Comparison of Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score for Mortality Prediction in Elderly Trauma Patients", Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 23(2), pp.73~77 (2019), Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing[DOI]
  27. Hyeon Kyu Jo, "Factors for Predicting the Need for an Emergency Blood Transfusion to a Multiple Trauma Patient Using Emergency Room Transfusion Score (ETS)", Journal of Trauma and Injury, 28(1), pp.1~8 (2015), The Korean Society of Traumatology[DOI]
  28. 신진욱, "일개 어린이병원 응급실에서 시행한 새롭게 개발된 소아 5단계 중증도 분류의 타당도 연구", 대한응급의학회지, 28(6), pp.557~563 (2017), 대한응급의학회

관련 논문AI추천

The Best Prediction Model for Trauma Outcomes of the Current Korean Population: a Comparative Study of Three Injury Severity Scoring SystemsDukyong Yoon, John Cook-Jong Lee, Jonghwan Moon, Junsik Kwon, Kyoungwon Jung, Rae Woong Park, Sungjae Jung, Yo Huh, Younghwan Kim대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2016 · 제31권 제3호한국형 중증도 분류도구를 이용한 구급차별 중증도 분석박정제사단법인 한국응급구조학회 · 한국응급구조학회지2021 · 제25권 제3호Predicting Mortality of Korean Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Comparison between Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score박지예, 이윤환연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2022 · 제63권 제1호Development and Validation of Simple Age-Adjusted Objectified Korean Triage and Acuity Scale for Adult Patients Visiting the Emergency Department김동원, 김용원, 민용훈, 이귀자, 이동건, 조유환, 최효주, Seung Wook Kim연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2022 · 제63권 제3호중증도 분류자 직종에 따른 중증도 분류 결과의 차이 비교김세형, 박윤숙, 오미라, 한소현, 허영진중소기업융합학회 · 융합정보논문지2020 · 제10권 제4호Comparative length of emergency department stay of patients with different Korean Triage and Acute Scale severities: A descriptive analysis장경민사단법인 한국응급구조학회 · 한국응급구조학회지2022 · 제26권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

한방 간호사의 직무만족도 영향요인장애경, 김지영pp. 1-9코로나19 초기 유행 시 간호대학생의 감염예방행동 수행 영향요인이창금, 안준희pp. 21-30정신질환자에 대한 태도, 정신간호역량, 정신질환자 간호업무 스트레스가 일반 병동간호사의 소진에 미치는 영향이선미, 신성희, 윤정숙pp. 31-40성인 초기의 태도, 주관적 규범, 자기효능감이 미세먼지 노출저감화행위에 미치는 영향지은선, 신혜숙, 구지현, 김주희pp. 41-48수술실 의료진의 뇌사자 장기기증 태도 관련 요인신기수, 조은정pp. 49-56
원문 보기