본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The effects of political ideology and brand familiarity on conspicuous consumption of fashion products

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

From the lens of conspicuous consumption, this research examines the interactive effect of brand logo size and political ideology on consumers’ intentions toward fashion products. Specifically, in a series of four studies, we address how consumer political ideology influences intentions toward items displaying smaller, inconspicuous logos versus larger, conspicuous logos for unfamiliar and familiar brands. We show that liberal consumers are more likely to prefer a large (rather than small) logo when a brand is unfamiliar. We suggest that liberals’ greater desire for product uniqueness elevates their risk propensity, which in turn increases preference for conspicuous consumption when familiarity with a brand is low. We show that this effect occurs only for unfamiliar brands; when brand familiarity is high (i.e. a popular or well-known brand), consumer political ideology reverses consumer preference for conspicuous consumption, replicating prior work. Our results suggest that, by manipulating their logo size, new brands may effectively target consumers based on their political ideology.

Abstract

From the lens of conspicuous consumption, this research examines the interactive effect of brand logo size and political ideology on consumers’ intentions toward fashion products. Specifically, in a series of four studies, we address how consumer political ideology influences intentions toward items displaying smaller, inconspicuous logos versus larger, conspicuous logos for unfamiliar and familiar brands. We show that liberal consumers are more likely to prefer a large (rather than small) logo when a brand is unfamiliar. We suggest that liberals’ greater desire for product uniqueness elevates their risk propensity, which in turn increases preference for conspicuous consumption when familiarity with a brand is low. We show that this effect occurs only for unfamiliar brands; when brand familiarity is high (i.e. a popular or well-known brand), consumer political ideology reverses consumer preference for conspicuous consumption, replicating prior work. Our results suggest that, by manipulating their logo size, new brands may effectively target consumers based on their political ideology.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Joseph W. Alba, "Dimensions of Consumer Expertise", Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), pp.411~ (1987), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  2. Jonah Berger, "Subtle Signals of Inconspicuous Consumption", Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), pp.555~569 (2010), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  3. Patricia E. Boverie, "Multimethodological approach to examining risk-taking", Current Psychology, 13(4), pp.289~302 (1994), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  4. Ottmar L. Braun, "Psychological antecedents of conspicuous consumption", Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(2), pp.161~187 (1989), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  5. Yuanyuan Cai, "Making an exciting brand big: Brand personality, logo size and brand evaluation", Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 2020, pp.37(3), 259~267[DOI]
  6. Marcello Cantarella, "The uniqueness of risk: The link between need for uniqueness and risk-taking", Personality and Individual Differences, 159, pp.109885~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  7. Dana R. Carney, "The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind", Political Psychology, 29(6), pp.807~840 (2008), Wiley[DOI]
  8. Becky L. Choma, "Risk Propensity Among Liberals and Conservatives", Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(6), pp.713~721 (2014), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  9. Chedia Dhaoui, "An empirical study of luxury brand marketing effectiveness and itsimpact on consumer engagement on Facebook", Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 5(3), pp.209~222 (2014), 한국마케팅과학회[DOI]
  10. John Duckitt, "Personality, Ideology, Prejudice, and Politics: A Dual-Process Motivational Model", Journal of Personality, 78(6), pp.1861~1894 (2010), Wiley[DOI]
  11. Jacqueline K. Eastman, "Status Consumption in Consumer Behavior: Scale Development and Validation", Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), pp.41~52 (2015), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  12. Daniel Fernandes, "Political conservatism and variety-seeking", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), pp.79~86 (2014), Wiley[DOI]
  13. Shreyans Goenka, "The malleable morality of conspicuous consumption.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(3), pp.562~583 (2020), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  14. Jesse Graham, "Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), pp.1029~1046 (2009), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  15. Vladas Griskevicius, "Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), pp.85~102 (2007), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  16. Young Jee Han, "Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence", Journal of Marketing, 74(4), pp.15~30 (2010), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  17. Hayes, A. F., "Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach" (2018), Guilford Press
  18. Ronnie Janoff-Bulman, "To Provide or Protect: Motivational Bases of Political Liberalism and Conservatism", Psychological Inquiry, 20(2-3), pp.120~128 (2009), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  19. Johnson, P. O., "Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems", Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, pp.57~93 (1936)
  20. John T. Jost, "Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.", Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), pp.339~375 (2003), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  21. Jihye Jung, "Political Identity and the Consumer Journey: A Research Review", Journal of Retailing, 96(1), pp.55~73 (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  22. Ryota Kanai, "Political Orientations Are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults", Current Biology, 21(8), pp.677~680 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  23. Romana Khan, "Ideology and Brand Consumption", Psychological Science, 24(3), pp.326~333 (2013), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  24. Blair Kidwell, "Getting Liberals and Conservatives to Go Green: Political Ideology and Congruent Appeals", Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), pp.350~367 (2013), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  25. Claire Heeryung Kim, "Political identity, preference, and persuasion", Social Influence, 13(4), pp.177~191 (2018), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  26. Jeehye Christine Kim, "How Consumers’ Political Ideology and Status-Maintenance Goals Interact to Shape Their Desire for Luxury Goods", Journal of Marketing, 82(6), pp.132~149 (2018), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  27. Amna Kirmani, "Neatly tied with a bow", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), pp.185~186 (2015), Wiley[DOI]
  28. Jayoung Koo, "Going up or down? Effects of power deprivation on luxury consumption", Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, pp.443~449 (2019), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  29. Jaehoon Lee, "Conspicuous Consumption versus Charitable Behavior in Response to Social Exclusion: A Differential Needs Explanation", Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), pp.530~544 (2012), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  30. Jonathan Luffarelli, "Let the Logo Do the Talking: The Influence of Logo Descriptiveness on Brand Equity", Journal of Marketing Research, 56(5), pp.862~878 (2019), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  31. David Martín-Consuegra, "Exploring relationships among brand credibility, purchase intention and social media for fashion brands: A conditional mediation model", Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 9(3), pp.237~251 (2018), 한국마케팅과학회[DOI]
  32. Heather M. Meyer, "Consumer interpretation of brand prominence signals: insights for a broadened typology", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(4), pp.349~358 (2017), Emerald[DOI]
  33. Paul R. Nail, "Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), pp.901~907 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  34. Ordabayeva, N., "Better or different? How political ideology shapes preferences for differentiation in the social hierarchy", Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), pp.227~250 (2018)[DOI]
  35. Neeru Paharia, "Who Is Wary of User Design? The Role of Power-Distance Beliefs in Preference for User-Designed Products", Journal of Marketing, 83(3), pp.91~107 (2019), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  36. Shirish Panchal, "When size does matter: Dominance versus prestige based status signaling", Journal of Business Research, 120, pp.539~550 (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  37. Derek D. Rucker, "Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption", Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), pp.257~267 (2008), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  38. Sheehan, D., "Advances in Consumer Research, 42", pp.677~680 (2014), Association for Consumer Research
  39. Niro Sivanathan, "Protecting the self through consumption: Status goods as affirmational commodities", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3), pp.564~570 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  40. Stephen A. Spiller, "Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression", Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), pp.277~288 (2013), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  41. Joanna Sterling, "Political psycholinguistics: A comprehensive analysis of the language habits of liberal and conservative social media users.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(4), pp.805~834 (2020), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  42. Veblen, T., "The theory of the leisure class" (1994), Dover
  43. Franck Vigneron, "Measuring perceptions of brand luxury", Journal of Brand Management, 11(6), pp.484~506 (2004), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  44. Lukasz Walasek, "Income Inequality and Status Seeking", Psychological Science, 26(4), pp.527~533 (2015), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  45. Don C. Zhang, "Development and validation of the General Risk Propensity Scale (GRiPS)", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(2), pp.152~167 (2019), Wiley[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)