본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등학생을 위한 과학인성 검사 도구 개발

Development of Survey Tool for the Scientific Character of Elementary Student

임성민|남일균
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2018.12|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제38권 제6호|pp. 825-838|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.6.825

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

요인분석인성교육factor analysischaracter education과학인성초등학생 과학인성 검사 도구scientific characterScientific Character Inventory for Elementary Student
주제분류교육학

초록

이 연구는 초등학교 과학 교수학습 맥락에서 발현되는 초등학생의 인성적 특성을 파악하여 과학교육과 인성교육을 효과적으로 접목 하는 초등학생용 과학인성 측정 도구를 개발하려는 목적으로 수행되 었다. 이를 위해 과학인성을 구체적인 과학 교수학습의 맥락에서 실천할 수 있는 역량으로 정의하는 선행연구의 이론적 모형을 차용하 였으며, 이에 기반하여 초등학생의 과학 교수학습 맥락 속에서 추구 하는 덕목을 실천 할 수 있는 역량을 측정하는 ‘초등학생 과학인성 검사 도구’를 개발하고, 개발한 검사 도구의 타당성과 신뢰성을 검증 하였다. 탐색적 및 확인적 요인분석 결과 초등학생 과학인성 검사 도구는 과학적 문제해결능력, 자기관리역량, 자기성찰역량, 의사소 통역량, 대인관계역량, 공동체참여역량, 세계시민의식, 환경윤리의식 등의 8개 하위 구인으로 구성됨을 확인하였고 문항은 최종 28개 문항으로 정리되었다. 최종 정리된 과학인성 검사 도구의 각 하위 구인별 신뢰도 계수는 최소 0.5 이상이고 검사 도구 전체로는 0.878 의 신뢰도 지수를 나타내며, 산출된 하위 구인들과 전체 과학인성 점수 사이에 양호한 수준에서 상관이 있음을 확인하였다. 이러한 결과는 이 연구에서 개발한 검사 도구가 과학인성교육의 성과를 평가 하는 도구로서 유용할 수 있음을 보여준다. 이 연구는 과학교과를 통해 기를 수 있는 인성의 구인들을 구체적인 과학 교수학습 맥락을 고려하여 체계적으로 밝히고 이를 평가하는 도구를 제안했다는 점에서 의미 있다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a survey tool of scientific character for elementary student which connects science education and character education effectively by figuring out traits of elementary students’ character being presented in teaching and learning context of elementary school science. For this, we adapted the theocratical model from the previous research which defined scientific character as the competencies being able to practice in concrete teaching and learning context of science. Based on this model, we developed the survey tool as ‘Scientific Character Inventory for Elementary Student’ to assess elementary students’ scientific character as the competences to practice the virtues being pursued in the context of elementary school science and verified its reliability and validity. As a result of an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, we confirmed all the items could be summarized into 28 items and eight constructs such as scientific problem-solving, self-management, self-reflection, communication, interpersonal skill, community participation, global citizenship, and environmental ethics awareness. We found that minimum reliability coefficient of constructs was over than 0.5 and reliability coefficient of the total items was 0.878. And also, there was modest relationship between each construct and the total score of scientific character. These results show that the developed survey tool can be useful in evaluating the effectiveness of science character education. This study is meaningful in that it systematically reveals constructs of scientific character which can be raised in concrete context of science teaching and learning so as to suggest the survey tool to assess this.

참고문헌 (83)

  1. Bailey, L. H., "The nature-study idea : Being an interpretation of the new school movement to put the child in sympathy with nature" (1903), Doubleday, Page & Company
  2. Berkowitz, M., "Aligning Assessments in character education :Integrating outcome, implementation strategies, and assessment", Paper presented at the conference of Jubilee Centre (2014)
  3. Berkowitz, M. W., "The role of moral reasoning on semiscientific issues and discourse in science education", pp.117~138 (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  4. Bourdieu, P., "Distinction : A social critique of the judgement of taste" (1986), Routledge & Kegan Paul
  5. Nancy W. Brickhouse, "Young women's scientific identity formation in an urban context", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), pp.965~980 (2001), Wiley[DOI]
  6. Chalmers, A., "What is this thing called science?: An assessment of the nature and status of science and its method" (1982), University of Queensland Press
  7. Fanny M. Cheung, "Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture.", American Psychologist, 66(7), pp.593~603 (2011), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  8. 지은림, "인성측정도구 개발 및 타당화", 윤리교육연구, (35), pp.151~174 (2014), 한국윤리교육학회
  9. Mei-Hung Chiu, "Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), pp.670~697 (2011), Wiley[DOI]
  10. Colby, A., "Competence and character through life" (1998), The University of Chicago Press
  11. Corrigan, D., "The re-emergence of values in science education" (2007), Sense Publishers
  12. Ruth Coulson, "Development of an instrument for measuring attitudes of early childhood educators towards science", Research in Science Education, 22(1), pp.101~105 (1992), Springer Nature[DOI]
  13. Cunningham, C. A., "Character psychology and character education", pp.166~201 (2005), University of Notre Dame Press
  14. Jacinta Dalgety, "Development of chemistry attitudes and experiences questionnaire (CAEQ)", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), pp.649~668 (2003), Wiley[DOI]
  15. Douglas, H., "Science, policy, and the value-free ideal" (2009), University of Pittsburgh Press
  16. Wenjie Duan, "Factor Structure of the Chinese Virtues Questionnaire", Research on Social Work Practice, 22(6), pp.680~688 (2012), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  17. Charles J. Eick, "Use of the Outdoor Classroom and Nature-Study to Support Science and Literacy Learning: A Narrative Case Study of a Third-Grade Classroom", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), pp.789~803 (2017), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  18. Catherine Elgin, "Science, ethics and education", School Field, 9(3), pp.251~263 (2011), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  19. Field, A., "Discovering statistics using SPSS: Introducing statistical method" (2009), Sage Publications
  20. Blaine J. Fowers, "Toward programmatic research on virtue assessment: Challenges and prospects", School Field, 12(3), pp.309~328 (2014), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  21. Barry J. Fraser, "Development of a test of science-related attitudes", Science Education, 62(4), pp.509~515 (1978), Wiley[DOI]
  22. Elizabeth Goldsmith-Conley, "School Culture before Character Education: A Model for Change", Action in Teacher Education, 20(4), pp.48~58 (1999), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  23. Gorsuch, R. L., "Factor analysis" (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  24. GERALD J. HAEFFEL, "Self-Report: Psychology’s Four-Letter Word", The American Journal of Psychology, 123(2), pp.181~ (2010), University of Illinois Press[DOI]
  25. Harrison, T., "Assessing interventions designed to improve understanding of virtues", Paper presented at the conference of Jubilee Centre (2014)
  26. Derek Hodson, "Time for action: Science education for an alternative future", International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), pp.645~670 (2003), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  27. 홍혜정, "과학 교과에 적용되는 창의·인성 교육에 대한 교사들의 인식", 교과교육학연구, 16(4), pp.887~908 (2012), 교과교육연구소[DOI]
  28. Hwang, J., (1998), Gyoyukgwahacsa
  29. 현주, "한국 초·중등학생을 위한 인성검사 개발 및 타당화", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 29(1), pp.83~106 (2015), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
  30. Jeong, C., "Theories and practices of character education" (2015), Kyoyookgwahaksa
  31. 정선혜, "실천적 수학영재성에 대한 초등학생의 자기평가와 교사의 관찰평가 비교연구", 교육평가연구, 24(3), pp.549~565 (2011), 한국교육평가학회
  32. Johnson, K., "The nature-study movement", Green Teacher, 99, pp.16~20 (2013)
  33. 정운기, "과학 인성 지도에 대한 과학교사들의 인식 조사", 새물리, 68(6), pp.611~622 (2018), 한국물리학회
  34. 강유진, "과학교육에서 인성교육의 필요성 및 인성의 구인에 대한 전문가의 인식", 한국과학교육학회지, 38(4), pp.555~563 (2018), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  35. Kim, S., (2015), Hakjisa
  36. 김성덕, "초등학생들의 과학윤리성을 측정하기 위한 검사도구 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 36(1), pp.1~13 (2016), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  37. Kline, P., "An easy guide to factor analysis" (1994), Routledge
  38. Krosnick, H. A., "Survey measurement and process quality", pp.141~152 (1997), John Wiley & Sons
  39. Kwon, J., "The development and effect of collaborative problemsolving instruction model for improving character competence in science education", Doctoral, pp.2017
  40. 권미진, "인성평가를 위한 자기평가, 교사관찰평가, 인성교육활동 내 관찰평가 비교연구", 윤리교육연구, (44), pp.157~190 (2017), 한국윤리교육학회[DOI]
  41. "Korean Educational Development Institute", Korean Educational Development Institute, ~ (2014)
  42. "Korean Educational Development Institute", 2014
  43. "Korean Educational Development Institute", Korean Educational Development Institute, ~ (2015)
  44. Lee, H., "A investigation of method effects associated with negatively worded items and positively worded items on self-report surveys", Doctoral, pp.2012
  45. 이윤선, "대학생 인성 검사도구 타당화 연구", 윤리교육연구, (31), pp.261~282 (2013), 한국윤리교육학회
  46. J. L. Lemke, "Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), pp.296~316 (2001), Wiley[DOI]
  47. Lickona, T., "A more complex analysis is needed", Phi Delta Kappan, 79(6), pp.449~455 (1998)
  48. 임유나, "2015 개정 교육과정의 핵심역량과 교과의 관계성 분석: 언어 네트워크 분석을 활용하여", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(10), pp.749~771 (2016), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  49. Lind, K. K., "Exploring science in early childhood: A developmental approach" (1991), Delmar Publishers Inc
  50. "Ministry of Education, Science and Technology", Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, ~ (2012)
  51. 남일균, "과학교육에서 인성 관련 연구의 동향 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(3), pp.493~505 (2017), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  52. NGSS Lead States, "Next generation science standards" (2013), National Academies Press
  53. OECD, "Definition and selection of competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundation" (2003), OECD Press
  54. Jonathan Osborne, "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), pp.994~1020 (2004), Wiley[DOI]
  55. Daphna Oyserman, "Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.", Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), pp.3~72 (2002), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  56. 박종덕, "인성교육과 교과교육: 인성교육은 가능하고 필요한가?", 도덕교육연구, 26(1), pp.177~194 (2014), 한국도덕교육학회
  57. 박성미, "청소년용 통합적 인성 척도 개발", 아동교육, 21(3), pp.35~47 (2012), 한국아동교육학회[DOI]
  58. Nansook Park, "Character Strengths and Happiness among Young Children: Content Analysis of Parental Descriptions", Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), pp.323~341 (2006), Springer Nature[DOI]
  59. 박상민, "‘자연을 통한 과학학습’을 위한 Nature-Study 교육방법 고찰", 대한화학회지, 59(1), pp.45~53 (2015), 대한화학회[DOI]
  60. Robert T. Pennock, "Developing a Scientific Virtue-Based Approach to Science Ethics Training", Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), pp.243~262 (2017), Springer Nature[DOI]
  61. Pennock, R. T., "Fostering a culture of scientific integrity: legalistic vs. Scientific virtue-based approaches", Professional Ethics Report, 28(2), pp.1~3 (2015)[DOI]
  62. Pimple, K. D., "Six domains of research ethics : A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research", Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, pp.191~205 (2002)
  63. Posey, J., "Eleven Principles sourcebook: How to achieve quality education in P-12 schools" (2003), Character Education Partnership
  64. QCA, "The national curriculum : UK lower secondary(k3)curriculum materials and science education reform in the USA", Studies in Science Education, 37, pp.107~135 (2007)
  65. Ravid, R., "Practical statistics for educators" (1994), University Press of America
  66. Michael J. Reiss, "Teaching Ethics in Science", Studies in Science Education, 34(1), pp.115~140 (1999), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  67. Resnik, D. B., "The ethics of science : An introduction" (1998), Routledge
  68. Robins, R. W., "Handbook of research methods in personality psychology" (2009), Guilford Press
  69. Rogoff, B., "Handbook of child psychology, Vol, 2:Cognition, Perception and Language", pp.679~744 (1998), Wiley
  70. Ryu, C., "Analysis of character virtue factors for character education", The Journal of Education, 26(1), pp.139~166 (2006)
  71. Sardjijo, W., "Integrating character building into mathematics and science courses in elementary school", International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(6), pp.1547~1552 (2017)
  72. Snow, C. P., "The two cultures and the scientific revolution" (1963), Cambridge University Press
  73. Son, B., "Character education : Need, style, way", Philosophy and Reality, 27, pp.60~69 (1995)
  74. Tabachnick, B. G., "Using multivariate statistics" (2007), Allyn & Bacon
  75. T students, "Characteristic and identification of G", pp.1981, Tuttle, F. B.
  76. Sandra van Aalderen-Smeets, "Measuring Primary Teachers' Attitudes Toward Teaching Science: Development of the Dimensions of Attitude Toward Science (DAS) Instrument", International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), pp.577~600 (2013), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  77. Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in society : The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
  78. Wertsch, J. V., "Vygotsky and the social formation of mind" (1985), Harvard University Press
  79. Yates, L., "Australian curriculum 1975-2005: What has been happening to knowledge?" (2008), Paper presented at symposium:Australian Curriculum as ‘Really Useful’ Educational Research
  80. Yerrick, R., "Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research", pp.1~18 (2005), Lawremce Erlbaum Associations, Inc
  81. 유병열, "인성교육의 덕교육적 접근과 실천 원리에 관한 연구", 한국초등교육, 26(1), pp.303~322 (2015), 초등교육연구원[DOI]
  82. Dana L. Zeidler, "Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education", Science Education, 89(3), pp.357~377 (2005), Wiley[DOI]
  83. Miron Zuckerman, "The egocentric bias: Seeing oneself as cause and target of others' behavior", Journal of Personality, 51(4), pp.621~630 (1983), Wiley[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

협력적 문제해결 중심 교수모델에 기반 한 학생 인성 역량 평가 도구 개발강유진, 김희화, 남정희, 박종석, 손정우, 전란영한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2018 · 제38권 제3호초등학생들의 과학윤리성을 측정하기 위한 검사도구 개발김성덕, 김효남한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2016 · 제36권 제1호초등학생용 과학의 본성 검사 도구 개발 및 타당성 검토박재용, 박재현한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2022 · 제41권 제4호과학교육에서 인성교육의 필요성 및 인성의 구인에 대한 전문가의 인식강유진, 김지나, 김희화, 남정희, 박종석, 손정우, 전란영, 조혜숙한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2018 · 제38권 제4호‘과학 교실 탐구공동체’ 관점 기반 과학 수업 인식 조사 도구 개발 및 적용장진아, 정용재한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2017 · 제37권 제2호2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 기초한 과학과 핵심역량 조사 문항의 개발 및 적용강남화, 고성우, 김무경, 김미점, 김용진, 민재식, 박현주, 손미현, 오필석, 이윤형, 하민수, 한효정한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2018 · 제38권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

‘수업을 보는 눈’으로서 교사의 전문적 시각에 대한 기존 연구의 특징과 쟁점 분석김미정, 박지선, 윤혜경, 송영진, 정용재pp. 765-780과학, 기술, 공학, 수학(STEM) 직종에 요구되는 핵심 역량 분석장혜원pp. 781-792‘과학의 지혜’에 대한 탐색적 연구 -지혜 지향적 과학교육을 향하여-임인숙, 송진웅pp. 793-812초등학생들의 빛에 대한 이미지 스키마 분석을 통한 개념적 은유 구조 연구김영민, 정진규pp. 813-823초등학생들의 과학 글쓰기에 나타나는 과학적 추론의 학년별 차이김효남, 임옥기pp. 839-851
원문 보기