Perception of the Scientifically Gifted and Long-term Effects of Science Gifted Education Program -from the Students' Perspectives.
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to investigate the impacts of a science gifted education program. 155 students who experienced the SNU science gifted education program were interviewed. The interview questions consisted of eligible questions from ‘Interview Protocol of Hertzog’ (2003) based on ‘Recommended Practice in Gifted Education (Shore, Cornell, & Ward, 1991)’. All interviews were immediately transcribed and analyzed qualitatively. It was found that scientifically gifted students had similar concepts of the gifted to what scholars consider as the gifted. Comparing the programs to school education program, the students agreed that the science gifted education program provided more experiments opportunities, higher and deeper level of contents, and more active interactions. Regarding long-term effects, it was found that program influenced on students' decisions for the future, stimuli and expansion of horizons, school work and entrance examinations. Students gained self-confidence and became more interested in science. Some pointed out that they felt greater stimulated, although some indicated an elevated level of self conceit. Implications of science gifted education were found based on these results.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the impacts of a science gifted education program. 155 students who experienced the SNU science gifted education program were interviewed. The interview questions consisted of eligible questions from ‘Interview Protocol of Hertzog’ (2003) based on ‘Recommended Practice in Gifted Education (Shore, Cornell, & Ward, 1991)’. All interviews were immediately transcribed and analyzed qualitatively. It was found that scientifically gifted students had similar concepts of the gifted to what scholars consider as the gifted. Comparing the programs to school education program, the students agreed that the science gifted education program provided more experiments opportunities, higher and deeper level of contents, and more active interactions. Regarding long-term effects, it was found that program influenced on students' decisions for the future, stimuli and expansion of horizons, school work and entrance examinations. Students gained self-confidence and became more interested in science. Some pointed out that they felt greater stimulated, although some indicated an elevated level of self conceit. Implications of science gifted education were found based on these results.
참고문헌 (24)
- Avery, L.D., "Making evaluation work: One school district's experience", Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(4), pp.124~132 (1997)
- Bogdan, R., "Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods" (2006), Allyn & Bacon
- Borland, J.H., "Planning and implementing programs for the gifted" (1989), Teachers College Press
- Borland, J.H., "Evaluating gifted programs", pp.253~268 (1997), Allyn & Bacon
- Coleman, J., "Self-concept and the gifted classroom: The role of social comparisons", Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, pp.116~120 (1985)
- Callahan, C.M., "Determining the effectiveness of educational services: Assessment issues. In Challenges in gifted education: Developing potential and investing in knowledge for the 21st century", pp.109~114 (1992), Columbus Ohio State Department of Education
- Callahan, C.M., "Program evaluation in gifted education" (2004), Corwin Press
- Davalos, R.A., "After the dust has settled: Youth reflect on their high school mentored research experience", Roeper Review, 19, pp.204~207 (1997)
- Feldhusen, J.E., "Toward excellence in Gifted Education" (1985), Love Publishing Co.
- Fetterman, D.M., "Evaluate yourself" (1993), National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented
- Feng, A.X., "Designing and utilizing evaluation forgifted program improvement" (2003), Prufrock Press Co.
- Ford, D., "Desegregating gifted education: A need unmet", Journal of Negro Education, 64, pp.52~60 (1995)
- Greene, J., "Qualitative program evaluation: Practice and promise" (1994), Sage
- Hertzog, N.B., "Impact of gifted program from the students' perspectives", Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), pp.131~143 (2003)
- Kulik, J., "Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs", Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, pp.73~77 (1992)
- Landrum, M.S., "An evaluation of the catalyst program: Consultation and collaboration in gifted education", Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(2), pp.139~151 (2001)
- Lubinski, D., "The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY): The first three decades of a planned fifty-year longitudinal study of intellectual talent", pp.255~281 (1994), Ablex
- Renzulli, J., "Systems and models for developing programs for the giftedand talented" (1986), Creative Learning Press
- Sapon-Shevin, M., "Gifted education and the protection of privilege: Breakin the silence, opening the discourse", pp.45~73 (1993), State University of New York Press
- Shore, M.B., "Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis" (1991), Teachers College Press
- Smutny, J.F., "Designing and developing programs for gifted students", CA:Corwin Press (2002)
- Swiatek, M.A., "Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students", Journalof Educational Psychology, 3, pp.528~538 (1991)
- Tannenbaum, A., "Gifted Children" (1983), Macmillan
- Treffinger, D., "Enhancing and expanding gifted programs: The levels of service approach" (2004), Prufrock Press Co.