본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Radiographic Outcomes of Osteosynthesis Using Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) System in Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture: Has PFNA II Solved All the Problems?

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: We evaluated the geometric discrepancies between the proximal femur in Koreans and two types of proximal femoral nail using plain radiographs. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 consecutive patients (38 treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation [PFNA], 62 PFNA II) with intertrochanteric fracture were retrospectively identified. The minimum follow up period was 32 months. The geometric analysis of the proximal femur was performed using preoperative true hip antero-posterior radiographs of the unaffected side, and the data were compared with the PFNA and PFNA II dimensions. Postoperative assessments were performed using postoperative radiographs for the proximal protruding length of nail tip, quality of reduction, implant position and the presence of lateral cortical impingement. Results: The geometric dimensions of the proximal femur were different between the two proximal femoral nail types. No impingement was detected in patients treated with PFNA II, whereas 13 cases of lateral impingement were observed in patients treated with PFNA. A significant association was observed between the short proximal femur and the presence of lateral cortical impingement (P=0.032) and between impingement and intraoperative reduction loss (P=0.012). Proximal protrusion of the nail tip was seen in 71 patients and no difference was observed between two groups. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the flat lateral surface of PFNA II can avoid lateral cortical impingement, which provide better fixation for intertrochanteric fracture. However, there was still a problem associated with longer proximal end of PFNA II compared with the proximal femoral length in Korean.

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the geometric discrepancies between the proximal femur in Koreans and two types of proximal femoral nail using plain radiographs. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 consecutive patients (38 treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation [PFNA], 62 PFNA II) with intertrochanteric fracture were retrospectively identified. The minimum follow up period was 32 months. The geometric analysis of the proximal femur was performed using preoperative true hip antero-posterior radiographs of the unaffected side, and the data were compared with the PFNA and PFNA II dimensions. Postoperative assessments were performed using postoperative radiographs for the proximal protruding length of nail tip, quality of reduction, implant position and the presence of lateral cortical impingement. Results: The geometric dimensions of the proximal femur were different between the two proximal femoral nail types. No impingement was detected in patients treated with PFNA II, whereas 13 cases of lateral impingement were observed in patients treated with PFNA. A significant association was observed between the short proximal femur and the presence of lateral cortical impingement (P=0.032) and between impingement and intraoperative reduction loss (P=0.012). Proximal protrusion of the nail tip was seen in 71 patients and no difference was observed between two groups. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the flat lateral surface of PFNA II can avoid lateral cortical impingement, which provide better fixation for intertrochanteric fracture. However, there was still a problem associated with longer proximal end of PFNA II compared with the proximal femoral length in Korean.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Gardenbroek TJ, "The proximal femur nail antirotation: an identifiable improvement in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fractures?", J Trauma, 71, pp.169~174 (2011)
  2. Garg B, "Outcome of short proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw for fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures. A randomised prospective comparative trial", Hip Int, 21, pp.531~536 (2011)
  3. Strauss E, "Helical blade versus sliding hip screw for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a biomechanical evaluation", Injury, 37, pp.984~989 (2006)
  4. Xu YZ, "A comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation device and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fracture", J Int Med Res, 38, pp.1266~1275 (2010)
  5. Verettas DA, "Systematic effects of surgical treatment of hip fractures : gliding screwplating vs intramedullary nailing", Injury, 41, pp.279~284 (2010)
  6. Macheras GA, "Does PFNA II avoid lateral cortex impingement for unstable peritrochanteric fractures?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, pp.3067~3076 (2012)
  7. Tao YL, "Does PFNA II avoid lateral cortex impingement for unstable peritrochanteric fractures?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471, pp.1393~1394 (2013)
  8. Tyagi V, "A computed tomography-based analysis of proximal femoral geometry for lateral impingement with two types of proximal femoral nail anterotation in subtrochanteric fractures", Injury, 41, pp.857~861 (2010)
  9. Cooper C, "Hip fractures in the elderly : a world-wide projection", Osteoporos Int, 2, pp.285~289 (1992)
  10. 김동수, "노령의 고관절 골절 환자의 술 후 사망률 및 관련 인자", 대한정형외과학회지, 43(4), pp.488~494 (2008), 대한정형외과학회
  11. Müller ME, "The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones" (1990), Spinger-Verlag
  12. Boldin C, "The proximal femoral nail (PFN)--a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a followup of 15 months", Acta Orthop Scand, 74, pp.53~58 (2003)
  13. Baumgaertner MR, "The pertrochanteric external fixator reduced pain, hospital stay, and mechanical complications in comparison with the sliding hip screw", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84-A, pp.1488~ (2002)
  14. Clevenland M, "A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 41-A, pp.1399~1408 (1959)
  15. AO Synthes, "The manual of PFNA and PFNA II" (2011), AO Synthes
  16. Hwang JH, "Mismatch between PFNa and medullary canal causing difficulty in nailing of the pertrochanteric fractures", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 128, pp.1443~1446 (2008)
  17. Khang G, "A study of Korean femoral geometry", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (406), pp.116~122 (2003)
  18. Sommers MB, "A laboratory model to evaluate cutout resistance of implants for pertrochanteric fracture fixation", J Orthop Trauma, 18, pp.361~368 (2004)
  19. 이기병, "근위 대퇴정을 이용한 대퇴골 전자부 골절 치료의 합병증", 대한골절학회지, 20(1), pp.6~6 (2007), 대한골절학회
  20. Boopalan PR, "Incidence and radiologic outcome of intraoperative lateral wall fractures in OTA 31A1 and A2 fractures treated with cephalomedullary nailing", J Orthop Trauma, 26, pp.638~642 (2012)
  21. Palm H, "Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures : an important predictor of a reoperation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89, pp.470~475 (2007)
  22. Hsu CE, "Lateral femoral wall thickness. A reliable predictor of post-operative lateral wall fracture in intertrochanteric fractures", Bone Joint J, 95-B, pp.1134~1138 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)