본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘과학의 본성’ 교육 -그 다원성 고찰-

A Study on the Plurality of Nature of Science in Science Education

김찬종|최승언|조은진
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2018.10|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제38권 제5호|pp. 721-738|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.5.721

0

조회

0

다운로드

17

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

다원성plurality합의 과학의 본성 관점대안적 과학의 본성 관점들consensus view of nature of sciencealternative views of nature of science
주제분류교육학

초록

최근 유수 과학교육연구자들은 세계 여러 나라의 과학교육 현장은 물론, 과학교육 연구 전통에서 과학의 본성 교육의 중심축을 형성해온 ‘합의 과학의 본성 관점’에 대한 비판과 옹호 및 대안적 견해들을 갑론을박 형세로 제기하고 있다. 합의 과학의 본성 관점은 다각적인 경로를 통해 NOS 교육 표준화를 위해 구축한 ‘보편적 과학 지식의 본성’에 해당한다. 그 교의에는 과학 지식의 잠정성, 주관성, 이론 의존성, 법칙과 이론, 관찰과 추론, 상상력과 창의성, 사회문화적 착근성 주제 등이 포함되며, 몇 가지 선언적 문장으로 구성된 리스트 형식을 취하고 있다. 본 연구자는 지금까지의 서구 과학교육 연구 내 NOS 개념화 전통은 물론, 현 시점에서 논의되는 NOS 교육의 동향을 파악하는 것이 현대적이며 미래 지향적 과학적 소양인 교육을 위해 필수적이라고 판단하였다. 이에 먼저 문헌 연구를 통해, 특히 과학에 대한 전체론적 인식론을 주창해 온 저명 과학교육 연구자들이 제시한 합의 NOS 관점에 대한 논쟁과 비판의 요지를 파악하여 제시하였다. 이어 과학의 본성이 갖는 본유적 가치는 다양한 학문적 렌즈를 통해 과학이 기능하는 실제 방식을 표현하는데 있으므로, 그러한 기능을 충분히 수행하도록 이끌 수 있는 과학의 본성 개념에 다가가기 위해, 여러 대안적 과학의 본성의 내용 요소에 대한 제안 및 과학의 본성 교육에 대한 의견들을 살펴 보았다. 즉 ‘과학의 본성 개념이 갖는 논쟁적 요소에 대한 교수’, ‘비판적 과학의 본성’, ‘비판적 사고력 과학의 본성’, ‘전체 과학’, ‘과학의 특성’, ‘재개념화 된 가족유사성 접근 과학의 본성’ 등을 고찰하여, 현대적 과학철학과 과학지식사회학에 기반을 두어 과학의 본성 내용 지식의 보편성과 다원성을 중심으로 그 함의를 제시하였다.

Abstract

Nature of Science(NOS) has been a well-organized focus of science education and one of the key elements in defining and cultivating scientific literacy for more than a century. In recent years, a specific description of NOS, which is often known as ‘the consensus view of NOS’, has become very influential and has gained ready acceptance as an arrangement for both curriculum building and research into understanding of NOS by students and teachers in many countries around the world. This study has two purposes; one is to review some debates and criticism on the consensus view of NOS which consists of a list of sentences to describe nature of refined and general science, which have been heated up for the last few years by many prominent science education researchers, and the other is to consider alternative perspectives on NOS for the purpose of a new direction of NOS education. As a result of an investigation into such views as ‘Teaching about NOS’, ‘Critical NOS’, ‘Critical Thinking-NOS’, ‘Whole Science’, ‘Features of Science’ and ‘Reconceptualized Family Resemblance Approach to NOS’, some implications which focus on the generality and plurality of content knowledge of NOS based on current philosophy of science and sociology of scientific knowledge are suggested for the improvement of teaching and learning NOS.

참고문헌 (142)

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Embedding Nature of Science Instruction in Preservice Elementary Science Courses : Abandoning Scientism, But", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), pp.215~233 (2001)
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains", Science & Education, 22(9), pp.2087~2107 (2012)
  3. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Examining the sources for our understandings about science : enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education", International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), pp.353~374 (2012)
  4. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Springer international handbooks of education: vol. 24. Second international handbook of science education", pp.1041~1060 (2012), Springer Science+Business Media B. V
  5. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "The nature of science and instructional practice : Making the unnatural natural", Science Education, 82(4), pp.417~436 (1998)
  6. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Improving science teachers’conceptions of the nature of science : A critical review of the literature", International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), pp.665~701 (2000)
  7. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), pp.1057~1095 (2000)
  8. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), pp.835~855 (2008)
  9. Acevedo-Díaz, J. A., "«Algo antiguo, algo nuevo, algo prestado». Tendencias sobre la naturaleza de la ciencia en la educación científica", Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 13(1), pp.3~19 (2016)
  10. Ackerson, V., "Relationships among learner characteristics and preservice teachers’ views of the nature of science", Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(1), pp.45~58 (2008)
  11. Aikenhead, G. S., "The development of a new instrument : ‘Views on Science-Technology-Society’(VOSTS)", Science Education, 76(5), pp.477~491 (1992)
  12. Allchin, D., "Rekindling phlogiston : From classroom case study to interdisciplinary relationships", Science & Education, 6(5), pp.473~509 (1997)
  13. Allchin, D., "Evaluating knowledge of the nature of(whole)science", Science Education, 95(3), pp.518~542 (2011)
  14. Allchin, D., "Teaching the nature of science. Perspectives and resources" (2013), SHiPS Education Press
  15. Allchin, D., "Beyond the consensus view: Whole science", Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(1), pp.18~26 (2017)
  16. Alters, B. J., "Whose nature of science?", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), pp.39~55 (1997)
  17. American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS), "Science for all Americans" (1990), Oxford University Press
  18. American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS), "Benchmarks for scientific literacy" (1993), Oxford University Press
  19. Bazzul, J., "From Orthodoxy to Plurality in the Nature of Science (NOS) and Science Education: A Metacommentary", Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(1), pp.66~71 (2017)
  20. Bybee, R. W., "Achieving scientific literacy : From purposes to practices" (1997), Heinemann Publishing
  21. Bybee, R. W., "Scientific and engineering practices in K-12classrooms", Science Teacher, 78(9), pp.34~40 (2011)
  22. Carter, L., "Globalization and science education : The implications of science in the new economy", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), pp.617~633 (2008)
  23. Chang, Y., "Trends of science education research : an automatic content analysis", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, pp.315~332 (2010)
  24. 정용욱, "법칙, 이론, 그리고 원리: 규범적 의미와 실제사용에서의 혼란", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(5), pp.459~468 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  25. Clough, M. P., "Teaching the Nature of Science to Secondary and Post-Secondary Students : Questions Rather Than Tenets, The Pantaneto Forum, Issue 25, January", Republished(2008)in the California Journal of Science Education, 8(2), pp.31~40 (2007)
  26. Clough, M. P., "Teaching and assessing the nature of science", The Science Teacher, 78(6), pp.56~60 (2011)
  27. Dagher, Z. R., "International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching", pp.1203~1233 (2014), Springer
  28. Dagher, Z. R., "Reconceptualizing the nature of science:Why does it matter?", Science & Education, 25(1 & 2), pp.147~164 (2016)
  29. Dagher, Z. R., "Abandoning patchwork approaches to nature of science in science education", Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 17(1), pp.46~52 (2017)
  30. DeBoer, G. E., "Scientific literacy : Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), pp.582~601 (2000)
  31. Deng, F., "Students’ views of the nature of science : A critical review of research", Science Education, 95(6), pp.961~999 (2011)
  32. Driver, R., "Young People’s Images of Science" (1996), Open University Press
  33. Duschl, R. A., "Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (Volume II)", pp.443~465 (1994), MacMillan
  34. Duschl, R. A., "Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Controversy", pp.3~19 (2011), Routledge
  35. Duschl, R. A., "Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science", Science & Education, 22, pp.2109~2139 (2013)
  36. Eflin, J. T., "The Nature of Science: A Perspective from the Philosophy of Science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), pp.107~117 (1999)
  37. Elby, A., "On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology", Science Education, 85(5), pp.554~567 (2001)
  38. Ennis, R. H., "Logic in teaching" (1969), Prentice-Hall
  39. Erduran, S., "Beyond Nature of Science : The Case for Reconceptualising"Science"for Science Education", Science Education International, 25(1), pp.93~111 (2014)
  40. Erduran, S., "Visualising the nature of science: beyond textual pieces to holistic images in science education", Cognitive and affective aspects in science education research: selected papers from the ESERA 2015 conference (2016), Springer
  41. Erduran, S., "Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories" (2014), Springer
  42. Erduran, S., "Regaining focus in Irish junior cycle science : Potential new directions for curriculum development on nature of science", Irish Educational Studies, 33(4), pp.335~350 (2014)
  43. Erduran, S., "Argumentation in science education : Recent developments and future directions" (2007), Springer
  44. Erduran, S., "Science Education Research and Practice in Asia-Pacific and Beyond", pp.3~24 (2018), Springer
  45. Feyerabend, P., "Knowledge without foundations" (1962), Oberlin College
  46. Finson, K. D., "Drawing a scientist : What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings", School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), pp.335~345 (2002)
  47. Giere, R. N., "Constructive realism", pp.75~98 (1985), Images of Science
  48. Good, R., "Nature-of-science literacy in Benchmarks and Standards: Postmodern", relativist or modern, Science &Education, pp.2001, 10[DOI]
  49. Consensus: Expanding the scientific method and school science, "Grandy, R. E.", Teaching Scientific Inquiry:Recommendations for Research and Implementation, 304~325 (2008)
  50. Harding, P., "Portraying science accurately in classrooms : Emphasizing open‐mindedness rather than relativism", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), pp.225~236 (2000)
  51. Hodson, D., "History, philosophy and science teaching", pp.1991, OISE Press
  52. Hodson, D., "Teaching and learning science : Towards a personalized approach" (1998), McGraw-Hill Education
  53. Hodson, D., "Time for action : Science education for an alternative future", International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), pp.645~670 (2003)
  54. Hodson, D., "Towards scientific literacy : A teachers’ guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science" (2008), Sense Publishers
  55. Hodson, D., "Teaching and learning about science : Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values" (2009), Sense Publishers
  56. Hodson, D., "International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching", pp.911~970 (2014), Springer
  57. Hodson, D., "Going beyond the consensus view:Broadening and enriching the scope of NOS-oriented curricula", Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(1), pp.3~17 (2017)
  58. Hogan, K., "Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students’ and scientists’ reasoning about conclusions", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), pp.663~687 (2001)
  59. Irez, S., "Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks", Science Education, 93(3), pp.422~447 (2009)
  60. Irzik, G., "A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education", Science & Education, 20, pp.591~607 (2011)
  61. Irzik, G., "A family resemblance approach. Plenary presentation session with N. Lederman titled: Current philosophical and educational issues in nature of science (NOS) research, and possible future directions", Presented at the International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching (IHPST) Conference (2011)
  62. Irzik, G., "International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching", pp.999~1021 (2014), Springer
  63. Kampa, N., "German national proficiency scales in biology : Internal structure, relations to general cognitive abilities and verbal skills", Science Education, 100(5), pp.903~922 (2016)
  64. Kampourakis, K., "The"general aspects"conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), pp.667~682 (2016)
  65. Karisan, D., "Contextualization of nature of science within the socioscientific issues framework: A review of research", International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), pp.139~152 (2017)
  66. Kaya, E., "From FRA to RFN, or how the Family Resemblance Approach can be transformed for science curriculum analysis on nature of science", Science & Education, 25(9-10), pp.1115~1133 (2016)
  67. Kaya, E., "Nature of Science in Teacher Education: A Holistic Approach", Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 11(2) (2017)
  68. Khishfe, R., "Nature of science and decision-making", International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), pp.67~100 (2012)
  69. Kim, M., "Educational Effects of the Integrated Science Developed Under the 2009 Revised National Curriculum: Focused on Student’s Views on Nature of Science and Science-Technology-Society Relationship, Interest in Science, and Science Aspiration", Master’s, pp.2016
  70. Kim, H., "Sociological understanding of science and technology", Science, Philosophy & Culture, 20, pp.223~238 (1997)
  71. Kötter, M., "Controversy as a Blind Spot in Teaching Nature of Science", Science & Education, 26(5), pp.451~482 (2017)
  72. Kwak Y., "Theoretical background of constructivist epistemology", Journal of Korean Earth Sience Society, 22(5), pp.427~447 (2001)
  73. Lakatos, I., "Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes", Criticism and the growth of knowledge, 4, pp.91~196 (1970)
  74. Laudan, L., "Scientific change : Philosophical models and historical research", Synthese, 69(2), pp.141~223 (1986)
  75. Lederman, N. G., "Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science : A review of the research", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp.331~359 (1992)
  76. Lederman, N. G., "Scientific inquiry and nature of science", pp.301~317 (2006), Springer
  77. Lederman, N. G., "Handbook of research on science education", pp.831~879 (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum
  78. Lederman, N. G., "Views of nature of science questionnaire(VNOS) : Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners conceptions of nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), pp.497~521 (2002)
  79. Lederman, N. G., "Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics : A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry", Science & Education, 23(2), pp.285~302 (2014)
  80. Lederman, N. G., "Handbook of research on science education (Volume Ⅱ)", pp.1739~1815 (2014), Lawrence Erlbaum
  81. Lederman, J. S., "Meaningful assessment of learners’understandings about scientific inquiry—The views about scientific inquiry(VASI)questionnaire", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), pp.65~83 (2014)
  82. 이정원, "교육과정 개정에 따른 과학의 본성 수준 및 반영정도 탐색: 7차 및 2009 개정교육과정사례 분석", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 9(2), pp.217~232 (2016), 대한지구과학교육학회[DOI]
  83. 이수정, "미래 지향적인 실과(기술·가정) 교육과정 탐색", 한국실과교육학회지, 21(3), pp.21~39 (2008), 한국실과교육학회
  84. Martins, A. F. P., "Natureza da Ciência no ensino de ciências : uma proposta baseada em"temas"e"questões"", Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 32(3), pp.703~737 (2015)
  85. Matthews, M. R., "Science teaching : The role of history and philosophy of science" (1994), Psychology Press
  86. Matthews, M. R., "Editorial", Science & Education, 6(4), pp.323~329 (1997)
  87. Matthews, M. R., "How pendulum studies can promote knowledge of the nature of science", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), pp.359~368 (2001)
  88. Matthews, M. R., "Advances in nature of science research. Concepts and methodologies", pp.3~26 (2012), Springer
  89. Matthews, M. R., "Handbook of research on history, philosophy and sociology of science" (2014), Springer
  90. McCain, K., "The nature of scientific knowledge : An explanatory approach" (2016), Springer
  91. McComas, W. F., "Ten myths of science : Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science", School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), pp.10~16 (1996)
  92. McComas, W. F., "Teaching the nature of science: What illustrations and examples exist in popular books on the subject", Eighth International History, Philosophy & Science Teaching (IHPST)Conference (2005)
  93. McComas, W. F., "Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science", Science & Education, 17(2-3), pp.249~263 (2008)
  94. McComas, W. F., "The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies", pp.53~70 (1998), Kluwer
  95. Meichtry, Y. J., "The impact of science curricula on student views about the nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), pp.429~443 (1993)
  96. Merton, R. K., "The sociology of science : Theoretical and empirical investigations" (1973), University of Chicago press
  97. Millar, R., "Twenty first century science : Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science", International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), pp.1499~1521 (2006)
  98. Ministry of Education(MOE)., "2015 revised national curriculum of science" (2015), Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
  99. Mirowski, P., "Handbook of Science and Technology Studies", pp.635~689 (2008), MIT Press
  100. Moss, P. A., "Learning from our differences : A dialogue across perspectives on quality in education research", Educational Researcher, 38(7), pp.501~517 (2009)
  101. Musgrave, A., "Philosophy of science: The central issues", pp.1088~1113 (1998), Norton
  102. National Research Council(NRC), "National science education standards" (1996), National Academy Press
  103. National Research Council(NRC), "A framework for K-12 science education" (2012), National Academy Press
  104. Science-Technology-Society : Science Education for the 1980s(An NSTA position statement), "National Science Teachers Association(NSTA)", National Science Teachers Association(NSTA), ~ (1982)
  105. Neumann, K., "From PISA to educational standards : The impact of large-scale assessments on science education in Germany", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, pp.545~563 (2010)
  106. NGSS Lead States., "Next Generation Science Standards : For States, By States" (2013), The National Academies Press
  107. 노태희, "과학의 본성에 대한 초등학생들의 견해", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(5), pp.882~891 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
  108. Norris, S. P., "The Cambridge handbook of literacy", pp.271~285 (2009)
  109. NW., "Kernlehrplan für die Sekundarstufe II, Gymnasium, Gesamtschule in Nordrhein-Westfalen" (2014), Philosophie
  110. Oliveira, A. W., "The implicit communication of nature of science and epistemology during inquiry discussion", Science Education, 96(4), pp.652~684 (2012)
  111. Osborne, J. F., "Science Education for the Twenty First Century", Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3) (2007)
  112. Osborne, J. F., "Teaching scientific practices : Meeting the challenge of change", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), pp.177~196 (2014)
  113. Osborne, J. F., "Going beyond the consensus view: A response", Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(1), pp.53~57 (2017)
  114. Osborne, J. F., "What"ideas-about science"should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), pp.692~720 (2003)
  115. Polanyi, M., "Science bought and sold: Essays in the economics of science", pp.465~485 (1969), University of Chicago Press
  116. Pomeroy, D., "Implications of teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science : Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers", Science Education, 77(3), pp.261~278 (1993)
  117. Resnik, D. B., "The price of truth : How money affects the norms of science" (2007), Oxford University Press
  118. Roberts, D. A., "Handbook of research on science education (Volume Ⅰ)", pp.729~780 (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  119. Roberts, D. A., "Handbook of research on science education" (2014), Routledge
  120. Rudge, D. W., "Whither the VNOS?", Aprendendo ciência, 225 (2013)
  121. Rudolph, J. L., "Reconsidering the ‘nature of science’ as a curriculum component", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(3), pp.403~419 (2000)
  122. Ryder, J., "Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy", Studies in Science Education, 36, pp.1~42 (2001)
  123. Ryder, J., "International handbook of research and development in technology education", pp.287~296 (2009), Sense Publishers
  124. Ryder, J., "Undergraduate Science Students’Images of Science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), pp.201~220 (1999)
  125. Sadler, T. D., "Situated learning in science education : socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice", Studies in Science Education, 45(1), pp.1~42 (2009)
  126. Salomon, J., "Science as a commodity", pp.78~98 (1985), Longman
  127. Settlage, J., "Inquiry Science, Sheltered Instruction, and English Language Learners : Conflicting Pedagogies in Highly Diverse Classrooms", Issues in Teacher Education, 14(1), pp.39~57 (2005)
  128. SL, "Lehrplan" (2008), Philosophie
  129. Smith, M. U., "Defining versus describing the nature of science : A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators", Science Education, 83(4), pp.493~509 (1999)
  130. Stanley, W. B., "Teaching sciences : The multicultural question revisited", Science Education, 85(1), pp.35~49 (2001)
  131. Swinbank, E., "Perspectives on Science. The History, Philosophy and Ethics of Science. Teachers’ Resource File" (2007), Heinemann
  132. van Dijk, T. A., "Discourse Studies : A Multidisciplinary Introduction(Vol. Ⅰ)" (2011), Sage Publishing
  133. van Fraassen, B. C., "Philosophy of science: The central issues", pp.1064~1087 (1998), Norton
  134. Wheeler-Toppen, J. L., "Teaching NOS Tenets: Is it time for a change?", Paper presented at the Association of Science Teacher Educators(ASTE) 2005 Conference (2005)
  135. Wittgenstein, L., "Philosophical investigations" (2009), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  136. Wong, S. L., "More from the horse’s mouth : What scientists say about science as a social practice", International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), pp.1431~1463 (2010)
  137. Yacoubian, H. A., "Towards a philosophically and a pedagogically reasonable nature of science curriculum", University of Alberta, ~ (2012)
  138. Yacoubian, H. A., "A framework for guiding future citizens to think critically about nature of science and socioscientific issues", Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), pp.248~260 (2015)
  139. 양찬호, "2009 개정 교육과정에 의한 융합형 과학이 학생들의 과학의 본성과 STS에 대한 견해, 과학에 대한 흥미 및 포부에 미치는 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(4), pp.549~555 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  140. Yang, S., "Representations of Nature of Science in New Korean Science Textbooks: The Case of ‘Science Laboratory Experiment’", Master’s, pp.2019
  141. Zammito, J. H., "A nice derangement of epistemes : Post-positivism in the study of science from Quine to Latour" (2004), University of Chicago Press
  142. Ziman, J., "Are debatable scientific questions debatable?", Social Epistemology, 14(2-3), pp.187~199 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

과학의 본성 관련 국내 과학교육 연구 동향 분석이나현, 정영란, 황신영교과교육연구소 · 교과교육학연구2021 · 제25권 제3호과학교사의 과학의 본성(NOS) 수업에서 나타나는 특징 분석 -2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 ‘과학탐구실험’의 맥락에서-김민환, 노태희, 신해민대한화학회 · 대한화학회지2022 · 제66권 제5호과학교육에서 논의의 본성 탐색남정희, 정도준대한화학회 · 대한화학회지2022 · 제66권 제1호비판적 실재론에 기반한 과학의 본성 교육 가능성 탐색 및 생명과학 교육에의 함의배경석한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2024 · 제52권 제3호Discussions for linking the Nature of Science (NOS) with Scientific Inquiry박종원한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2008 · 제28권 제7호과학교사의 과학의 본성 수업에 대한 교과교육학 지식(NOS-PCK) 탐색 -과학탐구실험을 중심으로-김민환, 노태희, 신해민한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2020 · 제40권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

생물학자의 탐구에 기반한 메커니즘 추론 모델 개발정선희, 양일호pp. 599-610중등 예비 화학교사의 해결자⋅청취자 활동을 통한 지필평가 문항 제작 과정에서 언어적 행동 및 상호작용강훈식pp. 611-623우리나라 중학생들의 TIMSS 2015 화학 영역 성취 특성 분석곽영순pp. 625-633과학적 사고의 걸림돌 동기기반추론 -과학기술 분야 학문후속세대들의 사례를 중심으로-하민수, 신세인, 이준기pp. 635-647메이커 역량 모델 개발 및초·중등 교육 현장에서의 메이커 교육 방안 탐색강성주, 김경, 윤지현pp. 649-665
원문 보기