Comparison of the effects of two different styles of orally prescribing prednisolone on postoperative sequelae of surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar: a single-blind randomized study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: Surgical intervention for removal of an impacted third molar can lead to significant pain and swelling. Corticosteroids show promise for mitigating postoperative sequelae across various surgical contexts. The use of corticosteroids following minor oral surgery, though controversial, has already been proven effective. However, little research has explored peroral prescription of corticosteroids despite its convenience for outpatients and for non-surgeons like implantologists and periodontists and others who don’t have access to needle injections. The aim of this study was to address a void in the literature by comparing the effects of two styles of preoral administration of prednisolone after surgical removal of the mandibular third molar and to determine which style minimizes postoperative sequelae. Materials and Methods: A randomized, split-mouth clinical study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of two different styles of preoral prednisolone in mitigating postoperative sequelae following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Fifteen participants were enrolled in the study. Random selection was used to determine the prescription style for the right and left mandibular arch. Group A included those who received a single dose of prednisolone 25 mg, while group B received prednisolone 5 mg postoperatively for a period of three days (5 mg three times/day on the first postoperative day, 5 mg twice/day on the second postoperative day; 5 mg once/day on the third postoperative day). Results: There was a significant difference in the distance between the corner of the mouth and tragus, which decreased with the time interval with respect to group B when compared to group A. Conclusion: The present study showed that a three-day tapered dose of prednisolone postoperatively was more effective in reducing post-extraction sequelae than a single-dose regimen.
Abstract
Objectives: Surgical intervention for removal of an impacted third molar can lead to significant pain and swelling. Corticosteroids show promise for mitigating postoperative sequelae across various surgical contexts. The use of corticosteroids following minor oral surgery, though controversial, has already been proven effective. However, little research has explored peroral prescription of corticosteroids despite its convenience for outpatients and for non-surgeons like implantologists and periodontists and others who don’t have access to needle injections. The aim of this study was to address a void in the literature by comparing the effects of two styles of preoral administration of prednisolone after surgical removal of the mandibular third molar and to determine which style minimizes postoperative sequelae. Materials and Methods: A randomized, split-mouth clinical study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of two different styles of preoral prednisolone in mitigating postoperative sequelae following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Fifteen participants were enrolled in the study. Random selection was used to determine the prescription style for the right and left mandibular arch. Group A included those who received a single dose of prednisolone 25 mg, while group B received prednisolone 5 mg postoperatively for a period of three days (5 mg three times/day on the first postoperative day, 5 mg twice/day on the second postoperative day; 5 mg once/day on the third postoperative day). Results: There was a significant difference in the distance between the corner of the mouth and tragus, which decreased with the time interval with respect to group B when compared to group A. Conclusion: The present study showed that a three-day tapered dose of prednisolone postoperatively was more effective in reducing post-extraction sequelae than a single-dose regimen.
참고문헌 (35)
- Montgomery MT, "The use of glucocorticosteroids to lessen the inflammatory sequelae following third molar surgery", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 48, pp.179~187 (1990)[DOI]
- Micó-Llorens JM, "Efficacy of methylprednisolone in controlling complications after impacted lower third molar surgical extraction", Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 62, pp.693~698 (2006)[DOI]
- Herrera-Briones FJ, "Update on the use of corticosteroids in third molar surgery : systematic review of the literature", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 116, pp.e342~e351 (2013)[DOI]
- Al-Shamiri HM, "Comparative assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dexamethasone on postoperative complications following lower third molar surgical extraction", Int J Dent, 2017, pp.1350375~ (2017)[DOI]
- Chugh A, "Submucosal injection of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone for the control of postoperative sequelae after third molar surgery : randomized controlled trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 47, pp.228~233 (2018)[DOI]
- Chaudhary PD, "Pre-emptive effect of dexamethasone injection and consumption on post-operative swelling, pain, and trismus after third molar surgery. A prospective, double blind and randomized study", J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 5, pp.21~27 (2015)[DOI]
- Graziani F, "Perioperative dexamethasone reduces post-surgical sequelae of wisdom tooth removal. A split-mouth randomized double-masked clinical trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 35, pp.241~246 (2006)[DOI]
- Agrawal A, "The efficacy of intralesional dexamethasone versus intravenous dexamethasone in surgery for impacted third molars : a randomized controlled trial", Natl J Maxillofac Surg, 11, pp.94~97 (2020)[DOI]
- Suleiman IK, "Effect of dexamethasone, ketoprofen and cold compress on postoperative sequelae in mandibular third molar surgery : a randomized clinical trial", Adv Oral Maxillofac Surg, 5, pp.100211~ (2022)[DOI]
- Warraich R, "Evaluation of postoperative discomfort following third molar surgery using submucosal dexamethasone-a randomized observer blind prospective study", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 116, pp.16~22 (2013)[DOI]
- Claman HN, "Glucocorticosteroids II : the clinical responses", Hosp Pract(Off Ed), 18, pp.143~146 (1983)[DOI]
- Axelrod L, "Glucocorticoid therapy", Medicine(Baltimore), 55, pp.39~65 (1976)[DOI]
- Gilman AG, "Goodman and Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics", pp.1436~ (1990), Mcgraw-Hill
- Flower RJ, "Anti-inflammatory steroids induce biosynthesis of a phospholipase A2 inhibitor which prevents prostaglandin generation", Nature, 278, pp.456~459 (1979)[DOI]
- Hargreaves KM, "Dexamethasone alters plasma levels of beta-endorphin and postoperative pain", Clin Pharmacol Ther, 42, pp.601~607 (1987)[DOI]
- Appelt GD, "Therapeutic pharmacology", pp.318~320 (1988), Lea & Febiger
- Bosker G, "Pharmatecture: minimizing medications to maximize results", pp.125~226 (1999), Facts and Comparisons
- UStün Y, "Comparison of the effects of 2 doses of methylprednisolone on pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 96, pp.535~539 (2003)[DOI]
- Hyrkäs T, "Effect of preoperative single doses of diclofenac and methylprednisolone on wound healing", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 28, pp.275~278 (1994)[DOI]
- Hyrkäs T, "A comparison of diclofenac with and without single-dose intravenous steroid to prevent postoperative pain after third molar removal", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 51, pp.634~636 (1993)[DOI]
- Bamgbose BO, "Effects of co-administered dexamethasone and diclofenac potassium on pain, swelling and trismus following third molar surgery", Head Face Med, 1, pp.11~ (2005)[DOI]
- Allikmets L, "Õpik üliõpilastele ja käsiraamat arstidele ning proviisoritele", pp.472~477 (2000), University of Tartu
- Esen E, "Determination of the anti-inflammatory effects of methylprednisolone on the sequelae of third molar surgery", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 57, pp.1201~1206 (1999)[DOI]
- Schimmer BP, "Goodman and Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics", pp.1587~ (2001), McGraw-Hill
- Al-Khateeb TL, "Clinical evaluation of dexamethasone vs. methylprednisolone for reducing postoperative inflammatory sequelae following third molar surgery", Saudi Dent J, 8, pp.13~ (1996)
- Holland CS, "The influence of methylprednisolone on post-operative swelling following oral surgery", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 25, pp.293~299 (1987)[DOI]
- Beirne OR, "The effect of methylprednisolone on pain, trismus, and swelling after removal of third molars", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 61, pp.134~138 (1986)[DOI]
- Neupert EA 3rd, "Evaluation of dexamethasone for reduction of postsurgical sequelae of third molar removal", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 50, pp.1177~1182 (1992)[DOI]
- Milles M, "Reduction of postoperative facial swelling by low-dose methylprednisolone : an experimental study", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 51, pp.987~991 (1993)[DOI]
- Skjelbred P, "Reduction of pain and swelling by a corticosteroid injected 3 hours after surgery", Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 23, pp.141~146 (1982)[DOI]
- Selvido DI, "Review of dexamethasone administration for management of complications in postoperative third molar surgery", J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 47, pp.341~350 (2021)[DOI]
- Linenberg WB, "The clinical evaluation of dexamethasone in oral surgery", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 20, pp.6~28 (1965)[DOI]
- Caci F, "Double-blind study of prednisolone and papase as inhibitors of complications after oral surgery", J Am Dent Assoc, 93, pp.325~327 (1976)[DOI]
- Campbell WI, "Postoperative dental pain--a comparative study of anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents", Ulster Med J, 60, pp.39~43 (1991)
- Osunde OD, "Management of inflammatory complications in third molar surgery : a review of the literature", Afr Health Sci, 11, pp.530~537 (2011)