본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공안체시(公安體詩)의 특성과 의의

A Study of the Characteristics and Significance of the Gong-an style poetry

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This article explores the meaning and characteristics of the Gong-an style in several ways. First, this article refines the existing discussion on the Gong-an style. Second, it explores the similarities between the members of the Gong-an school and the Gong-an style. Third, it establishes the significance of the Gong-an style based on its critiques by literati in the 1600’s and later impact it had on Chinese poetry. The Gong-an style is clearly manifested seen in the works of Yuan, Hong-dao. In his poems, contained in Ji-fan ji and Jie-tuo ji, Hong-dao demonstrates his use of the Gong-an style by using plain language, so that the reader can clearly understand the themes of the poem without difficulty, to describe the little things of everyday life. A chief goal of the Gong-an style was to breakaway from the conventional informal style of the time. As a result, the works of early authors like Yuan, Hong-Dao became a model among the literati of the Gong-an school. The key feature of the Gong-an style is the use of plain and calm language to describe thoughts and feelings according to the respective circumstances. Notwithstanding the Gong-an school’s breakup, the Gong-an style’s influence continues to remain in literary circles. Yet the Gong-an style has been misunderstood as a style in which one can easily write a poem without knowledge or talent. Consequently, many people who have attempted to replicate the Gong-an style have sued vulgar words without much thought, which has led to the mass production of mediocre poems. This has caused a huge backlash among the followers of the Gong-an school, causing it to retreat back into literary circles.

Abstract

This article explores the meaning and characteristics of the Gong-an style in several ways. First, this article refines the existing discussion on the Gong-an style. Second, it explores the similarities between the members of the Gong-an school and the Gong-an style. Third, it establishes the significance of the Gong-an style based on its critiques by literati in the 1600’s and later impact it had on Chinese poetry. The Gong-an style is clearly manifested seen in the works of Yuan, Hong-dao. In his poems, contained in Ji-fan ji and Jie-tuo ji, Hong-dao demonstrates his use of the Gong-an style by using plain language, so that the reader can clearly understand the themes of the poem without difficulty, to describe the little things of everyday life. A chief goal of the Gong-an style was to breakaway from the conventional informal style of the time. As a result, the works of early authors like Yuan, Hong-Dao became a model among the literati of the Gong-an school. The key feature of the Gong-an style is the use of plain and calm language to describe thoughts and feelings according to the respective circumstances. Notwithstanding the Gong-an school’s breakup, the Gong-an style’s influence continues to remain in literary circles. Yet the Gong-an style has been misunderstood as a style in which one can easily write a poem without knowledge or talent. Consequently, many people who have attempted to replicate the Gong-an style have sued vulgar words without much thought, which has led to the mass production of mediocre poems. This has caused a huge backlash among the followers of the Gong-an school, causing it to retreat back into literary circles.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 禹在鎬, "袁宏道詩歌연구", 박사, 문학, pp.1995
  2. 이기면, "원굉도 문학사상" (2007), 한국학술정보
  3. 이주현, "공안파(公安派)의 시론 다시 읽기 - 마음의 시화(詩化) 과정에 대한 점검", 중국문학, 86, pp.25~44 (2016), 한국중국어문학회
  4. 이주현, "칭송과 동경, 그리고 새 방향의 모색 ― 원굉도(袁宏道)의 서위(徐渭) 시 수용에 관한 고찰", 중국어문논총, (68), pp.103~134 (2015), 중국어문연구회
  5. 이지, "분서 1⋅2" (2004), 한길사
  6. 원굉도, "역주 원중랑집" (2004), 소명출판
  7. 장파, "동양과 서양, 그리고 미학" (1999), 푸른숲
  8. 江盈科, "江盈科集" (1997), 岳麓書社
  9. 陶望齡, "陶文簡公集(明天啓七年陶履中刻本)", 中國基本古籍庫, ~
  10. 袁宏道, "袁宏道集箋校" (2008), 上海古籍出版社
  11. 袁宗道, "白蘇齋類集" (2007), 上海古籍出版社
  12. 袁中道, "珂雪齋集" (1989), 上海古籍出版社
  13. 李贄, "《焚書》(明刻本)", 中國基本古籍庫, ~
  14. 王禮培, "小招隠館談藝録初編 (民國本)", 中國基本古籍庫, ~
  15. 錢謙益, "<袁稽勳宏道>, 列朝詩集 (清順治九年毛氏汲古閣刻本)", 中國基本古籍庫, ~
  16. 賈宗普, "公安派成員考", 廊坊師範學院學報, 22(4) (2006)
  17. 郭小微, "論袁宗道與公安派的開創", 理論觀察, (2) (2013)
  18. 戴紅賢, "袁宏道與晩明性靈文學思潮硏究" (2012), 武漢大學出版社
  19. 孟祥榮, "論袁宏道思想的自我轉變及其文化意義", 雲夢學刊, 22(4) (2001)
  20. 孟祥榮, "公安派形成時間和原因的考察", 荊門職業技術學院學報, 15(5) (2000)
  21. 謝素萍, "袁宏道前後期文學思想的變化及其成因初探", 飛天, (4) (2009), 甘肅省文聯
  22. 宋俊玲, "公安派硏究", 博士, pp.2004
  23. 梁新榮, "袁宏道前期詩文理論述評", 新彊職業大學學報, 16(2) (2008)
  24. 王承丹, "試論袁宏道前期的詩文理論", 齊魯學刊, (6) (1996)
  25. 韋珮華, "公安派北京時期(公元1598至1600年)硏究", 碩士, pp.2012
  26. 李鳴, "袁宏道思想轉變原因初探", 南昌大學學報(人社版), 35(4) (2004)
  27. 李鳴, "袁宏道的詩歌創作歷程", 廣州城市職業學院學報, 5(4) (2011)
  28. 李斌, "袁宏道後期詩文理論述評", 湖北民族學院學報 (哲學社會科學版), 20(2) (2002)
  29. 李聖華, "論竟陵體", 山東師範大學學報 (人文社會科學版), 50(5) (2005)
  30. 張永剛, "晩明“狂禪”運動與公安派的興衰", 昆明理工大學學報 (社會科學版), 8(4) (2008)
  31. 左東嶺, "李贄與晚明文學思想" (1997), 天津人民出版社
  32. 吉川幸次郞, "元明詩槪說" (1986), 幼獅文化事業公司

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)