解經과 解字 — 프레마르 《六書實義》를 통해 본 예수회의 中國 專有
Interpreting Jing(經) and Zi(字): Jesuit appropriation of China through Prémare’s Liushushiyi(六書實義)
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Joseph Henri-Marie de Prémare(1666~1736) is a French Jesuit missionary in China from the late 17c to the early 18c. His Lishushiyi(六 書實義) represents the so-called figurism in the China Mission in that age. In the essay, Prémare uses liushu(六書), the six classes of Chinese written character created by Xu Shen(許愼) and Chinese Confucian classics like Yijing(易經), to argue that the Christian Dogmas have existed in China. He insists on zhishi(指事) class, because, he thinks, seven characters of that class represents Christian dogmas of trinity and incarnation. A Chinese catholic christian Liu Ying(劉凝)’s studies on Chinese characters helps him. Figurist views on Chinese written character and Yijing were agreed neither in Prémare’s age and are agreed nor today. But Prémare’s concerns and studies on Chinese traditional classicism and character, as a kind of missionary accommodation, are still valid. His appropriation of Chinese scholarly tradition is a pioneering work in the Western knowledge of China, and more narrolwy, in the field of Sinology.
Abstract
Joseph Henri-Marie de Prémare(1666~1736) is a French Jesuit missionary in China from the late 17c to the early 18c. His Lishushiyi(六 書實義) represents the so-called figurism in the China Mission in that age. In the essay, Prémare uses liushu(六書), the six classes of Chinese written character created by Xu Shen(許愼) and Chinese Confucian classics like Yijing(易經), to argue that the Christian Dogmas have existed in China. He insists on zhishi(指事) class, because, he thinks, seven characters of that class represents Christian dogmas of trinity and incarnation. A Chinese catholic christian Liu Ying(劉凝)’s studies on Chinese characters helps him. Figurist views on Chinese written character and Yijing were agreed neither in Prémare’s age and are agreed nor today. But Prémare’s concerns and studies on Chinese traditional classicism and character, as a kind of missionary accommodation, are still valid. His appropriation of Chinese scholarly tradition is a pioneering work in the Western knowledge of China, and more narrolwy, in the field of Sinology.
참고문헌 (24)
- 馬若瑟, "六書實義, 法國國家圖書館明淸天主敎文獻第二十五冊" (2009), 利氏學社
- 馬若瑟, "儒敎實義, 天主教東傳文獻續編(三)" (1966), 學生書局
- "儒交信"[URL]
- 馬若瑟, "經傳衆說, 法國國家圖書館明淸天主敎文獻第二十六冊" (2009), 利氏學社
- "經傳議論"[URL]
- 馬若瑟, "天學總論, 法國國家圖書館明淸天主敎文獻第二十六冊" (2009), 利氏學社
- Joseph Henri-Marie de Prémare, "Vestiges des principaux dogmes chrétiens tirés de anciens livres chinois" (1878), Bureau des Annales de Philosophie Chrétienne
- Joseph Henri-Marie de Prémare, "Notitia Lingauge Sinicae" (1831), cura Academiae anglo-sinensis
- Joseph Henri-Marie de Prémare, "Notitia Lingauge Sinicae" (1831), cura Academiae anglo-sinensis
- Joseph Henri-Marie de Prémare, "The Notitia Linguae Sinicae" (1847), The Office of Chinese Repository
- G. Pauthier, "Lettre Inédite du P. Prémare sur le Monothéisme des Chinois" (1861), Benjamin Duprat
- 鄭釴修, "江西省南豐縣志 (三)" (1989), 成文出版社有限公司
- Cécile Leung, "Étienne Fourmont, 1683-1745: Oriental and Chinese Languages in Eighteenth Century France" (1991), Leuven University Press
- David Porter, "Ideographia: The Chinese Cipher in Early Modern Europe" (2001), Stanford University Press
- Paul A. Rule, "K’ung-tzu or Confucius?: The Jesuit interpretation of Confucianism" (1986), Allen & Unwin
- Knud Kundbæk, "Joseph de Prémare(1666-1736), S.J.: Chinese Philology and Figurism" (1991), Aarhus University
- Nicolas Standaert, "Handbook of Christianity in China, v.1, 635-1800" (2001), Brill
- 張西平, "淸代來華傳敎士馬若瑟硏究", 淸史硏究, (2), pp.40~47 (2009)
- 祝平一, "經傳衆說-馬若瑟的中國經學史", 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所輯刊, 78(3) (2007)
- 龍伯格, "淸代來華傳敎士馬若瑟硏究" (2009), 大象出版社
- Arnold H. Rowbotham, "The Jesuit Figurist and Eighteenth-Century Religious Thought", Journal of the History of Ideas, 17(4), pp.471~485 (1956)
- Michael Lackner, "China and Europe: Images and Influences in Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries" (1991), Chinese University Press
- 이연승, "예수회 색은주의 선교사들의 유교 이해", 종교와 문화, (17), pp.33~66 (2009), 종교문제연구소
- 박동천, "라이프니츠의 이신론적 기독교관과 색은주의 유교관의 상호 영향", 정치사상연구, 20(1), pp.37~64 (2014), 한국정치사상학회