공안체시(公安體詩)의 특성과 의의
A Study of the Characteristics and Significance of the Gong-an style poetry
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article explores the meaning and characteristics of the Gong-an style in several ways. First, this article refines the existing discussion on the Gong-an style. Second, it explores the similarities between the members of the Gong-an school and the Gong-an style. Third, it establishes the significance of the Gong-an style based on its critiques by literati in the 1600’s and later impact it had on Chinese poetry. The Gong-an style is clearly manifested seen in the works of Yuan, Hong-dao. In his poems, contained in Ji-fan ji and Jie-tuo ji, Hong-dao demonstrates his use of the Gong-an style by using plain language, so that the reader can clearly understand the themes of the poem without difficulty, to describe the little things of everyday life. A chief goal of the Gong-an style was to breakaway from the conventional informal style of the time. As a result, the works of early authors like Yuan, Hong-Dao became a model among the literati of the Gong-an school. The key feature of the Gong-an style is the use of plain and calm language to describe thoughts and feelings according to the respective circumstances. Notwithstanding the Gong-an school’s breakup, the Gong-an style’s influence continues to remain in literary circles. Yet the Gong-an style has been misunderstood as a style in which one can easily write a poem without knowledge or talent. Consequently, many people who have attempted to replicate the Gong-an style have sued vulgar words without much thought, which has led to the mass production of mediocre poems. This has caused a huge backlash among the followers of the Gong-an school, causing it to retreat back into literary circles.
Abstract
This article explores the meaning and characteristics of the Gong-an style in several ways. First, this article refines the existing discussion on the Gong-an style. Second, it explores the similarities between the members of the Gong-an school and the Gong-an style. Third, it establishes the significance of the Gong-an style based on its critiques by literati in the 1600’s and later impact it had on Chinese poetry. The Gong-an style is clearly manifested seen in the works of Yuan, Hong-dao. In his poems, contained in Ji-fan ji and Jie-tuo ji, Hong-dao demonstrates his use of the Gong-an style by using plain language, so that the reader can clearly understand the themes of the poem without difficulty, to describe the little things of everyday life. A chief goal of the Gong-an style was to breakaway from the conventional informal style of the time. As a result, the works of early authors like Yuan, Hong-Dao became a model among the literati of the Gong-an school. The key feature of the Gong-an style is the use of plain and calm language to describe thoughts and feelings according to the respective circumstances. Notwithstanding the Gong-an school’s breakup, the Gong-an style’s influence continues to remain in literary circles. Yet the Gong-an style has been misunderstood as a style in which one can easily write a poem without knowledge or talent. Consequently, many people who have attempted to replicate the Gong-an style have sued vulgar words without much thought, which has led to the mass production of mediocre poems. This has caused a huge backlash among the followers of the Gong-an school, causing it to retreat back into literary circles.
참고문헌 (32)
- 禹在鎬, "袁宏道詩歌연구", 박사, 문학, pp.1995
- 이기면, "원굉도 문학사상" (2007), 한국학술정보
- 이주현, "공안파(公安派)의 시론 다시 읽기 - 마음의 시화(詩化) 과정에 대한 점검", 중국문학, 86, pp.25~44 (2016), 한국중국어문학회
- 이주현, "칭송과 동경, 그리고 새 방향의 모색 ― 원굉도(袁宏道)의 서위(徐渭) 시 수용에 관한 고찰", 중국어문논총, (68), pp.103~134 (2015), 중국어문연구회
- 이지, "분서 1⋅2" (2004), 한길사
- 원굉도, "역주 원중랑집" (2004), 소명출판
- 장파, "동양과 서양, 그리고 미학" (1999), 푸른숲
- 江盈科, "江盈科集" (1997), 岳麓書社
- 陶望齡, "陶文簡公集(明天啓七年陶履中刻本)", 中國基本古籍庫, ~
- 袁宏道, "袁宏道集箋校" (2008), 上海古籍出版社
- 袁宗道, "白蘇齋類集" (2007), 上海古籍出版社
- 袁中道, "珂雪齋集" (1989), 上海古籍出版社
- 李贄, "《焚書》(明刻本)", 中國基本古籍庫, ~
- 王禮培, "小招隠館談藝録初編 (民國本)", 中國基本古籍庫, ~
- 錢謙益, "<袁稽勳宏道>, 列朝詩集 (清順治九年毛氏汲古閣刻本)", 中國基本古籍庫, ~
- 賈宗普, "公安派成員考", 廊坊師範學院學報, 22(4) (2006)
- 郭小微, "論袁宗道與公安派的開創", 理論觀察, (2) (2013)
- 戴紅賢, "袁宏道與晩明性靈文學思潮硏究" (2012), 武漢大學出版社
- 孟祥榮, "論袁宏道思想的自我轉變及其文化意義", 雲夢學刊, 22(4) (2001)
- 孟祥榮, "公安派形成時間和原因的考察", 荊門職業技術學院學報, 15(5) (2000)
- 謝素萍, "袁宏道前後期文學思想的變化及其成因初探", 飛天, (4) (2009), 甘肅省文聯
- 宋俊玲, "公安派硏究", 博士, pp.2004
- 梁新榮, "袁宏道前期詩文理論述評", 新彊職業大學學報, 16(2) (2008)
- 王承丹, "試論袁宏道前期的詩文理論", 齊魯學刊, (6) (1996)
- 韋珮華, "公安派北京時期(公元1598至1600年)硏究", 碩士, pp.2012
- 李鳴, "袁宏道思想轉變原因初探", 南昌大學學報(人社版), 35(4) (2004)
- 李鳴, "袁宏道的詩歌創作歷程", 廣州城市職業學院學報, 5(4) (2011)
- 李斌, "袁宏道後期詩文理論述評", 湖北民族學院學報 (哲學社會科學版), 20(2) (2002)
- 李聖華, "論竟陵體", 山東師範大學學報 (人文社會科學版), 50(5) (2005)
- 張永剛, "晩明“狂禪”運動與公安派的興衰", 昆明理工大學學報 (社會科學版), 8(4) (2008)
- 左東嶺, "李贄與晚明文學思想" (1997), 天津人民出版社
- 吉川幸次郞, "元明詩槪說" (1986), 幼獅文化事業公司
