7-mm-long dental implants: retrospective clinical outcomes in medically compromised patients
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: Dental implants shorter than 8 mm, called short dental implants (SDIs), have been considered to have a lower success rate than standard length implants. But recent studies have shown that SDIs have a comparable success rate, and implant diameter was more important for implant survival than implant length. Also, SDIs have many advantages, such as no need for sinus lifting or vertical bone grafting, which may limit use in medically compromised patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, 33 patients with 47 implants 7-mm long were examined over the last four years. All patients had special medical history and were categorized into 3 groups: systemic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus (controlled or uncontrolled), mental disability, and uncontrolled hypertension; oral cancer ablation with reconstruction, with or without radiotherapy; diverse osteomyelitis, such as osteoradionecrosis and bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Most of these patients have insufficient residual bone quality due to mandible atrophy or sinus pneumatization. Results: The implant diameters were 4.0 (n=38), 4.5 (n=8), and 5.0 mm (n=1). Among the 47 implants placed, 2 implants failed before the last follow-up. The survival rate of 7-mm SDIs was 95.74% from stage I surgery to the last follow-up. Survival rates did not differ according to implant diameter. The mean marginal bone loss (MBL) at 3 months, 1 and 2 years was significantly higher than at implant installation, and the MBL at 1 year was also significantly higher than at 3 months. MBL at 1 and 2 years did not differ significantly. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the results indicate that SDIs provide a reliable treatment, especially for medically compromised patients, to avoid sinus lifting or vertical bone grafting. Further, long-term follow-up is needed.
Abstract
Objectives: Dental implants shorter than 8 mm, called short dental implants (SDIs), have been considered to have a lower success rate than standard length implants. But recent studies have shown that SDIs have a comparable success rate, and implant diameter was more important for implant survival than implant length. Also, SDIs have many advantages, such as no need for sinus lifting or vertical bone grafting, which may limit use in medically compromised patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, 33 patients with 47 implants 7-mm long were examined over the last four years. All patients had special medical history and were categorized into 3 groups: systemic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus (controlled or uncontrolled), mental disability, and uncontrolled hypertension; oral cancer ablation with reconstruction, with or without radiotherapy; diverse osteomyelitis, such as osteoradionecrosis and bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Most of these patients have insufficient residual bone quality due to mandible atrophy or sinus pneumatization. Results: The implant diameters were 4.0 (n=38), 4.5 (n=8), and 5.0 mm (n=1). Among the 47 implants placed, 2 implants failed before the last follow-up. The survival rate of 7-mm SDIs was 95.74% from stage I surgery to the last follow-up. Survival rates did not differ according to implant diameter. The mean marginal bone loss (MBL) at 3 months, 1 and 2 years was significantly higher than at implant installation, and the MBL at 1 year was also significantly higher than at 3 months. MBL at 1 and 2 years did not differ significantly. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the results indicate that SDIs provide a reliable treatment, especially for medically compromised patients, to avoid sinus lifting or vertical bone grafting. Further, long-term follow-up is needed.
참고문헌 (31)
- Renouard F, "Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17(Suppl 2), pp.35~51 (2006)
- Jain N, "Short implants: new horizon in implant dentistry", J Clin Diagn Res, 10, pp.ZE14~ZE17 (2016)
- Al-Hashedi AA, "Short dental implants : an emerging concept in implant treatment", Quintessence Int, 45, pp.499~514 (2014)
- Nisand D, "Short implant in limited bone volume", Periodontol 2000, 66, pp.72~96 (2014)
- Sennerby L, "Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants : a review of the literature", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.408~420 (1998)
- Wyatt CC, "Treatment outcomes of patients with implantsupported fixed partial prostheses", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.204~211 (1998)
- Srinivasan M, "Efficacy and predictability of short dental implants(<8mm) : a critical appraisal of the recent literature", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.1429~1437 (2012)
- Karthikeyan I, "Short implants : a systematic review", J Indian Soc Periodontol, 16, pp.302~312 (2012)
- Lemos CA, "Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Dent, 47, pp.8~17 (2016)
- Benlidayi ME, "Short implants versus standard implants : midterm outcomes of a clinical study", Implant Dent, 27, pp.95~100 (2018)
- Zeinab Rezaei Esfahrood, "Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 43(2), pp.70~76 (2017), 대한구강악안면외과학회
- Pierrisnard L, "Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 5, pp.254~262 (2003)
- Anitua E, "Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution : a finite element analysis", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 30, pp.89~95 (2010)
- Chen H, "Smoking, radiotherapy, diabetes and osteoporosis as risk factors for dental implant failure : a meta-analysis", PLoS One, 8, pp.e71955~ (2013)
- Moy PK, "Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.569~577 (2005)
- Guobis Z, "General diseases influence on peri-implantitis development : a systematic review", J Oral Maxillofac Res, 7, pp.e5~ (2016)
- Liddelow G, "Patient-related risk factors for implant therapy. A critique of pertinent literature", Aust Dent J, 56, pp.417~426 (2011)
- Renvert S, "Factors related to peri-implantitis-a retrospective study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.522~529 (2014)
- Kasai T, "The prognosis for dental implants placed in patients taking oral bisphosphonates", J Calif Dent Assoc, 37, pp.39~42 (2009)
- Galindo-Moreno P, "Marginal bone loss as success criterion in implant dentistry : beyond 2 mm", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.e28~e34 (2015)
- Diz P, "Dental implants in the medically compromised patient", J Dent, 41, pp.195~206 (2013)
- Grant BT, "Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible : a retrospective study of 124cases", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.713~717 (2009)
- Barrowman RA, "Oral rehabilitation with dental implants after cancer treatment", Aust Dent J, 56, pp.160~165 (2011)
- Renouard F, "Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla : a 2-year retrospective clinical study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 7(Suppl 1), pp.104~110 (2005)
- Jemt T, "Failures and complications in 127consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants : from prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.40~44 (1992)
- Becker W, "Long-term evaluation of 282 implants in maxillary and mandibular molar positions : a prospective study", J Periodontol, 70, pp.896~901 (1999)
- Lee JH, "Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates : a literature review", J Prosthet Dent, 94, pp.377~381 (2005)
- Morand M, "The challenge of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla : providing a rationale for the use of short implants", J Oral Implantol, 33, pp.257~266 (2007)
- Mohajerani H, "The risk factors in early failure of dental implants: a retrospective study", J Dent(Shiraz), 18, pp.298~303 (2017)
- Bratu E, "Implant survival rate and marginal bone loss of 6-mm short implants : a 2-year clinical report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29, pp.1425~1428 (2014)
- Monje A, "Are short dental implants(<10 mm)effective? A meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials", J Periodontol, 84, pp.895~904 (2013)