의과대학에서 의학사를 어떻게 가르칠 것인가?: 시기, 구성, 교수법
How to Teach History of Medicine at Medical School: Period, Structure, and Teaching Methods
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Currently, the education of the history of medicine in South Korea has established a solid foundation. Since Kim Du-jong (金斗鍾, 1896–1988) began giving medical history lectures at Severance Medical College in 1946, a total of 22 universities-over half of the 40 total universities-have implemented medical history education in the curriculum as of 2023. Furthermore, several textbooks and translations summarizing Western and Korean medical history have been published. However, despite this expansion, there has been little discussion on how to implement medical history education for students. To address this gap, this study examines the period and structure of medical history education, as well as various teaching methods, while considering their respective advantages and disadvantages. Firstly, there are two main approaches to implementing medical history education. One approach integrates medical history throughout the entire educational process, while the other concentrates on specific stages of education. Both approaches extend beyond undergraduate education and encompass medical education after graduation. The former emphasizes integration with basic medical and clinical education, while the latter focuses on ensuring educational coherence. Secondly, the structure of medical history courses can be broadly categorized as chronological or thematic. Within the chronological approach, there are two subcategories: general and periodic. The general method is traditionally used in history education but may be rigid in structure and fail to engage students' interest. On the other hand, the period method conveys multidimensional and comprehensive understanding of different periods but may make it challenging to grasp the overall flow of history, resulting in fragmentation of the course. Thematic structure can be further divided into topic-centered and field-specific methods. Both approaches allow for adjusting the content and arrangement of courses based on student interests and teaching conditions, but they present challenges in maintaining the coherence of the entire course. Lastly, the teaching methods in medical history education can be categorized into traditional lectures, small-group discussions, and individual research guidance. Most medical history courses adopt a lecture-based teaching method, which effectively provides diverse knowledge to medical students who may be unfamiliar with historical research and methodology. However, due to the one-directional nature of the instruction and the passive role of the learners, it can be challenging to stimulate learners' motivation or assess their understanding. Consequently, recent changes try to incorporate active learning through small-group discussions and individual research guidance.
Abstract
Currently, the education of the history of medicine in South Korea has established a solid foundation. Since Kim Du-jong (金斗鍾, 1896–1988) began giving medical history lectures at Severance Medical College in 1946, a total of 22 universities-over half of the 40 total universities-have implemented medical history education in the curriculum as of 2023. Furthermore, several textbooks and translations summarizing Western and Korean medical history have been published. However, despite this expansion, there has been little discussion on how to implement medical history education for students. To address this gap, this study examines the period and structure of medical history education, as well as various teaching methods, while considering their respective advantages and disadvantages. Firstly, there are two main approaches to implementing medical history education. One approach integrates medical history throughout the entire educational process, while the other concentrates on specific stages of education. Both approaches extend beyond undergraduate education and encompass medical education after graduation. The former emphasizes integration with basic medical and clinical education, while the latter focuses on ensuring educational coherence. Secondly, the structure of medical history courses can be broadly categorized as chronological or thematic. Within the chronological approach, there are two subcategories: general and periodic. The general method is traditionally used in history education but may be rigid in structure and fail to engage students' interest. On the other hand, the period method conveys multidimensional and comprehensive understanding of different periods but may make it challenging to grasp the overall flow of history, resulting in fragmentation of the course. Thematic structure can be further divided into topic-centered and field-specific methods. Both approaches allow for adjusting the content and arrangement of courses based on student interests and teaching conditions, but they present challenges in maintaining the coherence of the entire course. Lastly, the teaching methods in medical history education can be categorized into traditional lectures, small-group discussions, and individual research guidance. Most medical history courses adopt a lecture-based teaching method, which effectively provides diverse knowledge to medical students who may be unfamiliar with historical research and methodology. However, due to the one-directional nature of the instruction and the passive role of the learners, it can be challenging to stimulate learners' motivation or assess their understanding. Consequently, recent changes try to incorporate active learning through small-group discussions and individual research guidance.
참고문헌 (40)
- 권복규, "의학교육에서 의료인문학의 가치: 의사학을 중심으로", 의사학, 31(3), pp.495~517 (2022), 대한의사학회[DOI]
- 김선, "교수, 학습방법의 유형과 의학교육에의 적용", 연세의학교육, 3(2), pp.45~54 (2001)
- 김한종, "역사수업의 원리" (2008), 책과함께
- 데니스 쉬밀트, "세계의 역사 교육 논쟁", pp.242~347 (2012), 푸른역사
- 로이 포터, "의학 콘서트" (2007), 예지
- 로이 포터, "의학 : 놀라운 치유의 역사" (2010), 네모북스
- 리처드 슈라이옥, "근세 서양의학사: 그 사회적, 과학적 요인들의 해석" (1999), 위드
- 박승만, "인물사: 의학사 교육을 통한 의학전문직업성 함양의 한 가지 방법", 의학교육논단, 24(1), pp.63~71 (2022), 연세대학교 의과대학
- 박윤재, "한국 근대 의학사 연구의 성과와 전망", 의사학, 19(1), pp.45~68 (2010), 대한의사학회
- 박윤재, "한국현대의료사" (2021), 들녘
- 신동원, "조선의약생활사 : 환자를 중심으로 본 의료 2000년" (2014), 들녘
- 에르빈 아커크네히트, "간추린 서양 의학사 : 서구 사회가 건강과 질병의 관점에서 몸을 이해해가는 과정" (2022), 모티브북
- 여인석, "의과대학 의학사교육의 현황과 과제", 연세의사학, 13(2), pp.7~19 (2010), 의학사연구소
- 여인석, "한국의학사" (2018), 역사공간
- 이상미, "의사학 교육 80년, 역사와 현황", 의사학, 32(1), pp.147~174 (2023), 대한의사학회[DOI]
- 윌리엄 바이넘, "서양의학사" (2017), 교유서가
- 이영효, "역사교육의 내용과 방법", pp.51~94 (2007), 책과함께
- 재컬린 더핀, "의학의 역사: 한 권으로 읽는 서양의학의 역사" (2006), 사이언스북스
- T. V. N. 퍼사우드, "사람 해부학의 역사" (2022), 소리내
- 프레더릭 카트라이트, "질병의 역사" (2004), 가람기획
- 하인츠-페터 슈미데바, "의학사의 새 물결: 한눈에 보는 서양 의료 연구사", pp.127~158 (2022), 모시는사람들
- Barr, Justin, "History of Medicine in the Clerkships: A Novel Model for Integrating Medicine and History", Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 78(1), pp.62~70 (2023)
- Barr, Justin, "Medicine and History: a Surgical Model for National Integration", Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 78(1), pp.114~120 (2023)
- Brody, Howard, "Teaching the History of Medicine by Case Study and Small Group Discussion", Journal of Medical Humanities, 12(1), pp.19~24 (1991)
- Desai, Manisha S., "The Teaching of Anesthesia History in US Residency Programs: Results of a Nationwide Survey", Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 24(2), pp.101~103 (2012)
- Desai, Manisha S., "Alternate Methods to Teach History of Anesthesia", Anesthesia & Analgesia, 118(2), pp.438~447 (2014)
- Dixson, Dante D., "Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom", Theory into Practice, 55(2), pp.153~159 (2016)
- Duffin, Jacalyn, "Infiltrating the Curriculum: An Integrative Approach to History for Medical Students", Journal of Medical Humanities, 16(1), pp.155~174 (1995)
- Duffin, Jacalyn, "Students Matter: The Rewards of University Teaching", pp.74~92 (2012), Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
- Fissell, Mary E., "How I Learned to Love Clickers", Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 90(3), pp.540~542 (2016)
- Hendrickson, Lois, "Teaching with Artifacts and Special Collections", Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 90(1), pp.136~140 (2016)
- Howell, Joel D., "An Elective Course in Medical History", Academic Medicine, 66(1), pp.668~669 (1991)
- Lerner, Barron H., "From Laennec to Lobotomy: Teaching Medical History at Academic Medical Centers", American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 319(5), pp.279~284 (2000)
- Osler, William, "Aequanimitas, with Other Addresses to Medical Students, Nurses and Practitioners of Medicine", pp.327~345 (1932), P. Blakiston’s Son
- Percival, Fred, "A Handbook of Educational Technology" (1988), Kogan Page
- Railean, Elena Aurel, "Assessment, Testing, and Measurement Strategies in Global Higher Education" (2020), IGI Global
- Stromberg, Jannifer, "Some Thoughts about Aging from a Nineteenth-Century Connecticut Yankee", Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 35(1), pp.140~144 (1991)
- Tobbell, Dominique A., "Teaching Medical History with Primary Sources: Introduction", Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 90(1), pp.124~127 (2016)
- Tobbell, Dominique A., "Teaching with Oral Histories", Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 90(1), pp.128~135 (2016)
- Wu, Harry Yi-Jui, "Spatial Relevance: Teaching History to Medical Students at a Medical Museum in Hong Kong", Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 78(1), pp.71~82 (2023)