본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Analysis of Preferences and Reality for Teacher-Student Interaction in Secondary School Science Classroom

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

This study was conducted for the purpose of analyzing the teachers' and students' preferences and reality with regard to their interaction in secondary school science classes. The subjects of this study were 180 teachers and 1,389 students. The contents of the questionnaire for the teachers included the quality of the personal relationships between the teachers and students as well as the teachers' recognition of teaching activities, and the questionnaire for the students dealt with the quality of the personal relationships between the teachers and students as well as the students' perceptions of their classes. The questionnaire responses were divided into preferences and reality for the research. The results are as follows. First, the levels of the teachers' and students' perceptions of their interaction were significantly lower (p<0.05) compared to their preferences with regard to such. Second, the female teachers showed higher levels of preferences and reality compared to the male teachers in the case of the teacher variables, and the middle school teachers showed higher levels of preferences and reality compared to the high school teachers. Third, the male students showed a higher perception level compared to the female students, and both the preferences and reality levels of the middle school students were significantly higher (p<0.05) than those of the high school students. In addition, the level of interaction was lower in big cities than in small cities. Fourth, there was a significant difference between the levels of the teachers' and students' preferences and reality with regard to their interaction.

Abstract

This study was conducted for the purpose of analyzing the teachers' and students' preferences and reality with regard to their interaction in secondary school science classes. The subjects of this study were 180 teachers and 1,389 students. The contents of the questionnaire for the teachers included the quality of the personal relationships between the teachers and students as well as the teachers' recognition of teaching activities, and the questionnaire for the students dealt with the quality of the personal relationships between the teachers and students as well as the students' perceptions of their classes. The questionnaire responses were divided into preferences and reality for the research. The results are as follows. First, the levels of the teachers' and students' perceptions of their interaction were significantly lower (p<0.05) compared to their preferences with regard to such. Second, the female teachers showed higher levels of preferences and reality compared to the male teachers in the case of the teacher variables, and the middle school teachers showed higher levels of preferences and reality compared to the high school teachers. Third, the male students showed a higher perception level compared to the female students, and both the preferences and reality levels of the middle school students were significantly higher (p<0.05) than those of the high school students. In addition, the level of interaction was lower in big cities than in small cities. Fourth, there was a significant difference between the levels of the teachers' and students' preferences and reality with regard to their interaction.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Anderson, E., "Small-Group Discussion in Physics : Peer Interaction Modes in Pair and Fours", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), pp.1099~1114 (1996)
  2. Baker, J. A., "Teacher-student interaction in urban at-risk classrooms: Differential behavior, relationship quality, and student satisfaction with school", The Elementary School Journal, 100(1), pp.57~70 (1999)
  3. Chang, H. P., "The effects of levels of cooperation with in physical science achievement", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), pp.167~181 (1994)
  4. 최경희, "중학교 과학 수업에서 교사와 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1039~1048 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  5. Driver, R., "Constructivist approaches to science teaching, In Constructivism in education", pp.385~400 (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
  6. Duit, R., "Learning in Science-From behaviourism toward social constructivism and beyond, In International handbook of Science Education", pp.3~25 (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  7. Fraser, B. J., "Use of actual-preferred classroom environment scales in person-environment fit research", Journal of educational Psychology, 75, pp.303~313 (1983)
  8. Hogan, K., "Discourse Patterns and CollaborativeScientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-GuidedDissussion", Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), pp.379~432 (1999)
  9. 김현경, "과학고 토론수업을 위한 수업모형 개발과 적용과정에서 나타난 언어적 상호작용의 특징", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(4), pp.359~372 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
  10. Kim, Hyo-Nam, "A Longitudinal Trend Analysis of Affective Characteristics related to Science", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 19(2), pp.194~203 (1999)
  11. Kim, Kyung-Sik, "The relationship between preferred-actual classroom climate perceived by students and academic performance", 박사, pp.1994
  12. Kim, Kyung-Sik, "Improving Classroom Climate through Use of Information about Actual-Preferred Classroom Climate and Its Effects", The Journal of Education Research, 22(2), pp.1~17 (2002)
  13. Kim, Youngshin, "Ecological approach to the causal structure model of scientific thinking development", 박사, pp.2000
  14. 김영선, "초등학교 학생들의 과학 태도 변화에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석", 초등과학교육, 24(3), pp.292~300 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
  15. 곽영순, "초·중등 학생들의 과학 흥미도 조사", 한국지구과학회지, 27(3), pp.260~268 (2006), 한국지구과학회
  16. 김영신, "초?중?고 학생들의 과학 태도 변화에 대한 학습환경의 원인 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1256~1271 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  17. Lanadale, K., "Peer Collabaration Versus Teacher-directed Instruction : How Two Methodologies Engage Students in the learning process", Journal of in childhood education, 13(1), pp.27~32 (1998)
  18. Lee, Hyun-Ju, "The effects of a teaching strategy based on the interactive formative assessment in middle school science class", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(3), pp.479~490 (2000)
  19. Mortimer, E., "Analysing discourse in the science classroom, In Improving science education : the contribution of research", pp.126~142 (2000), Open University Press
  20. 남정희, "멘토링을 통한 초임중등과학교사의 수업에서의교사․학생 상호작용 변화 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(8), pp.953~970 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
  21. National Science Teachers Association, "Guidelines for self-assessment", ~ (1987)
  22. Park, Jong-Yoon, "The Effects of a Teaching Strategy Based on the Interactive Formative Assessment in Middle School Science Class", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(3), pp.468~478 (2000)
  23. 박종윤, "중학교 과학 수업에서 질문과 피드백을 활용한 교사-학생 상호작용 강화 수업 전략의 개발 및 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(2), pp.239~245 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
  24. 박수경, "과학영재학교 교수활동에 관한 학생인식 및 과학수업에서 상호작용 유형", 한국지구과학회지, 26(1), pp.30~40 (2005), 한국지구과학회
  25. Reynalds, A. J., "A structural model of science achievement", Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), pp.97~107 (1991)
  26. Kyoung-Hee Seo, "A Study on the Awareness of Teachers and Students of Teaching and Learning Methods by Instructional Situation - Focusing on the “Stimulus and Reaction” Unit -", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(3), pp.337~352 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
  27. 신애경, "과학 수업에 대한 반성적 사고가 초등 예비교사의 수업 중 언어적 상호작용에 미치는 효과", 초등과학교육, 26(4), pp.428~439 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
  28. Stern, G. G., "Measuring personenvironment congruence in education and industry" (1970), Wiley
  29. Sullivan, P., "Quality mathematics teaching: Describing some key components", Mathematics Education Research Journal, 6(1), pp.4~22 (1994)
  30. Sung, Souk-kyung, "Change and characteristics of verbal interaction in science inquiry experiments emphasizing social interactions", 박사, pp.2005
  31. Weiss, I. R., "Looking inside the classroom-A Study of K-12 Mathematics and Science Education in the United States-" (2003), Horison Research, Inc
  32. Wentzel, K. R. & Watkins, D. E., "Instruction based on peer interactions, In Hand of research on learning and instruction", pp.322~343 (2011), Routledge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)