근대기 의료 윤리로서의 '인술'의 재탄생
A Study on ‘Insul (An Art of Benevolence)’: Formation of Korean Medical Ethics in Modern Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
“Medicine is an art of benevolence [Kr. 인술 Insul, Ch. 仁術 Renshu].” This slogan is widely accepted in East Asia, and at least in South Korea, it is generally regarded as an innate medical ethic. However, the original meaning of ‘In’ (仁, Ch. Ren), which means ‘benevolence,’ ‘humanity,’ or simply ‘love for one another,’ is a Confucian virtue emphasized by Mencius. It is unclear when this Confucian term became the representative medical ethic in South Korea. The term “medical ethic” was not coined until the 19th century in the West (Robert Baker and Laurence B. McCullough, eds. 2009). We often use the terms ‘Insul,’ ‘affection,’ ‘Hippocratic Oath,’ and other related concepts interchangeably, but these words come from different times and have different ideological implications (Shin 2000). This paper examines how ‘Insul’ has been recreated under the tensions between Western and Eastern Medicine in modern Korea. The arrival of Western medicine caused an existential crisis in traditional Korean medicine. The status of TKM doctors was demoted by the ‘Uisaeng Regulation’ in 1913 by the JGGK, which aimed to establish a unicameral medical system based on Western medicine. In response, the scientification of Eastern medicine became an inevitable task, and Eastern medicine had to maintain its identity while also modernizing itself to avoid being absorbed into Western medicine. Until the late Joseon period, ‘Insul’ was rarely used in medicine but rather for political practices. Medical practice was a peripheral way of conducting Ren (仁), the Confucian benevolence. However, TKM rediscovered the concept during the modern era. With the Convention of Korean Uisaeng in October 1915, the TKM community actively used ‘Insul’ as their identity. At this convention, Governor General Terauchi Mastake used the term to mean traditional medicine and implied that without scientification, ‘Insul’ would be disused. This address was immediately and widely quoted in TKM journals. TKM doctors and adherents interpreted his address to mean that if they could achieve scientification of TKM, their medical ideal (Insul) would be used in the future. Soon, a number of articles on ‘Insul’ as a medical ethic were published in newspapers and journals. From the mid-1920s, regardless of whether the doctors practiced East or West medicine, people started to claim that only those who pursued ‘Insul’ were true medical personnel, and they used this as a criterion for evaluating medical doctors. The people’s demand for ‘Insul’ influenced medicine in general, and Western doctors also linked their medical practices to ‘Insul.’ This is an interesting example of the localization of Western medicine in Korea. Through the rivalry relationship or interaction between East and West medicine that took place in modern Korea, ‘Insul’ gradually became a representative term of Korean medical ethics since the mid-1920s. The process took place gradually over a decade, and it has now become firmly established throughout medicine in Korea.
Abstract
“Medicine is an art of benevolence [Kr. 인술 Insul, Ch. 仁術 Renshu].” This slogan is widely accepted in East Asia, and at least in South Korea, it is generally regarded as an innate medical ethic. However, the original meaning of ‘In’ (仁, Ch. Ren), which means ‘benevolence,’ ‘humanity,’ or simply ‘love for one another,’ is a Confucian virtue emphasized by Mencius. It is unclear when this Confucian term became the representative medical ethic in South Korea. The term “medical ethic” was not coined until the 19th century in the West (Robert Baker and Laurence B. McCullough, eds. 2009). We often use the terms ‘Insul,’ ‘affection,’ ‘Hippocratic Oath,’ and other related concepts interchangeably, but these words come from different times and have different ideological implications (Shin 2000). This paper examines how ‘Insul’ has been recreated under the tensions between Western and Eastern Medicine in modern Korea. The arrival of Western medicine caused an existential crisis in traditional Korean medicine. The status of TKM doctors was demoted by the ‘Uisaeng Regulation’ in 1913 by the JGGK, which aimed to establish a unicameral medical system based on Western medicine. In response, the scientification of Eastern medicine became an inevitable task, and Eastern medicine had to maintain its identity while also modernizing itself to avoid being absorbed into Western medicine. Until the late Joseon period, ‘Insul’ was rarely used in medicine but rather for political practices. Medical practice was a peripheral way of conducting Ren (仁), the Confucian benevolence. However, TKM rediscovered the concept during the modern era. With the Convention of Korean Uisaeng in October 1915, the TKM community actively used ‘Insul’ as their identity. At this convention, Governor General Terauchi Mastake used the term to mean traditional medicine and implied that without scientification, ‘Insul’ would be disused. This address was immediately and widely quoted in TKM journals. TKM doctors and adherents interpreted his address to mean that if they could achieve scientification of TKM, their medical ideal (Insul) would be used in the future. Soon, a number of articles on ‘Insul’ as a medical ethic were published in newspapers and journals. From the mid-1920s, regardless of whether the doctors practiced East or West medicine, people started to claim that only those who pursued ‘Insul’ were true medical personnel, and they used this as a criterion for evaluating medical doctors. The people’s demand for ‘Insul’ influenced medicine in general, and Western doctors also linked their medical practices to ‘Insul.’ This is an interesting example of the localization of Western medicine in Korea. Through the rivalry relationship or interaction between East and West medicine that took place in modern Korea, ‘Insul’ gradually became a representative term of Korean medical ethics since the mid-1920s. The process took place gradually over a decade, and it has now become firmly established throughout medicine in Korea.
참고문헌 (83)
- "救急易解方", ~
- "古今圖書集成 醫部全錄", ~
- "董氏小兒斑疹備急方論", ~
- "牧民心書", ~
- "孟子", ~
- "本草綱目", ~
- "鄕藥救急方", ~
- "醫籍考", ~
- "醫宗損益", ~
- "대한매일신보", ~
- "동아일보", ~
- "만세보", ~
- "매일신보", ~
- "부산일보", ~
- "조선신문", ~
- "조선일보", ~
- "한의학대사전" (1998), 정담
- "중앙일보"[URL]
- "한겨레"[URL]
- "학교소개"[URL]
- "네이버 뉴스 라이브러리"[URL]
- "대한민국 신문 아카이브"[URL]
- "조선왕조실록DB"[URL]
- "한국고전종합DB"[URL]
- "한국사데이터베이스"[URL]
- 한글학회, "조선말 큰사전" (1957), 을유문화사
- "한의학고전DB"[URL]
- "百度百科"[URL]
- "大漢和辭典" (1968), 大修館書店
- "아사히 신문"[URL]
- "요미우리 신문"[URL]
- 求新生, "新智識을求라", 동서의학보, 7, pp.1~2 (1917)
- 김영진, "醫師 및 醫業法의 要點", 『東洋醫學』 4·5월호, 4~11
- 별건곤, "誌上移動座談會, 諧謔속에 實情", 별건곤, 28, pp.84~90 (1930)
- 전선의회, "동의보감(東醫報鑑) 제1호" (1917), 전선의회
- 寺内正毅, "寺内總督의 訓示", 『의약월보』 2-10, 62~63 (1915)
- 寺内正毅, "祝辭", 朝鮮醫學會雜誌, (16), pp.2~4 (1916), 조선의학회
- 寺内正毅, "祝辭", 朝鮮醫學會雜誌, (17), pp.1~3 (1917), 조선의학회
- 芳賀榮次郎, "의방강요", pp.1~2 (1917), 조선총독부경무총감부위생과
- ヒマラヤ山人(工藤武城), "京城の醫界", 朝鮮, 14, pp.65~66 (1909)
- 권복규, "전문직 윤리로서의 의료윤리-의사다움이란", 대한소화기학회지, 60(3), pp.135~139 (2012), 대한소화기학회
- 김남일, "근현대 한의학 인물실록" (2011), 들녘
- 김성수, "1910년대 한의학의 전회(轉回) -전통(傳統)에서 회통(匯通)으로의 변환", 공존의 인간학, (3), pp.221~264 (2020), 한국고전학연구소[DOI]
- 김종영, "하이브리드 한의학" (2019), 돌베개
- 김준형, "야담을 통해 본 질병과 의원, 그 시선과 의미", 동양한문학연구, 53, pp.75~117 (2019), 동양한문학회[DOI]
- 김지미, "해방 전후 한의계의 ‘민족의학(民族醫學)’ 담론의 구조와 성격", 석사, pp.2018
- 김호, "허준의 동의보감 연구" (2000), 일지사
- 나인호, "개념사란 무엇인가(E-book)" (2011), 역사비평사
- 래난 길론, "의료윤리" (2005), 아카넷
- 문세영, "조선어사전" (1938), 박문서관
- 박윤재, "한의학 식민지를 앓다" (2008), 아카넷
- 박윤재, "한말·일제 초 근대적 의학체계의 형성과 식민 지배", 박사, 사학, pp.2002
- 박윤재, "한국 근대의학의 기원" (2005), 혜안
- 박윤재, "한국현대의료사(한국의 과학과 문명 018)" (2021), 들녘
- 박윤재, "日帝下 私立 避病院 設立運動 硏究", 의사학, 7(1), pp.37~45 (1998)
- 박형우, "사람을 구하는 집 제중원 : 조선 새로운 의학을 만나다" (2020), 사이언스 북스
- 베른하르트 헤링, "의료윤리" (2006), 가톨릭출판사
- 신동원, "1910년대 일제의 보건의료 정책 - 한의학 정책을 중심으로 -", 한국문화, (30), pp.333~370 (2002), 규장각한국학연구원
- 신동원, "조선시대 의학론", 의사학, 13(1), pp.134~145 (2003)
- 신동원, "한국 의료윤리의 역사적 고찰 : 의사윤리강령(1955-1997)의 분석을 중심으로", 의사학, 9(2), pp.163~204 (2000)
- 앨버트 존슨, "의료윤리의 역사" (2014), 로도스
- 여인석, "한의학 식민지를 앓다" (2018), 아카넷
- 여인석, "한말과 식민지 시기의 서양의학과 한의학 인식과 수용", 의사학, 16(2), pp.161~176 (2007), 대한의사학회
- 여인석, "한국 의사면허제도의 정착과정 - 한말과 일제시대를 중심으로 -", 의사학, 11(2), pp.137~153 (2002), 대한의사학회
- 오모다카 히사유키(澤瀉久敬), "의학, 의술 그리고 의도", 과학사상, 28 (1999)
- 이꽃메, "식민지시기 일반인의 한의학 인식과 의약 이용", 의사학, 15(2), pp.222~231 (2006), 대한의사학회
- 이꽃메, "한의학 식민지를 앓다" (2018), 아카넷
- 이능화, "朝鮮名人傳, 3" (1939), 朝鮮日報社出版部
- 이능화, "(역주)조선불교통사, 6" (2010), 동국대학교출판부
- 이민봉, "금궤비방" (1936), 중앙인서관
- 이병훈, "이광수의 『사랑』과 일제시대 근대병원의 역사적 기록", 의사학, 25(3), pp.407~444 (2016), 대한의사학회[DOI]
- 이종형, "한국현대문화사대계 III" (1977), 고려대학교민족문화연구소
- 조선총독부, "조선어사전" (1920), 조선총독부
- 장원아, "근현대 서울의 공공의료 형성" (2021), 서울역사편찬원
- 줄리아 칭, "유교와 기독교" (1993), 서광사
- 蕭宏恩, "仁心仁術”의 서방 사유 주도 하에서의 현대 의학 - 唐 孫思邈의 <大醫精誠>의 현대적 해석 -", 철학논총, 100(2), pp.219~232 (2020), 새한철학회
- 木村信実, "医業論" (1903), 南江堂
- 松田邦夫, "江戸期における先達の医訓", 日本東洋医学雑誌, 44(3), pp.275~280 (1994)
- G.W. 길모어, "서울 풍물지" (1999), 집문당
- Gale, James, "Korean English Dictionary" (1897), Crosby Lockwood&son
- Doyal, Lesley, "Medicine and Imperialism" (1983), Pluto Press
- 신동원, "“Nationalistic” Acceptance of Sasang Medicine", The Review of Korean Studies, 9(2), pp.143~163 (2006), 한국학중앙연구원
- Underwood, Horace Grant, "A concise dictionary of the Korean language" (1890), Kelly & Walsh
