청말 해부학 혁명과 해부학적 인식의 전환
The Anatomical Revolution and the Transition of Anatomical Conception in Late Imperial China
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aimed to examine the anatomical revolution from Yilingaicuo (Correcting the Errors of Medicine) and Quantixinlun(Outline of Anatomy and Physiology) in late imperial China. As the cephalocentrism which the brain superintend human operation of the mind was diffused in China since 16th century, the cephalocentrism and the cardiocentrism had competed for the hegemony of anatomical conception. Because of the advent of Yilingaicuo and Quantixinlun, the cephalocentrism became the main stream in the anatomical conception. The supporters of the Wang Yangming’s Xinxue(the Learning of Heart and Mind) argued that the heart was the central organ of perception, sensitivity, and morality of the human body in medicine since 16th century. Even reformist and revolutionary intellectuals like Tan sitong and Mao zedong who had supported the Wang Yangming’s Xinxue embraced the cephalocentrism in the late 19th century and the early 20th century. May Fourth intellectuals had not obsessed metaphysical interpretation of human body any more in the New Culture Movement in 1910s. They regarded human body as the object of research and writing. The anatomy was transformed into the instrumental knowledge for mutilation of the body. Yilingaicuo challenged the traditional conception of body, and Chinese intellectuals drew interest in the anatomy knowledge based on real mutilation. Quantixinlun based on Western medicine fueled a controversy about anatomy. Though new knowledge of anatomy was criticized by traditional Chinese medical doctors from the usefulness and morality of anatomy, nobody disavowed new knowledge of anatomy from the institutionalization of Western medicine in medical school. The internal development of cephalocentrism and positivism had influence on anatomy in China since 16th century. The advent of Yilingaicuo and Quantixinlun provided the milestone of new anatomy, though both sides represented traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine respectively. They contributed to the development of new knowledge of anatomy, getting over the metaphysical system of knowledge. Based on the internal development of anatomy, Chinese anatomy was half century late than Japanese anatomy founded on Dutch anatomy.
Abstract
This paper aimed to examine the anatomical revolution from Yilingaicuo (Correcting the Errors of Medicine) and Quantixinlun(Outline of Anatomy and Physiology) in late imperial China. As the cephalocentrism which the brain superintend human operation of the mind was diffused in China since 16th century, the cephalocentrism and the cardiocentrism had competed for the hegemony of anatomical conception. Because of the advent of Yilingaicuo and Quantixinlun, the cephalocentrism became the main stream in the anatomical conception. The supporters of the Wang Yangming’s Xinxue(the Learning of Heart and Mind) argued that the heart was the central organ of perception, sensitivity, and morality of the human body in medicine since 16th century. Even reformist and revolutionary intellectuals like Tan sitong and Mao zedong who had supported the Wang Yangming’s Xinxue embraced the cephalocentrism in the late 19th century and the early 20th century. May Fourth intellectuals had not obsessed metaphysical interpretation of human body any more in the New Culture Movement in 1910s. They regarded human body as the object of research and writing. The anatomy was transformed into the instrumental knowledge for mutilation of the body. Yilingaicuo challenged the traditional conception of body, and Chinese intellectuals drew interest in the anatomy knowledge based on real mutilation. Quantixinlun based on Western medicine fueled a controversy about anatomy. Though new knowledge of anatomy was criticized by traditional Chinese medical doctors from the usefulness and morality of anatomy, nobody disavowed new knowledge of anatomy from the institutionalization of Western medicine in medical school. The internal development of cephalocentrism and positivism had influence on anatomy in China since 16th century. The advent of Yilingaicuo and Quantixinlun provided the milestone of new anatomy, though both sides represented traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine respectively. They contributed to the development of new knowledge of anatomy, getting over the metaphysical system of knowledge. Based on the internal development of anatomy, Chinese anatomy was half century late than Japanese anatomy founded on Dutch anatomy.
참고문헌 (53)
- 合信, "전체신론" (1851), 墨海書館
- 方行, "王韜日記" (1987), 中華書局
- 王問樵, "何炳元의 「論中國急宜開醫智」" (1909), 醫學叢編
- 魯迅, "吶喊自序, In 魯迅全集 第1卷" (1996), 人民文學出版社
- 湯若望, "主制群徵, In 明末淸初耶蘇會思想文獻匯編" (2003), 北京大學宗敎硏究所
- 王勳臣, "醫林改錯(1830)" (1975), 台聯國風出版社
- 陸懋修, "論王淸任醫林改錯, In 世補齋醫書 卷10"
- 兪正燮, "書人身圖說後, In 癸巳類稿(1833) 卷14" (1965), 世界書局
- 楊照藜, "總評, In 重慶堂髓筆" (1986), 江蘇科學技術
- 丁曉强, "毛澤東早年思想與陽明心學", 中國社會科學, 통권 : 5 (1993)
- 毛澤東, "毛澤東集 第2版, 第1卷" (1983), 蒼蒼社
- 蔡尙思, "譚嗣同全集(增訂本)" (1998), 中華書局
- 郭沫若, "解剖室中", 時事新報·學燈, ~ (1920)
- 郭沫若, "創造十年" (1932), 現代書局
- 王昻, "續修四庫全書", pp.993~ (1995), 上海古籍出版社
- 唐宗海, "續修四庫全書", pp.982~ (1995), 上海古籍出版社
- 金斗鍾, "漢方醫學의 解剖學的 硏究", 漢方の臨床, 25(9) (1978)
- 金斗鍾, "漢方醫學의 解剖學的 硏究 2", 漢方の臨床, 25(10) (1978)
- 김수명, "우리나라 한의학의 사람해부 역사", 대전대학교 한의학연구소 논문집(한의학편), 4(1) (1995)
- 朴泰浩, "東洋에서의 人體解剖에 對한 認識과 解剖知識의 發達에 關한 硏究", 대전대학교 한의학연구소 논문집(한의학편), 1(1) (1992)
- 박형우, "한국에서 최초로 발간된 해부학 교과서와 편찬 배경", Anatomy and Cell Biology, 39(6), pp.461~469 (2006), 대한해부학회
- 박형우, "解剖學者 崔明鶴", 醫史學, 1 (1992)
- 裵永東, "譚嗣同『仁學』의 論理", 中國史硏究, 11 (2000)
- 신동원, "물질문화와 농민의 삶" (2009), 태학사
- 여인석, "동양 삼국의 해부학 도입 역사에 관한 연구", 석사, 의학과, pp.1991
- 여인석, "일본의 해부학 도입과 정착 과정", 醫史學, 3(2) (1994)
- 여인석, "최한기의 의학사상", 의사학, 2(1) (1993)
- 이영택, "우리나라에서 실용되어 온 인체해부도", 서울대논문집(자연과학), 5 (1957)
- 주원준, "마테오 리치, 기억의 궁전" (1999), 이산
- 龔繼民, "郭沫若年譜 上" (1987), 天津人民出版社
- 利瑪竇, "利瑪竇中文著譯集" (2001), 復旦大學出版社
- 馬伯英, "合信硏究『전체신론』考評", 上海醫科大學學報(社科版) (1992)
- 馬伯英, "中外醫學文化交流史" (1998), 電波科學社
- 范行准, "明季西洋傳入之醫學" (1943), 中華醫史學會
- 汪林茂, "中國走向近代化的里程碑" (1998), 重慶出版社
- 劉澤華, "中國政治思想史(隋唐宋元明淸卷)" (1996), 浙江人民出版社
- 李亞舒, "中國科學飜譯史" (2000), 湖南敎育出版社
- 張大慶, "中國近代解剖學史略", 中國科技史料, 15(4) (1994)
- 趙璞珊, "合信的『西醫五種』和中國的影響", 近代史硏究, 62 (1991)
- 趙洪鈞, "近代中西醫論爭史" (1989), 安徽科學技術出版社
- 丁曉强, "毛澤東早年思想與陽明心學", 中國社會科學, 통권 : 5 (1993)
- 陳勝崑, "中國傳統醫學史" (1992), 橘井文化事業股份有限公司
- 小川鼎三, "明治前 日本解剖學史, In 明治前 日本醫學史 第一卷" (1955), 日本學術振興會
- 坂元 ひろ子, "中國近代思想の一斷面-譚嗣同 以太(イテル)論", 思想, 706 (1983)
- 松本秀士, "全体新論』に揭載される解剖図の出典について", 日本醫史学雜誌, 55(4) (2009)
- Andrews, Bridie Jane, "The Making of Modern Chinese Medicine, 1895-1937", 박사, pp.1996
- Andrews, B. J., "Wang Qingren and the History of Chinese Anatomy", Journal of Chinese Medicine, 35 (1991)
- Asen, Daniel, "‘Manchu Anatomy’: Anatomical Knowledge and the Jesuits in Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century China", Social History of Medicine, 22(1) (2009)
- Bennett, Adrian A., "John Fryer: The Introduction of Western Science and Technology to China in the Nineteenth Century" (1967), Harvard University Press
- Dikötter, Frank, "Sex, Culture and Modernity in China: Medical Science and the Construction of Sexual Identities in the Early Republican Period" (1995), Univ. of Hawaii Press
- Heinrich, Larissa N., "The Afterlife of Images: Translating the Pathological Body between China and the West" (2009), Tianxia wenhua
- Shaw, J. P., "A History of the Enumeration of the Cranial Nerves by European and British Anatomists From the Time of Galen to 1895, With Comments on Nomenclature", Clinical Anatomy, 5 (1992)
- 신동원, "The Characteristics of Joseon Medicine: Discourses on the Body, Illustration and Dissection", The Review of Korean Studies, 13(1), pp.149~178 (2010), 한국학중앙연구원