치과 의료광고 규제에 관한 소고 - 대법원 판결과 헌법재판소 결정을 중심으로 -
A Study on the Regulation of Dental Medical Advertisements - Focusing on the Decisions of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court -
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
this reason, medical practice possesses characteristics of non-profit and public and such special characteristics caused heavy regulations in the medical industry as exemplified by medical advertisements. For advancement of market economy, the government has been moving toward relaxing regulations in the medical industry and this trend can be shown in medical advertisements. Moreover, as a type of commercial advertisements, medical practitioners should be able to express their freedom of expression and freedom to occupation. From the perspective of patients who are medical consumers, they need access to information to locate appropriate medical practitioners and institutions for their symptoms. Therefore, medical advertisements can help realize the patients’ right to know. This study will first analyze the general theories behind the necessity of medical advertisements and details of regulations, then analyze the issues from the cases of the supreme court and the constitutional court that are related to dental medical advertisements.
Abstract
this reason, medical practice possesses characteristics of non-profit and public and such special characteristics caused heavy regulations in the medical industry as exemplified by medical advertisements. For advancement of market economy, the government has been moving toward relaxing regulations in the medical industry and this trend can be shown in medical advertisements. Moreover, as a type of commercial advertisements, medical practitioners should be able to express their freedom of expression and freedom to occupation. From the perspective of patients who are medical consumers, they need access to information to locate appropriate medical practitioners and institutions for their symptoms. Therefore, medical advertisements can help realize the patients’ right to know. This study will first analyze the general theories behind the necessity of medical advertisements and details of regulations, then analyze the issues from the cases of the supreme court and the constitutional court that are related to dental medical advertisements.
참고문헌 (10)
- 김지석, "의사의 설명의무의 범위에 관한 고찰", 재산법연구, 28(1), pp.341~361 (2011), 한국재산법학회
- 성낙인, "헌법학 제11판(개정판)" (2011), 법문사
- 백경희, "의료분쟁 조정·소송 총론" (2011), 육법사
- 이시훈, "광고의 개념 재정립과 이론화 - 상호작용 광고의 영향을 중심으로", 커뮤니케이션 이론, 3(2), pp.153~188 (2007), 한국언론학회
- 이호용, "의료광고의 규제완화가능성에 대한 법적 검토", 인권과 정의, 317, pp.3~ (2003), 대한변호사협회
- 장욱, "의료광고 법제 변화와 개선 방향", 법학연구, 19(1), pp.279~308 (2009), 법학연구원
- 정규원, "의료광고에 대한 법적 규율", 법학논총, 31(3), pp.1~23 (2014), 법학연구소
- 최행식, "醫師의 說明義務와 患者의 自己決定權", 법학연구, (17), pp.341~363 (2004), 한국법학회
- 황성기, "인터넷 환경에서의 의료광고 규제제도 개선방안에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 48, pp.23~64 (2016), 부설법학연구소
- 홍승희, "의료광고 네거티브제 도입에 따른 문제동향", 형사정책연구소식, (100) (2007)