基於缺省邏輯的函數推理
Functional Reasoning Based on default logic
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The research on Default in linguistic had a long history, and the terminologies used to define this phenomenon have also been verified, but better widely known as Omission. Even not a small number of the researchers ignored the difference and mixed them in usage, but in this research paper, it was found that there had been substantial difference in between. Omission is more Grammarian-based method, while Default is more Pragmatics-based method. In this applied linguistics prevailing era, the research on Omission is no longer focus on the analysis or reasonable explanation of those grammarian rules, weakening the status of Omission syntax. The conveying of information is not only through the grammar but also, or saying in a bigger portion, through the speculation during the real communication and the cognitive context behind it. The Default Function could explain this finding brief and to the point. In this paper it started with a detailed inference from the previous research on the definition of Default Function, adding the prosody component and Paralinguistic Features into “D”, redefining the scope of Paralinguistic Features, so as to revise the function for a better expression of the Default phenomenon. It is known by now, there has not been much research on this topic, and this is also the first paper on the revision and intensification of Default Function in linguistic. Hopefully the research on Default in cognitive context in this paper could make some contribution in opening the black box for further understanding our human’s brain.
Abstract
The research on Default in linguistic had a long history, and the terminologies used to define this phenomenon have also been verified, but better widely known as Omission. Even not a small number of the researchers ignored the difference and mixed them in usage, but in this research paper, it was found that there had been substantial difference in between. Omission is more Grammarian-based method, while Default is more Pragmatics-based method. In this applied linguistics prevailing era, the research on Omission is no longer focus on the analysis or reasonable explanation of those grammarian rules, weakening the status of Omission syntax. The conveying of information is not only through the grammar but also, or saying in a bigger portion, through the speculation during the real communication and the cognitive context behind it. The Default Function could explain this finding brief and to the point. In this paper it started with a detailed inference from the previous research on the definition of Default Function, adding the prosody component and Paralinguistic Features into “D”, redefining the scope of Paralinguistic Features, so as to revise the function for a better expression of the Default phenomenon. It is known by now, there has not been much research on this topic, and this is also the first paper on the revision and intensification of Default Function in linguistic. Hopefully the research on Default in cognitive context in this paper could make some contribution in opening the black box for further understanding our human’s brain.
참고문헌 (26)
- 侯学超, "现代汉语虚词词典" (1998), 北京大学出版社
- 刘月华, "实用现代汉语语法" (2001), 商务印书馆
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1999), 商务印书馆
- 马庆株, "自主动词和非自主动词", 中国语言学报, (3) (1988), 商务印书馆
- 王还, "对外汉语教学语法大纲" (1995), 北京语言学院出版社
- 邢福义, "邢福义自选集" (1999), 大象出版社
- 许晓宇, "“快XP了”结构解析", 硕士, pp.2012
- 张斌, "现代汉语虚词词典" (2006), 商务印书馆
- 张万禾, "现代汉语的将来时范畴", 汉语学习, (5), pp.27~34 (2008)
- 张谊生, "现代汉语虚词" (2000), 华东师范大学出版社
- 朱德熙, "语法讲义" (2004), 商务印书馆
- 周禮全, "邏輯一正確思維和有效交際的理論" (1994), 人民出版社
- 邵敬敏, "省略句與非主謂句新說", 語文學習, (7), pp.26~28 (1991)
- 王路, "邏輯、語言與思維" (2002), 中國科學文化出版社
- 範開泰, "省略、隱含、暗示", 語言教學與研究, (2), pp.20~32 (1990)
- 羅 琴, "古代漢語省略的語用分析", 重慶師範學院學報, (2), pp.12~18 (1989)
- 威爾伯, "傳播學概論" (1994), 新華出版社
- 高海龍, "語用推理中的缺省邏輯與常規關系", 國際關係學院學報, (2), pp.116~ (2011)
- 王以亮, "省略邏輯、自治邏輯及其統一", 思維與智慧, (3), pp.3~ (1992)
- 劉煥輝, "語境研究論文集", pp.441~ (1992), 北京語言學院出版社
- 劉鑫, "關鍵詞檢測系統中聲學置信度的應用", 計算機工程, (8), pp.30~ (2004)
- 黃華新, "缺省推理:認知語境的功能實現", 信陽師範學院學報, (2), pp.1~3 (2004)
- 張韌弦, "基於缺省邏輯的一般會話含義例證的形式處理", 當代語言學, (2), pp.158~167 (2008)
- 袁毓琳, "語言的認知研究和計算分析", pp.141~ (1998), 北京大學出版社
- Langacker, "《Foundations of Cognitive Grammar》,Vol. II: Descriptive Application" (1991), Stanford University Press
- Lobke, "The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis" (2010), John Benjamins Pub. Co
