본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

안보사건에서 스테가노그라피 분석 및 형사법적 대응방안

Analysis of Steganography and Countermeasures for Criminal Laws in National Security Offenses

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류컴퓨터학

초록

스테가노그라피는 테러, 간첩 등 국가안보를 위협하는 범죄에 비밀통신 수단으로 활용되고 있다. 정보통신기술 발전에 따라 기술도 고도화되고 있고, 범죄자들은 자체적으로 프로그램을 제작하여 사용하고 있다. 하지만 스테가노그파리 관련내용이 공개되지 않아 수사기술 개발과 형사법적 대응에 한계가 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 스테가노그라피 수사를 위하여 탐지와 해독과정을 살펴보고 대법원에서 유죄판결 받은 김목사 간첩사건을 중심으로 수법을 분석하였다. 김목사 간첩사건은 사전에 약속된 스테고 키를 활용한 대칭 스테가노그라피를 사용하였고 다중 보안장치를 사용한 고도화된 수법을 사용하고 있었다. 형사법적 쟁점은 ① 관련성, ② 참여권, ③ 공개재판 등 3가지 문제에 대하여 검토하였다. 본 연구가 수사기관이 스테가노그라피에 대한 분석기법을 발전시키는데 출발점이 되기를 기대한다.

Abstract

Steganography is being used as a means of secret communication for crimes that threaten national security such as terrorism and espionage. With the development of computers, steganography technologies develop and criminals produce and use their own programs. However, the research for steganography is not active because detailed information on national security cases is not disclosed. The development of investigation technologies and the responses of criminal law are insufficient. Therefore, in this paper, the detection and decoding process was examined for steganography investigation, and the method was analyzed for ‘the spy case of Pastor Kim’, who was convicted by the Supreme Court. Multiple security devices were prepared using symmetric steganography using the pre-promised stego key. Furthermore, the three criminal legal issues: (1) the relevance issue, (2) the right to participate, and (3) the public trial issue a countermeasure were considered in national security cases. Through this paper, we hope that the investigative agency will develop analysis techniques for steganography.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. "FBI: Russian spies hid codes in online photos"[URL]
  2. Jo Jae-Ho, "Anti-forensics" (2018), episteme
  3. "Use of Children's Porno Site as a Contact Channel for Islamic Terrorists"[URL]
  4. "The Truth Behind the Shady R AT" (2011)[URL]
  5. McAfee Lab Threat Report, "Mcfree", ~ (2017)
  6. Eric Cole, "Network Security Bible", ~ (2004)
  7. "Supreme Court, “Decision 2013도2511”, Decided July 26, 2013", ~ (2013)
  8. "Supreme Court, “Decision 2014도10978”Decided Jan. 22, 2015", ~ (2015)
  9. "Supreme Court, “Decision 2017도9747”Decided Nov. 29, 2017", ~ (2017)
  10. "Supreme Court, “Decision 2017도12643”Decided Oct. 31, 2017", ~ (2017)
  11. Merrill Warkentin, "Steganography: Forensic, Security, and Legal Issues", Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 3(2), pp.17~ (2008)
  12. G. C. Kessler, "An Overview of Steganography for the Computer Forensics Examiner", Forensic Science Communications, 6(3), pp.1~29 (2004)
  13. Huayong Ge, "Steganography and Steganalysis based on digitalimage", Image and Signal Processing (CISP), pp.252~255 (2011)
  14. M. M. Sadek, "Video steganography : a comprehensive review", Multimedia Tools and Applications, 74(17), pp.7063~7094 (2015)
  15. N.F. Johnson, "Exploring steganography: Seeing the unseen", IEEE computer, 31(2), pp.26~34 (1998)
  16. Mohsen Bazyar, "A Recent Review of MP3 Based Steganography Methods", International Journal of Security and Its Applications, 8(6), pp.405~414 (2014)
  17. Jennifer Newman, "Can stego images from a mobile phone stego app be detected?", International Forensic Science Error Management Symposium (2017)
  18. Jessica Fridrich, "Reliable detection of LSB steganography in color and grayscale images", Proceedings of the 2001workshop on Multimedia and security: new challenges (MM&Sec '01), pp.27~23 (2001), Association for Computing Machinery
  19. M. Kharazi, "Image steganography:Concepts and practice", WSPC, 2004, pp.1~4
  20. S.C. Katzenbeisser, "Information Hiding Techniques for Steganography and Digital Watermarking Illustrated Edition, Information Hiding Techniques for Steganography and Digital Watermarking", pp.43~78 (2000), Artech House
  21. 김현재, "딥러닝을 이용한 범용적 스테그아날리시스", 정보과학회 컴퓨팅의 실제 논문지, 23(4), pp.244~249 (2017), 한국정보과학회[DOI]
  22. 지선수, "EWM 통계량을 이용한 스테가노그래픽 자료 감지 기법", 한국산업정보학회논문지, 13(3), pp.54~62 (2008), 한국산업정보학회
  23. M.H. Menori, "Blind steganalysis for digital images using support vector machine method", International Symposium on Electronics and Smart Devices (ISESD), pp.132~136 (2016)
  24. G.J. Babu, "Contemporary stegnalysis schemes for reliable detection of steganography", International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), pp.2013~2016 (2017)
  25. Oh So-Jung, "Steganography Analysis and Criminal Legal Issues at investigation", Winter Conference of the Korean Digital Forensics Society (2021)
  26. 김재영, "SPAM 기반 영상 스테그아날리시스의 범용성에 대한 실험적 검증", 방송공학회 논문지, 23(4), pp.526~535 (2018), 한국방송∙미디어공학회[DOI]
  27. J. Fridrich, "Rich Models for Steganalysis of Digital Images", IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 7(3), pp.868~882 (2012)
  28. "Seoul Central District Court, “Decision 2016고합538, 558(Merged)”, Decided Dec. 15, 2016", ~ (2016)
  29. "Seoul High Court, “Decision 2017노23”Decided June 13, 2017", ~ (2017)
  30. 이창현, "2017년 형사소송법 중요 판례", 인권과 정의, (473), pp.31~57 (2018), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
  31. Kim Gi-Bum, "A Study on the Improvement of Digital Forensics Capacity for Steganography", KOREA ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMEDIA LAW, research presentation (2019)
  32. "Seoul Central District Court, “Decision 2011고합1131, 1143, 1144, 1145, 1146(Each Merged)” Decided Feb. 23, 2012", ~ (2012)
  33. 이완규, "디지털 증거 압수수색과 관련성 개념의 해석", 법조, 62(11), pp.91~162 (2013), 법조협회[DOI]
  34. "Supreme Court, “Decision 2019도14341”, Decided Feb. 13, 2020", ~ (2020)
  35. 장응혁, "압수에 있어서 ‘관련성’ 판단기준의 비판적 검토 - 대법원 2019. 10. 17. 선고 2019도6775 판결을 소재로", 형사법연구, 32(2), pp.235~260 (2020), 한국형사법학회
  36. 이진국, "전자정보의 압수 ․ 수색에서 피압수 ․ 수색 당사자의 참여권에 관한 일고", 아주법학, 11(4), pp.323~340 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
  37. "Suwon District Court, “Decision 2013고합620,624(Merged),699(Merged),851(Merged)” Decided Feb. 17, 2014", ~ (2014)
  38. "Supreme Court, “Decision 2009모1190”Decided May 26, 2011", ~ (2011)
  39. "Seoul High Court, “Decision 2014노762”Decided Oct 11, 2014", ~ (2014)
  40. "Supreme Court(En banc), “Decision 2007도3061”, Decided Nov. 15, 2007", ~ (2007)
  41. "Seoul High Court, “Decision 2012노805”Decided Feb. 8, 2013", ~ (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)