본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

치과의사 자율규제 논의를 위한 해외 치과의사관리기구 검토

Review of overseas dental regulatory authorities for a discussion on self-regulation of the dentist

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the regulation of medical & dental profession in South Korea due to various medical scandals & exacerbated commercialism. Consequently, the voice asking for strengthening the license management of medical & dental profession is rising. However, there is an absolutely lacking discussion on self-regulation of the Korean dentist community. This study investigated International Society of Dental Regulators and dental regulatory authorities in the U.K., Ontario in Canada, California in the U.S. and Australia. In addition, this study examined what situations Japan was in, which was similar to Korea in terms of systems. In the U.K., the U.S., Canada and Australia, there are independent dental regulatory authorities, which place emphasis on lay personnel participation. In addition, the organizations prepared very specific and detailed ethics, standards, and punishment guidelines to be followed by professionals. And, various efforts are being made to secure transparency and trust. As a result of this study, self-regulation in Korea seems to require an open approach that embraces civil society, and it is considered that dentist should lead social discussion more positively.

Abstract

Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the regulation of medical & dental profession in South Korea due to various medical scandals & exacerbated commercialism. Consequently, the voice asking for strengthening the license management of medical & dental profession is rising. However, there is an absolutely lacking discussion on self-regulation of the Korean dentist community. This study investigated International Society of Dental Regulators and dental regulatory authorities in the U.K., Ontario in Canada, California in the U.S. and Australia. In addition, this study examined what situations Japan was in, which was similar to Korea in terms of systems. In the U.K., the U.S., Canada and Australia, there are independent dental regulatory authorities, which place emphasis on lay personnel participation. In addition, the organizations prepared very specific and detailed ethics, standards, and punishment guidelines to be followed by professionals. And, various efforts are being made to secure transparency and trust. As a result of this study, self-regulation in Korea seems to require an open approach that embraces civil society, and it is considered that dentist should lead social discussion more positively.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. "국제의료인관리기구협회 공식 홈페이지"[URL]
  2. "국제치과의료인관리협의회 공식 홈페이지"[URL]
  3. "교정치과 진료사기 논란, 부작용 이슈까지.‘.. 국민적 신뢰회복’어떻게", 치위협보, ~ (2018)
  4. "치협, ‘전문가평가제’시범사업 시행", 덴탈아리랑, ~ (2018)
  5. "영국 사례로 본‘자율규제’이상과 현실", 건치신문, ~ (2017)
  6. 치과의료인 자율규제 및 관리기구 설립에관한 연구, "홍순호", 대한치과의사협의회 치과의료정책연구소, ~ (2017)
  7. Annual report and account, "General Dental Council", ~ (2016)
  8. "General Dental Council Homepage"[URL]
  9. "2001 No. 3926. DENTIST. The Dentist Act 1984(Amendment) Order 2001", ~ (2001)
  10. Continuing Professional Development for dental professionals, "General Dental Council", ~ (2013)
  11. Annual report and account, "General Dental Council", ~ (2015)
  12. The Good medical practice framework for appraisal and revalidation, "General Medical Council", ~ (2013)
  13. General Medical Council, "Revalidation: a statement of intent", ~ (2010)
  14. Annual report, "Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario", ~ (2015)
  15. Professional standards authority, "A review conducted for the Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario", Professioanl Standards Authority for Health and Social Care, ~ (2013)
  16. Cantelon, L, "A Study of Ethics in the Profession of Dentistry", pp.2014
  17. Cook R, "Dental Dangers: How the Dental Board of California investigates dentists", Center for Health Journalism, ~ (2014)
  18. Annual report summary, "Dental Board of Australia", ~ (2017)
  19. 2017, "2018 Annual report", Australian Health Practitionaer Regulation Agency, 2017
  20. "Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 - reprinted as in forced on 1 July 2010", ~ (2010)
  21. 医道審議會道分科會, "医師及び齒科?師に医する行政處分の考え方について", 厚生勞働省, ~ (2015)
  22. 樋口範雄, "厚生勞働医 道審議會の組織と機能", 日本師會, ~ (2012)
  23. Shaw K, "Shared medical regulation in a time of increasing calls for accountability and transparency : comparison of recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom", JAMA, 302(18), pp.2008~2014 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)