일제 침략 시기 만주 지역 중국 친일문학의 논리구조 ― 왕도낙토론(王道樂土論)과 오족협화론(五族協和論)을 중심으로(1931-1945)
The Logical Structure of Chinese Pro-Japanese Literature in Manchuria during the Period of Japanese Occupation: Focusing on the Theses of the “Kingly Way” and “Concordia of Five Races” (1931-1945)
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In order to discuss pro‐Japanese Chinese literature in the Manchurian area, the present study paid attention first to the logic of ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity(王道樂土論)’ and ‘The theory of harmony of the five races(五族協和論)’, the mottos that the government of Manchukuo(滿洲國) put up from the outset of the state. The foundation of Manchukuo was promoted not by the voluntary will of the residents in the Manchurian area but by the invasive policy of Japanese imperialism, and thus the ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ insisted on by Manchukuo had to be overshadowed by the power of Japanese imperialism that was pursuing supremacy over Asia. Nevertheless, most of pro‐Japanese people in Manchukuo justified their pro‐Japanese logic based on ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity.’ It was because ‘the theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ wore a Confucian coat and thus the pro‐Japanese people could justify their being pro‐Japanese for the cause of Confucian royalty to the king and patriotism. While ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ functioned as a national ideal on the foundation of the country in combination with emperor‐centered imperialism, ‘The theory of harmony of the five races’ was logic for national integration proposed as social implementation of ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity.’ In ‘The theory of harmony of the five races,’ ‘the five races(五族)’ meant the major peoples living in Manchukuo, which were Manchurians, Chinese, Mongolians, Koreans and Japanese. In addition, ‘harmony(協和)’ meant cooperation and peace among the peoples. The authorities of Japanese imperialism and Manchukuo spread the idea through the society arbitrarily and disguised the logic of imperialism shrewdly. Therefore, the logic to spread monarchism through ‘the Manchurian Concordia Association(滿洲協和會)’, to attain cooperation and peace among the races in Manchukuo, and then to take the harmony for the base of the promotion of people's will and the conveyance of the ruler's will to people was in fact nothing but a sophism to keep people ignorant and uncritical, submitting, complying and cooperating to monarchism and imperialism. In brief, ‘The theory of harmony of the five races’ outwardly took the form of equality pursued by an independent country, but in reality, it was typical pro‐Japanese logic aiming to win over Manchurian residents. ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ and ‘The theory of harmony of the five races’ penetrated rapidly into pro‐Japanese literature in those days. In particular, the writers of the ‘Yiwenzhi group(藝文志派)’, which was a representative group of pro‐Japanese authors in Manchukuo, advocated ‘Write-Printism(寫印主義)’ and maintained that writers must commit themselves to writing and publication purposelessly. This may be the literary reflection of ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ lacking criticism of realities and ‘The theory of harmony of the five races’ supporting blind cooperation and reconciliation.
Abstract
In order to discuss pro‐Japanese Chinese literature in the Manchurian area, the present study paid attention first to the logic of ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity(王道樂土論)’ and ‘The theory of harmony of the five races(五族協和論)’, the mottos that the government of Manchukuo(滿洲國) put up from the outset of the state. The foundation of Manchukuo was promoted not by the voluntary will of the residents in the Manchurian area but by the invasive policy of Japanese imperialism, and thus the ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ insisted on by Manchukuo had to be overshadowed by the power of Japanese imperialism that was pursuing supremacy over Asia. Nevertheless, most of pro‐Japanese people in Manchukuo justified their pro‐Japanese logic based on ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity.’ It was because ‘the theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ wore a Confucian coat and thus the pro‐Japanese people could justify their being pro‐Japanese for the cause of Confucian royalty to the king and patriotism. While ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ functioned as a national ideal on the foundation of the country in combination with emperor‐centered imperialism, ‘The theory of harmony of the five races’ was logic for national integration proposed as social implementation of ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity.’ In ‘The theory of harmony of the five races,’ ‘the five races(五族)’ meant the major peoples living in Manchukuo, which were Manchurians, Chinese, Mongolians, Koreans and Japanese. In addition, ‘harmony(協和)’ meant cooperation and peace among the peoples. The authorities of Japanese imperialism and Manchukuo spread the idea through the society arbitrarily and disguised the logic of imperialism shrewdly. Therefore, the logic to spread monarchism through ‘the Manchurian Concordia Association(滿洲協和會)’, to attain cooperation and peace among the races in Manchukuo, and then to take the harmony for the base of the promotion of people's will and the conveyance of the ruler's will to people was in fact nothing but a sophism to keep people ignorant and uncritical, submitting, complying and cooperating to monarchism and imperialism. In brief, ‘The theory of harmony of the five races’ outwardly took the form of equality pursued by an independent country, but in reality, it was typical pro‐Japanese logic aiming to win over Manchurian residents. ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ and ‘The theory of harmony of the five races’ penetrated rapidly into pro‐Japanese literature in those days. In particular, the writers of the ‘Yiwenzhi group(藝文志派)’, which was a representative group of pro‐Japanese authors in Manchukuo, advocated ‘Write-Printism(寫印主義)’ and maintained that writers must commit themselves to writing and publication purposelessly. This may be the literary reflection of ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ lacking criticism of realities and ‘The theory of harmony of the five races’ supporting blind cooperation and reconciliation.
참고문헌 (27)
- 鄭孝胥, "王道政治指導原理 孔敎新編釋義" (1934), 深川母子園出版部
- 鄭孝胥, "(滿州國)王道の片鱗" (1936)
- 佐藤知恭, "回鑾訓民詔書衍義" (1936), 民生部
- 小川平吉, "王道覇道と皇道政治" (1935), 廣文堂書店
- 藝文志事務會, "『藝文志』(半年刊), 新京: 1939. 6.-1940. 6", ~ (1940)
- 藝文書房, "『藝文志』(月刊), 新京: 1943. 11.-1944. 10", ~ (1944)
- 興亞協會, "在滿朝鮮人通信" (1939)
- 儒丐, "福昭創業記, 東方國民文庫" (1939), 滿日文化協會
- 古丁, "滿人作家小說集ㆍ原野" (1939), 三和書房
- 小松, "滿人作家小說集第二集ㆍ蒲公英" (1940), 三和書房
- 古丁, "平沙" (1940), 中央公論社
- 爵靑, "歐陽家的人們" (1945), 國民畵報社
- "東北現代文學大系" (1996), 沈陽出版社
- "中國淪陷區文學大系" (2000), 廣西敎育出版社
- 김재용, "친일문학의 내적 논리" (2003), 역락
- 김재용, "재일본 및 재만주 친일문학의 논리" (2004), 역락
- 김장선, "위만주국시기 조선인 문학과 중국인 문학의 비교 연구" (2004), 역락
- 한수영, "친일문학의 재인식" (2005), 소명출판
- 임성모, "만주국 협화회의 총력전 체제 구상 연구 ― ‘국민운동’ 노선의 모색과 그 성격", 박사, pp.1998
- 송승석, "일제 말기 타이완 일본어문학 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 최정옥, "滿洲國 文學의 硏究", 박사, pp.2007
- 馮爲群, "談東北淪陷時期的文學期刊", 中國現代文學硏究叢刊, 1 (1993), 中國現代文學硏究會
- 黃萬華, "藝文志派四大作家", 中國現代文學硏究叢刊, 1 (1993), 中國現代文學硏究會.
- 劉曉麗, "≪藝文志≫ 雜誌與僞滿洲國時期的文學", 求是學刊, 6 (2005), 黑龍江大學
- 劉曉麗, "僞滿洲國時期附逆作品的表裏", 中國現代文學硏究叢刊, 4 (2006)
- 김미정, "中日戰爭時期 周作人의 親日行爲에 對한 一考察", 中國現代文學, (20) (2001), 韓國中國現代文學學會
- 신정호, "중국 '친일문학' 연구의 시각과 쟁점(1)", 중국어문학, (48), pp.493~522 (2006), 영남중국어문학회
