본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

교사들의 진화 개념 이해 향상을 위한 논변활동 프로그램 효과 분석

Analyzing the Effect of Argumentation Program for Improving Teachers' Conceptions of Evolution

차희영|권지은
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2015.08|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제35권 제4호|pp. 691-707|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0691

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

teacher education programbiology teachersbiological evolutionevolution education논변활동argumentation activity교사교육 프로그램생물진화진화교육생명과학교사
주제분류교육학

초록

이 연구는 생명과학교사들의 진화개념 향상을 위한 논변활동 프로그램을 개발하고 이를 교사교육에 적용하여 진화개념에 대한 논변활동 특성을 분석함으로써 효과를 알아보고자 하는 것이었다. 이를 위해먼저 진화를 이해하는데 필요한 주요 개념들을 문헌 조사를 통해 추출하여 ‘변이’, ‘변이의 유전’, ‘경쟁’, ‘자연선택과 적응’, ‘차등적 생식력’, ‘개체군 내 개체분포의 변화’, ‘대진화’를 주요개념으로 선정하였고, 각각의 개념에 대한 논변활동 질문지를 개발하였다. ADI모형을 변형한 7단계로 이루어진 순환적 논변활동 학습모형도 개발하였다. 총 7회에 대학원 교과교육 수업에 적용하였다. 현직 생명과학교사 4명과 예비 생명과학교사 2명을 대상으로 남, 여 3명씩 두 개의 소집단으로 구성하여 논변활동을 진행하였다. 프로그램이 진행되는 동안 녹음을 통한 담화와 논변글쓰기의 자료를 수집하여 분석하였다. 논변글쓰기는 ‘설명의 충분성’, ‘설명의 개념적 수준’, ‘증거의 수준’, ‘정당화의적절성’의 4가지 범주를 기준으로 논변의 질 수준을 분석하여 사전사후에 진화개념의 변화 정도를 확인하였고, 담화분석을 통해 진화주요개념에 대한 논변활동 특성을 분석하였다. 논변글쓰기와 담화를 분석한 결과 개발된 논변활동 모형과 프로그램은 생명과학교사들의 진화개념 이해 향상에 효과적이었다. 이 연구는 논변활동을 통한 교수학습 전략이 생명과학교사교육을 위한 효과적인 진화개념학습 전략이될 수 있음을 보여주었다.

Abstract

This study aims to develop biology teachers' education program based on argumentation activity about core concepts of evolution and to analyze the characteristics of core concepts of evolution learned during the program. The eight core concepts of evolution in this study were variation, heritability of variation, competition, natural selection, adaptation, differential reproductive rate of individuals, changes in genetic pool within a population, and macroevolution. The performances of teachers participating in the program were compared before and after argumentation activities; consisting of seven sessions on the eight core concepts of evolution. The process of the program was specially designed by learning cycle model for teacher education, consisting of seven phases: identification of the task, production of a tentative argument, small group’s written argument, share arguments with the other groups, reflective discussion, final written argument, and organization by an instructor. Participants in the study were two pre-service biology teachers and four in-service biology teachers. The results suggest that biology teachers reduced the teleological explanation for biological evolution and improve its adequacy after the intervention. Teachers lacked the opportunity to discuss variation, heritability of variation, competition, and macroevolution because science textbooks lack information on the concepts of biological evolution. The results of this study suggest that because the argumentation program developed for teachers helps to improve understanding the concepts of evolution and to reduce inadequate conceptions in biology, teacher education programs using argumentation activity and eight core concepts of evolution will play a role for efficient evolution education for biology teachers.

참고문헌 (68)

  1. AAAS(American Association for the Advancement of Science)., "Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report" (1993), Oxford University Press
  2. AAAS(American Association for the Advancement of Science), "Atlas of science literacy", pp.2001, AAAS
  3. evolution controversy, "Defending evolution: A guide to the creation", pp.2001, Alters, B. J.
  4. Alters, B. J., "Perspective : Teaching evolution in higher education", Evolution, 56(10), pp.1891~1901 (2002)
  5. Anderson, D. L., "Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), pp.952~978 (2002)
  6. Andersson, B., "On Developing content-oriented theories taking biological evolution as an example", International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), pp.673~695 (2006)
  7. Asterhan, C. S., "The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory", Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), pp.626~639 (2007)
  8. Barron, B., "Problem solving in video-based microworlds : Collaboration and individual outcomes of high achieving sixth grade students", Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), pp.391~398 (2000)
  9. Bell, P., "Scientific arguments as learning artifacts : Designing for learning from the web with KIE", International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), pp.797~817 (2000)
  10. Bennett, J., "Talking science : The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching", International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), pp.69~95 (2010)
  11. Berland, L. K., "A Learning progression for scientific argumentation : Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts", Science Education, 94(5), pp.765~793 (2010)
  12. Brumby, M. N., "The use of problem-solving in meaningful learning in biology", Research in Science Education, 11(1), pp.103~110 (1981)
  13. Bybee, R. W., "Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (Volume II)", pp.357~387 (1994), MacMillan
  14. Catley, K. M., "Darwin’s missing link—a novel paradigm for evolution education", Science Education, 90(5), pp.767~783 (2006)
  15. Chi, M. T. H., "Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution", pp.145~173 (2012), Oxford University Press
  16. Chung, W., "High school students' misconceptions on genetics and evolution", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 14(2), pp.170~183 (1994)
  17. Cohen, E. G., "Restructuring the classroom : conditions for productive small groups", Review of Educational Research, 64(1), pp.1~35 (1994)
  18. Dobzhansky, T., "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution", The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), pp.125~129 (1973)
  19. Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~313 (2000)
  20. Duschl, R. A., "Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education", Studies in Science Education, 38(1), pp.39~72 (2002)
  21. Duschl, R., "Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research", pp.159~175 (2007), Springer Academic Publishers
  22. Erduran, S., "TAPping into argumentation : Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse", Science Education, 88(6), pp.915~933 (2004)
  23. Ferrari, M., "The nature of naive explanations of natural selection", International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), pp.1231~1256 (1998)
  24. 하민수, "진화 기작에 관한 설명의 질적 횡단 연구", 생물교육, 35(1), pp.106~116 (2007), 한국생물교육학회
  25. Heddy, B. C., "Transformative experience to promote positive affect and conceptual change in students learning about biological evolution", Science Education, 97(5), pp.723~744 (2013)
  26. Hogan, K., "Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions", Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), pp.379~432 (1999)
  27. Hogan, K., "Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students’ and scientists’ reasoning about conclusions", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), pp.663~687 (2001)
  28. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., ""Doing the lesson"or"doing science" : Argument in high school genetics", Science Education, 84(6), pp.757~792 (2000)
  29. Jo, J., "Pre-service biology teachers' perspectives about biological meanings of competition and adaptation", Master, pp.2014
  30. 정주혜, "「증거 기반 설명 활동」이 고등학생들의 논변 수준과 진화 개념 변화에 미치는 영향", 생물교육, 38(1), pp.168~183 (2010), 한국생물교육학회
  31. 강남화, "논변, 논의 그리고 논증: 개념의 명료화를 위한 문헌조사 연구", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(6), pp.1119~1138 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
  32. 김희경, "학생의 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 과학탐구활동 모형의 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1216~1234 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  33. 김정래, "생물교사와 예비 생물교사의 대진화 개념에 관련된 변인들 간의 관계 분석", 생물교육, 42(4), pp.428~438 (2014), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  34. Kuhn, D., "The development of argument skills", Child Development, 74(5), pp.1245~1260 (2003)
  35. Kwon, M., "Development and application of immunity concept instruction program utilizing student generated role-playing analogy:Focused on ‘defense action' chapter in life science", pp.2013
  36. Kwon, J., "Theories in science education" (2012), Kyoyookbook Publication Co
  37. Lawson, A., "The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching", International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), pp.1387~1408 (2003)
  38. 이효녕, "학교과학교육에서의 논증활동 활용에 대한 교사들의 인식", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(6), pp.666~679 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
  39. Linn, M. C., "Handbook of educational psychology", pp.511~544 (2006), Erlbaum
  40. McNeill, K. L., "Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), pp.153~191 (2006)
  41. Min, B., "Argument structure analysis of newspaper editorials", Korean Language and Literature, 127, pp.133~154 (2000)
  42. MOEST(Ministry of Education, Science and Technology), "2009Revised Science Curriculum", Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, ~ (2011)
  43. Nadelson, L. S., "Development and preliminary evaluation of the measure of understanding of macroevolution:introducing the MUM", The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(2), pp.151~190 (2009)
  44. NRC(National Research Council), "National science education standards" (1996), National Academy Press
  45. NRC(National Research Council), "A framework for K-12 science education; Practice, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas" (2011), National Academy Press
  46. NRC(National Research Council), "Next generation science standards" (2013), National Academy Press
  47. Nehm, R. H., "Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools?", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), pp.699~723 (2007)
  48. Nelson, C. E., "Teaching evolution(and all of biology) more effectively:Strategies for engagement, critical reasoning, and confronting misconceptions", Integrative and Comparative Biology, 48(2), pp.213~225 (2008)
  49. The effect of expository text on students’explanations of biological evolution, "Ohlsson, S.", Learning Research and Development Center, ~, pp.OERI Report (1992)
  50. Opfer, J. E., "Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), pp.744~777 (2012)
  51. Osborne, J., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science classrooms", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), pp.994~1020 (2004)
  52. 박재근, "한국과 미국 과학 교과서의 진화 내용 요소와 설명 방식에 대한 비교", 생물교육, 41(3), pp.406~420 (2013), 한국생물교육학회
  53. 박종분, "자연선택개념의 이해를 위한 활동중심수업의 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(5), pp.505~516 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
  54. Park, J., "An Investigation into the relationship among cognitive presence, sef-Efficacy, participation, satisfaction, and achievement in an e-Learning environment", pp.2007
  55. Reece, J. B., "Campbell Biology" (2011), Pearson Education, Inc
  56. Sadler, T., "Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues : a critical review of the research", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), pp.513~536 (2004)
  57. Sampson, V., "The Impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation", Science Education, 93(3), pp.448~484 (2008)
  58. Sampson, V., "A Comparison of the collaborative scientific argumentation practices of two high and two low performing groups", Research in Science Education, 41(1), pp.63~97 (2009)
  59. Sampson, V., "Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments : An exploratory study", Science Education, 95(2), pp.217~257 (2010)
  60. Sandoval, W. A., "The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations", Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), pp.23~55 (2005)
  61. 신지원, "논의 및 과학 글쓰기 관련 국내 과학 교육 연구 동향 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(2), pp.107~122 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  62. Shtulman, A., "Qualitative differences between naive and scientific theories of evolution", Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), pp.170~194 (2006)
  63. Smith, M. U., "Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: Ⅱ. Pedagogical Issues", Science & Education, 19(6-8), pp.539~571 (2010)
  64. Tavares, M. L., "Articulation of conceptual knowledge and argumentation practices by high school students in evolution problems", Science & Education, 19(6-8), pp.573~598 (2010)
  65. "The Korean Standard Dictionary" (2014)[URL]
  66. Toulmin, S., "The uses of the argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
  67. Vries, E., "Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue : Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), pp.63~103 (2002)
  68. Wenglinsky, H., "How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality" (2000), National Assessment of Educational Progress. Policy Information Center

관련 논문AI추천

초등과학영재들의 자연선택 개념 형성을 위한 논변활동 효과 분석박철진, 차희영한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2016 · 제36권 제4호중학생의 진화 개념 이해 향상을 위한 단계별 글쓰기 프로그램의 효과김예은, 차희영한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2024 · 제44권 제5호생물학에서 진화론의 역할에 대한 인식 향상을 위한 교사교육 프로그램의 개발 및 적용이순남, 장경애, 차희영한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2014 · 제34권 제8호「증거 기반 설명 활동」이 고등학생들의 논변 수준과 진화 개념 변화에 미치는 영향김희백, 정주혜한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2010 · 제38권 제1호초등 과학 영재 학생들의 자연선택 개념 이해를 위한 논변 활동에서 나타난 인식적 이해와 논변활동 수준 분석박철진, 차희영한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2017 · 제37권 제4호고등학생들의 자연 선택 개념 이해를 위한 학습자 활동 중심 프로그램 적용 효과김동렬한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2008 · 제36권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)

초등과학영재와 일반학생의 과학적 의문 생성 패턴 분석이길재, 엄주경pp. 537-5482009 개정 교육과정에 의한 융합형 과학이 학생들의 과학의 본성과 STS에 대한 견해, 과학에 대한 흥미 및 포부에 미치는 영향노태희, 양찬호, 김민환pp. 549-555협력적 멘토링 과정에서 나타나는 초임중등과학교사의 교수실행 문제점권정인, 박지훈, 남정희pp. 557-564과학교과 웹 기반 탐구학습의 효과성 연구 동향박현경, 정연화, 이정민, 노지예pp. 565-572예비 과학교사의 탐구지도 경험에 관한 사례연구: 탐구의 인식과 실천 사이의 딜레마 해소를 중심으로조성민, 백종호pp. 573-584
원문 보기