본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

골다공증성 불안정 대퇴골 전자간 골절에서 내고정물의 종류에 따른 방사선학적 결과 비교

Comparison of the Radiologic Outcomes following the Kinds of Implants in Treating Unstable Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Fracture

조인호|이우석|원예연|김광균
대한골다공증학회 (THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF OSTEOPOROSIS)|2013.04|OSTEOPOROSIS (The Journal of Korean Society of Osteoporosis)|제11권 제1호|pp. 19-25

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractureProximal femoral nail antirotationCompression hip screwGamma nailLocking compression plate dynamic hip screwRadiologic results
주제분류기타의약학

초록

Objectives: To determine whether kinds of implants would influence on the radiologic outcomes in the treatment of unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, radiologic outcomes of 151 patients with unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures undergoing surgical treatments were compared based on the types of fixation implants as follows : PFNA (53 cases, group Ⅰ), gamma nail 3(31 cases, group Ⅱ), CHS with TSP (43 cases, group Ⅲ), and helical blade type LCP-DHS with TSP (24 cases, group Ⅳ). On the follow-up radiographs after operations, we assessed differences of bone union durations, neck-shaft ankle changes, lag screw or helical blade slippages, and varus alpha angle changes among the study groups. Results: All the radiologic outcomes evaluated in this study were not significantly different among the study groups. The average bone union durations of the group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 17.7, 18.0, 18.2, and 17.8 weeks, respectively (P=0.429). The average variation of neck-shaft angle of the group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 3.6o, 3.1o, 3.7o and 2.9o, respectively (P=0.273). The average lag screw or blade slippage of the group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 5.1 mm, 3.3 mm, 3.6 mm and 2.7 mm, respectively (P=0.154). The average variation of varus alpha of the group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 5.3o, 4.7o, 4.1o and 4.6º, respectively (P=0.894). Conclusions: This study indicates that four typical types of fixation implants for treating unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures would not lead to differences in postoperative radiological outcomes.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether kinds of implants would influence on the radiologic outcomes in the treatment of unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, radiologic outcomes of 151 patients with unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures undergoing surgical treatments were compared based on the types of fixation implants as follows : PFNA (53 cases, group Ⅰ), gamma nail 3(31 cases, group Ⅱ), CHS with TSP (43 cases, group Ⅲ), and helical blade type LCP-DHS with TSP (24 cases, group Ⅳ). On the follow-up radiographs after operations, we assessed differences of bone union durations, neck-shaft ankle changes, lag screw or helical blade slippages, and varus alpha angle changes among the study groups. Results: All the radiologic outcomes evaluated in this study were not significantly different among the study groups. The average bone union durations of the group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 17.7, 18.0, 18.2, and 17.8 weeks, respectively (P=0.429). The average variation of neck-shaft angle of the group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 3.6o, 3.1o, 3.7o and 2.9o, respectively (P=0.273). The average lag screw or blade slippage of the group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 5.1 mm, 3.3 mm, 3.6 mm and 2.7 mm, respectively (P=0.154). The average variation of varus alpha of the group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 5.3o, 4.7o, 4.1o and 4.6º, respectively (P=0.894). Conclusions: This study indicates that four typical types of fixation implants for treating unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures would not lead to differences in postoperative radiological outcomes.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 남우동, "90세 이상의 고령 환자에서 발생한 전자간 골절의 근위 대퇴정을 이용한 치료", Hip and Pelvis, 21(4), pp.339~344 (2009), 대한고관절학회
  2. Parker MJ, "A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 75, pp.797~798 (1993)
  3. 김용식, "심한 골다공증 환자에서 압박 고 나사 금속판을 이용한 대퇴 전자간 골절의 치료", Hip and Pelvis, 21(1), pp.29~34 (2009), 대한고관절학회
  4. 노재영, "불안정성 대퇴골 전자간 골절의 치료에서 항회전 근위 대퇴 골수정과 전자부 안정화 금속판을 이용한 압박 고 나사의 비교", 대한골절학회지, 23(2), pp.161~166 (2010), 대한골절학회
  5. Aune AK, "Gamma nail vs compression screw for trochanteric femoral fractures. 15 reoperation in a prospective, randomized study of 378 patients", Acta Orthop Scand, 65, pp.127~130 (1994)
  6. Babst R, "Clinical results using the trochanter stabilizing plate (TSP): the modular extension of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) for internal fixation of selected unstable intertrochanteric fractures", J Orthop Trauma, 12, pp.392~399 (1998)
  7. Lorich DG, "Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures: management and current controversies", Instr Course Lect, 53, pp.441~454 (2004)
  8. Buciuto R, "RAB-plate vs Richards CHS plate for unstable trochanteric hip fractures. A randomized study of 233 patients with 1-year follow-up", Acta Orthop Scand, 69, pp.25~28 (1998)
  9. Madsen JE, "Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw", J Orthop Trauma, 12, pp.241~248 (1998)
  10. Su ET, "The effect of an attachable lateral support plate on the stability of intertrochanteric fracture fixation with a sliding hip screw", J Trauma, 55, pp.504~508 (2003)
  11. Sommers MB, "A laboratory model to evaluate cutout resistance of implants for pertrochanteric fracture fixation", J Orthop Trauma, 18, pp.361~368 (2004)
  12. Swiontkowski MF, "Torsion and bending analysis of internal fixation techniques for femoral neck fractures: the role of implant design and bone density", J Orthop Res, 5, pp.433~444 (1987)
  13. Simmermacher RK, "The AO", ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures, 1999, pp.30, 327~332
  14. Windolf, M, "Is a helical shaped implant a superior alternative to the Dynamic Hip Screw for unstable femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical investigation", Clin Biomech, 24, pp.59~64 (2009)
  15. Strauss E, "Helical blade versus sliding hip screw for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a Biomechanical evaluation", Injury, 37, pp.984~989 (2006)
  16. Ahrengart L, "A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 401, pp.209~222 (2002)
  17. Niemeyer P, "Principles and clinical application of the locking compression plate (LCP)", Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 73, pp.221~228 (2006)
  18. Jewell DP, "Locking plates increase the strength of dynamic hip screws", Injury, 39, pp.209~212 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

대퇴 전자간 골절에 있어 고정형 전자부 금속정, 항회전 근위 대퇴 금속정 및 3세대 감마정의 치료 비교왕립, 김선효, 김성수, 김철홍, 김현준, 이규열, 이명진대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2013 · 제25권 제3호과활강제한 압박고나사 및 전자부 안정화 금속판을 이용한 불안정성 대퇴골 전자간부 골절치료고상봉, 이상화, 조대원, 조명래대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2012 · 제24권 제1호The Fixation Method according to the Fracture Type of the Greater Trochanter in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Undergoing Arthroplasty박병섭, 선두훈, 이봉주, 장근일대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2017 · 제29권 제1호불안정 대퇴 전자간 골절에서 소전자부 골편의 고정 효과강준순, 김려섭, 문경호, 배주한, 이병철대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2009 · 제21권 제3호타곤 근위 대퇴정을 이용한 대퇴골 전자간 골절의 치료박일호, 원종경, 한계영대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2012 · 제24권 제2호대퇴 전자간 골절에서 항회전 근위 대퇴 골수정의 고정 실패이경재대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2012 · 제24권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

골다공증성 척추 압박 골절에서 경피적 척추성형술의 효과양준영pp. 1-8한국 폐경 여성에서 호르몬치료 전후 Leptin계, 골의 생화학적 인자, 골밀도 사이의 연관성고하늬, 김훈, 구승엽, 김정구, 이희준, 최영민, 김석현pp. 9-18골밀도가 낮은 폐경 전 여성에서 알렌드로네이트 1년간 투여 후 골밀도 변화정혁, 유현주, 김수아pp. 26-32폐경 여성에서 3년 동안 호르몬 요법, 랄록시펜, 알렌드로네이트 치료 후 혈청 지질과 체질량 지수의 변화이지은, 김복린, 조용균, 이철민, 최훈, 고지경, 김명환pp. 33-4265세 이상 여성 근위 대퇴골 골절 환자들에서 측정한 Singh Index의 신뢰도유문집, 박희곤, 양석원pp. 43-49
원문 보기