과학적 창의성 향상을 위한 가족활동(FAISC) 프로그램의 개발과 적용
Development and Application of the Family Activity for Improving Scientific Creativity (FAISC) Program
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구에서는 과학적 창의성 향상을 위한 가족활동(FAISC) 프로그램을 개발하여 실질적인 목적에서프로그램 내용을 구체적으로 제시하였다. 그리고 연구에 참여한 가족구성원들의 프로그램에 대한 반응과적용 중에 나타난 특성을 분석하였다. 설문 결과, 가정에서 수행하기에 과제가 흥미로웠고, 난이도는 약간 어려웠으나, 과제에 제시된 안내가 과제 해결에 도움을 주었다고 응답하였다. 또한 과제 해결 후 과학적창의성이 향상되었다고 응답하였다. 비디오 촬영 및면담 분석 결과, 가족 구성원들이 과제를 수행하고 평가하는 과정에서 여러 가지 긍정적인 측면들이 관찰되었다. 특히 인지적 측면 이외에 가족구성원 사이의대화와 합의의 과정 그리고 즐겁게 참여하는 모습도관찰되었다. 일부 관찰된 부정적인 반응을 통해서는추후 보다 효과적인 적용을 위해 고려할 점이 무엇인지 알 수 있었다. 마지막으로 과제 수행 결과에 대한가족구성원들의 채점 점수가 전문가 채점 점수와 상관이 높은 것으로 나타나, 가족들이 스스로 FAISC를평가하는 데에도 무리가 없을 것으로 판단되었다.
Abstract
In this study, FAISC (Family Activity for Improving Scientific Creativity) program was developed and applied to 12 families. FAISC consists of 12 tasks and 12 evaluation papers. Family participants conducted the task individually and evaluated their performance results through discussion and agreement. From the participants'responses, it was found that FAISC tasks were fun but weakly difficult. Participants responded that Guide 1 (Creative thinking methods) and Guide 2 (Related knowledge) were helpful in their performance, and their scientific creativity was enhanced. From the analysis of interview and video recording of participants' behaviors, various positive aspects were observed. Especially on cognitive aspects, harmonious and pleasant family activities were observed. Negative aspects observed in interview and video gave us a practical guide for more effective performance in further application. Finally, according to comparison of evaluation results by family and professionals, the correlation between them was .901. Therefore, we conclude that evaluation of creative activity by family is highly confidential.
참고문헌 (34)
- 박종원, "과학적 창의성 모델의 제안-인지적 측면을 중심으로-", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), pp.375~386 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 과학적 창의성 활동 자료 개발, "박종원", 학술진흥재단, ~, pp.KRF-2007-721-B00034 (2008)
- 박종원, "과학 영재아의 창의적 과제 수행과정에서의 특성 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(6), pp.770~784 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
- 박종원, "과학적 창의성 지도를 위한 워크숍 방식의 심화 연수 프로그램의 개발과 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(8), pp.1017~1030 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
- 손애향, "과학교사 창의성 국외연수 효과분석 및 연수프로그램 개선 방안", 석사, pp.2004
- 지경준, "과학 창의성 평가문항 유형 개발 및 현장 교사들의 반응 분석", 제59차한국초등과학교육학회 하계 국제학술대회 발표 (2010)
- Amabile, T. M., "Social Psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, pp.997~1013 (1982)
- Amabile, T. M., "Creativity in context: Update to The Social Psychology of Creativity" (1996), Westview Press
- Baer, J., "Generality creativity across performance domains", Creativity Research Journal, 4, pp.23~59 (1991)
- Baer, J., "The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training", Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, pp.183~187 (1996)
- Conti, R., "Evidence to support the componential model of creativity : Secondary analysis of three studies", Creativity Research Journal, 9, pp.358~389 (1996)
- Cropley, A. J., "Creativity" (1967), Longmans, Green
- Gendrop, S. C., "Effect of an intervention in synectics on the creative thinking of nurses", Creativity Research Journal, 9, pp.11~19 (1996)
- Getzels, J. W., "Creativity and Intelligence: Exploration with Gifted Students" (1962), Wiley
- Fleenor, J. W., "Construct validity of three self-report measures of creativity", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, pp.464~470 (1994)
- Gardner, H., "Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligence for the 21st Century" (1999), Basic Books
- Goldsmith, R. E., "Creativity and self-esteem : A multiple operationalization validity study", Journal of Psychology, 122, pp.47~56 (1988)
- Guilford, J. P., "Creativity. Address of the President of the American Psychological Association" (1950), Pennsylvania State College
- Kaufman, J. C., "The amusement park theoretical(APT)model of creativity", Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 14, pp.15~25 (2004)
- Kaufman, J. C., "Do gifted student writers and creative writing experts rate creativity the same way?", Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, pp.260~265 (2005)
- 2009 Revised Curriculum, "Ministry of Education, Science and Technology", MEST, ~ (2009)
- Renzulli, J.S., "New Directions in Creativity" (2000), Creative Learning Press, Inc
- Richards, R., "Everyday creativity: Our hidden potential, In Everyday Creativity and New Views of Human Nature" (2007), American Psychological Association
- Runco, M. A., "The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, pp.483~501 (1985)
- Simonton, D. K., "Creativity in Science: Change, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Torrance, E. P., "Can we teach children to think creatively?", Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(2), pp.114~143 (1972)
- Torrance, E. P., "Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Directions Manual and Scoring Guide (Verbal test booklet A, B)" (1974), Scholastic Testing Service, Inc
- Torrance, E. P., "Teaching for creativity, In Frontiers of Creativity Research", pp.190~215 (1987), Bearly Press
- Weisberg, R., "Creativity: Genius and other myths" (1986), W. H. Freeman and Co
- Wallach, M. A., "Modes of Thinking in Young Children" (1965), Holt, Rinehart, & Winstom
- Ma, H. H., "A synthetic analysis of the effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs", Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), pp.435~446 (2006)
- Adullah Aljughaiman, "Teachers’conceptions of creativity and creative students", Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(1), pp.17~34 (2005)
- Park, S., "Change in Korean science teachers’ perceptions of creativity and science teaching after participating in an overseas professional development program", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, pp.37~64 (2006)
- Hansen, J. B., "Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students", Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(3), pp.115~121 (1994)