Tilted implants for implant-supported fixed hybrid prostheses: retrospective review
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: This review assessed the performance of implant-supported fixed hybrid prostheses in 21 patients who received a total of 137 implants between 2003 and 2010. The implants were evaluated for marginal bone resorption, complications, success rate, and survival rate based on their vertical angularity, type of bone graft, and measured implant stability. Materials and Methods: One-way ANOVA and chi-square tests were used to analyze the relationships among long-term evaluation factors and these variables. The mean initial bone resorption in the implant group with a vertical angle of more than 20° was 0.33 mm and mean final bone resorption was 0.76 mm. In contrast, the mean initial bone resorption in the implant group with a vertical angle of less than 10° was 1.19 mm and mean final bone resorption was 2.17 mm. Results: The results showed that mean bone resorption decreased with an increase in the vertical placement angle of the implants used in fixed hybrid prostheses, as well as in the group without additional bone grafts and those with high implant stability. The success rate of implants placed after bone grafting was found to be higher than those placed simultaneously. Conclusion: These results suggest that implant-supported fixed hybrid prostheses may be an effective treatment option for edentulous patients, and intentionally placing implants with high angularity may improve outcomes.
Abstract
Objectives: This review assessed the performance of implant-supported fixed hybrid prostheses in 21 patients who received a total of 137 implants between 2003 and 2010. The implants were evaluated for marginal bone resorption, complications, success rate, and survival rate based on their vertical angularity, type of bone graft, and measured implant stability. Materials and Methods: One-way ANOVA and chi-square tests were used to analyze the relationships among long-term evaluation factors and these variables. The mean initial bone resorption in the implant group with a vertical angle of more than 20° was 0.33 mm and mean final bone resorption was 0.76 mm. In contrast, the mean initial bone resorption in the implant group with a vertical angle of less than 10° was 1.19 mm and mean final bone resorption was 2.17 mm. Results: The results showed that mean bone resorption decreased with an increase in the vertical placement angle of the implants used in fixed hybrid prostheses, as well as in the group without additional bone grafts and those with high implant stability. The success rate of implants placed after bone grafting was found to be higher than those placed simultaneously. Conclusion: These results suggest that implant-supported fixed hybrid prostheses may be an effective treatment option for edentulous patients, and intentionally placing implants with high angularity may improve outcomes.
참고문헌 (22)
- Kutkut A, "A systematic review of studies comparing conventional complete denture and implant retained overdenture", J Prosthodont Res, 62, pp.1~9 (2018)[DOI]
- Sivaramakrishnan G, "Comparison of implant supported mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies", Aust Dent J, 61, pp.482~488 (2016)[DOI]
- Egilmez F, "Implant-supported hybrid prosthesis : conventional treatment method for borderline cases", Eur J Dent, 9, pp.442~448 (2015)[DOI]
- Hyun DG, "Fixed hybrid prosthesis", J Korean Acad Esthet Dent, 27, pp.24~40 (2018)[DOI]
- Aglietta M, "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.441~451 (2009)[DOI]
- Misch CE, "Implant success, survival, and failure : the International Congress of Oral Implantologists(ICOI)Pisa Consensus Conference", Implant Dent, 17, pp.5~15 (2008)[DOI]
- Mehta SP, "Clinical success between tilted and axial implants in edentulous maxilla : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 21, pp.217~228 (2021)[DOI]
- Chrcanovic BR, "Tilted versus axially placed dental implants : a meta-analysis", J Dent, 43, pp.149~170 (2015)[DOI]
- Del Fabbro M, "The fate of marginal bone around axial vs. tilted implants: a systematic review", Eur J Oral Implantol, 7(Suppl 2), pp.S171~S189 (2014)
- Del Fabbro M, "Tilted implants for the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws : a systematic review", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 14, pp.612~621 (2012)[DOI]
- Peñarrocha Diago M, "Tilted implants for the restoration of posterior mandibles with horizontal atrophy : an alternative treatment", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 71, pp.856~864 (2013)[DOI]
- Krekmanov L, "Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.405~414 (2000)
- Capelli M, "Immediate rehabilitation of the completely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants : a multicenter clinical study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.639~644 (2007)
- Maló P, ""All-on-four"immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles : a retrospective clinical study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2003(Suppl 1), pp.2~9 (2003)[DOI]
- Maló P, "The allon-4 concept for full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxillae : a longitudinal study with 5-13 years of follow-up", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 21, pp.538~549 (2019)[DOI]
- Liu X, "Effects of different positions and angles of implants in maxillary edentulous jaw on surrounding bone stress under dynamic loading : a threedimensional finite element analysis", Comput Math Methods Med, 2019, pp.8074096~ (2019)[DOI]
- Behnaz E, "The effect of implant angulation and splinting on stress distribution in implant body and supporting bone : a finite element analysis", Eur J Dent, 9, pp.311~318 (2015)[DOI]
- Clementini M, "Immediate versus delayed positioning of dental implants in guided bone regeneration or onlay graft regenerated areas : a systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 42, pp.643~650 (2013)[DOI]
- Peñarrocha-Diago M, "Localized lateral alveolar ridge augmentation with block bone grafts : simultaneous versus delayed implant placement : a clinical and radiographic retrospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp.846~853 (2013)[DOI]
- Glauser R, "Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Successful vs. failing implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.428~434 (2004)[DOI]
- Huang H, "The clinical significance of implant stability quotient(ISQ)measurements : a literature review", J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 10, pp.629~638 (2020)[DOI]
- Benn DK, "A review of the reliability of radiographic measurements in estimating alveolar bone changes", J Clin Periodontol, 17, pp.14~21 (1990)[DOI]