본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

제1·2차 만주 폐페스트의 유행과 일제의 방역행정(1910-1921)

The First and the Second Pneumonic Plague in Manchuria and the Preventive Measure of Japanese Colonial Authorities (1910-1921)

1

조회

0

다운로드

22

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

During the first plague epidemic in Manchuria (1910-1911), Japanese Government-General in Korea had not reported a plague patient at all in official. This did not mean the preventive measure of colonial authorities was successful. Their prevention program and measure were operated inadequately. They focused on instigative and sometimes irrelevant aspects such as rat removal to restore order in the colony. The quarantine facility was insufficient so that some people could not be effectively isolated. The reason pneumonic plague did not spread from Manchuria to Korea was mostly because Chinese coolie did not enter Korea. The colonial government promulgated Jeonyeombyeong Yebangryeong (Preventive Regulation of Contagious Disease) in June 5, 1915. This regulation aimed at unitary control by police and was strengthened 10-day quarantine. After the March First Movement, the colonial government tried to change imperial policy to cultural policy. The military police and civilian police were bifurcated and governors took charge of health administration. However, sanitary police still played important role for preventive measure. The preventive policy of colonial government experienced important change from cholera epidemic between 1919 and 1920. The death toll of two years had exceeded 20,000 people. During the cholera outbreak of two years, quarantine and isolation were emerged as important tools to prevent disease transmission, and were well-appointed more now than before. To prevent cholera epidemic, the colonial government strengthened house-tohouse inspection as well as seaport quarantine, train quarantine, passenger quarantine. House-to-house inspection detected sixty percentage of cholera patients. When the second Manchurian plague spread in Korea in 1920-1921, this plague was known to Korean people as pneumonic plague. The colonial government propagated and educated pneumonic plague, and urged to wear a mask through Heuksabyeong Yebang Simdeuk (The Notandum for Plague Prevention). The colonial government did not focused on rat removal any more. They pointed out Chinese coolie as a source of infection. Though they did not know exact information and analysis on pneumonic plague, the preventive measure of the second plague in Manchuria was successful due to the well-equipped disinfection system such as house-to-house inspection and nationwide quarantine made by cholera prevention. While the first prevention of plague in Manchuria was successful despite rubbish preventive system, the second prevention of plague in Manchuria was successful due to the well-equipped disinfection system in spite of occurring plague patients.

Abstract

During the first plague epidemic in Manchuria (1910-1911), Japanese Government-General in Korea had not reported a plague patient at all in official. This did not mean the preventive measure of colonial authorities was successful. Their prevention program and measure were operated inadequately. They focused on instigative and sometimes irrelevant aspects such as rat removal to restore order in the colony. The quarantine facility was insufficient so that some people could not be effectively isolated. The reason pneumonic plague did not spread from Manchuria to Korea was mostly because Chinese coolie did not enter Korea. The colonial government promulgated Jeonyeombyeong Yebangryeong (Preventive Regulation of Contagious Disease) in June 5, 1915. This regulation aimed at unitary control by police and was strengthened 10-day quarantine. After the March First Movement, the colonial government tried to change imperial policy to cultural policy. The military police and civilian police were bifurcated and governors took charge of health administration. However, sanitary police still played important role for preventive measure. The preventive policy of colonial government experienced important change from cholera epidemic between 1919 and 1920. The death toll of two years had exceeded 20,000 people. During the cholera outbreak of two years, quarantine and isolation were emerged as important tools to prevent disease transmission, and were well-appointed more now than before. To prevent cholera epidemic, the colonial government strengthened house-tohouse inspection as well as seaport quarantine, train quarantine, passenger quarantine. House-to-house inspection detected sixty percentage of cholera patients. When the second Manchurian plague spread in Korea in 1920-1921, this plague was known to Korean people as pneumonic plague. The colonial government propagated and educated pneumonic plague, and urged to wear a mask through Heuksabyeong Yebang Simdeuk (The Notandum for Plague Prevention). The colonial government did not focused on rat removal any more. They pointed out Chinese coolie as a source of infection. Though they did not know exact information and analysis on pneumonic plague, the preventive measure of the second plague in Manchuria was successful due to the well-equipped disinfection system such as house-to-house inspection and nationwide quarantine made by cholera prevention. While the first prevention of plague in Manchuria was successful despite rubbish preventive system, the second prevention of plague in Manchuria was successful due to the well-equipped disinfection system in spite of occurring plague patients.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. "警務月報", ~
  2. "京城新報", ~
  3. "東亞日報", ~
  4. "每日申報", ~
  5. "朝鮮新報", ~
  6. "朝鮮日報", ~
  7. "朝鮮總督府官報", ~
  8. "朝鮮彙報", ~
  9. "朝鮮警察之槪要", 朝鮮總督府警務局, ~ (1914)
  10. "朝鮮警察槪要", 朝鮮總督府警務局, ~ (1940)
  11. ペスト防疫施設報告書(其35~其39), , 關東都督府臨時防疫部, ~
  12. "明治四十三四年「ペスト」流行誌", 關東都督府臨時防疫部, ~ (1912)
  13. 朝鮮總督府, "大正8年虎列刺病防疫誌" (1920), 朝鮮總督府
  14. 朝鮮總督府, "大正9年コレラ病虎防疫誌" (1921), 朝鮮總督府
  15. 朝鮮總督府警務局, "朝鮮防疫統計" (1941), 朝鮮總督府警務局
  16. 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮總督府施政年報(1941)" (1943), 朝鮮總督府
  17. "第87-2ペスト豫防の件, 南滿洲ペスト一件』, アジア歷史資料センタ, 海軍省-公文備考-M44-92-1270", 0231~ (1911)
  18. Wu Lien-teh, "Plague in the Orient with Special Reference to the Manchurian Outbreaks", The China Medical Journal, 36 (1922)
  19. Wu Lien-teh, "The Second Pneumonic Plague Epidemic in Manchuria, 1920-21. I. A General Survey of the Outbreak and Its Course", The Journal of Hygiene, 21(3) (1920)
  20. 신규환, "질병의 사회사: 동아시아 의학의 재발견" (2006), 살림
  21. 신동원, "한국근대보건의료사" (1997), 한울
  22. 박윤재, "한국 근대의학의 기원" (2005), 혜안
  23. 대한감염학회, "한국전염병사" (2010), 군자출판사
  24. 焦潤明, "淸末東三省鼠疫災難及防疫措施硏究" (2011), 北京師範大學出版社
  25. 飯島涉, "ペストと近代中國" (2000), 硏文出版
  26. Wu Lien-Teh, "Plague Fighter: The Autobiography of a Modern Chinese Physician" (1959), Cambridge
  27. Carl F. Nathan, "Plague Prevention and Politics in Manchuria, 1910~1931" (1967), Mass.
  28. 권기하, "1910년대 총독부의 위생사업과 식민지 '신민'의 형성", 석사, 사학과, pp.2010
  29. 박윤재, "1910年代 初 日帝의 페스트 防疫活動과 朝鮮支配, In 河炫綱敎授定年紀念論叢: 韓國史의 構造와 展開" (2000), 혜안
  30. 박윤재, "조선총독부의 지방 의료정책과 의료 소비", 역사문제연구, 13(1), pp.161~183 (2009), 역사문제연구소
  31. 백선례, "1919·20년 식민지 조선의 콜레라 방역활동: 방역당국과 조선인의 대응을 중심으로", 사학연구, (101), pp.205~240 (2011), 한국사학회
  32. 정근식, "식민지 위생경찰의 형성과 변화, 그리고 유산: 식민지 통치성의 시각에서", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), 90, pp.221~270 (2011), 한국사회사학회
  33. 정민재, "근대 의학 수용에 대한 자주적 노력-개항에서 대한제국시기까지", 한성사학, 21 (2006)
  34. 金穎穗, "植民地朝鮮におけるコレラの大流行と防疫對策の変化: 1919年と1920年の流行を中心に", アジア地域文化研究, (8) (2012)
  35. Park Yunjae, "Sanitizing Korea: Anti-Cholera Activities of the Police in Early Colonial Korea", Seoul Journal of Korean Studies, 23(2), pp.151~172 (2010), 규장각한국학연구원
  36. Seon Hsiang-lin Lei, "Sovereignty and the Microscope: Constituting Notifiable Disease and Containing the Manchurian Plague, In Health and Hygiene in Chinese East Asia" (2010), Duke University Press
  37. Sihn Kyu-hwan, "Unexpected Success: The Spread of Manchurian Plague and the Response of Japanese Colonial Rule in Korea, 1910-1911", Korea Journal, 49(2), pp.165~182 (2009), 유네스코한국위원회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)