주성치 영화의 홍콩적 가치, 패스티쉬와 로컬리즘
Hongkongism in Stephen Chiau Sing-chi’s Cinema, Pastiche and Localism
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to show the Hongkongism in Stephen Chiau Sing-chi's cinema by analyzing how he creates his own sense of humour and whether it has any type. Above all, I would like to correct the 'Reductionistic Reading' which confuses Hongkongese identities with the political insecurities caused by restitution of Hongkong to China in 1997. Of course, nostalgic images in some of his movies may recall pre-1997 Hong Kong. However, these images are different from political parody because they do not contain a special deconstruction or fundamental curiosity but just a random summation of empty images. Another common love affair and happy-ending structure combined with those empty images may be one reason why his cinema cannot be categorized into post-modern. Locality dominates Stephen Chiau Sing-chi's cinema. First, his cinema take advantage of Hong Kong viewers by using music and words of Cantonese Opera. Second, his cinema is in line with social comedies which feature typical man-heroes of Cantonese Camp. These two characteristics make his cinema lie in traditional formaility and concept. However, there are some aspects of post-moderns; Speaking metaphor through the mouths of Bruce Lee and Jackie Chan, Using fake images to confuse time-based narratives, Borrowing images from cartoons or commercials. His cinema tickle the old nostalgia of Hong Kong movie-goers on the one hand, make the overseas viewers get accustomed to a new sense of humour without learning a new culture. ‘Moleitau' is, in a untshell, something located in the border between the tradition and post-modern. In the borderline, tradition and post-modern crashes each other forwarding imperfection to the viewers. This lower-class aesthetics make people laugh in a very convenient manner. This mix of traditional concepts and post-modern formailities and the sense of humor in them could explain the paradoxical identities of politically alienated Hong Kong as well as Contemporaries.
Abstract
This article aims to show the Hongkongism in Stephen Chiau Sing-chi's cinema by analyzing how he creates his own sense of humour and whether it has any type. Above all, I would like to correct the 'Reductionistic Reading' which confuses Hongkongese identities with the political insecurities caused by restitution of Hongkong to China in 1997. Of course, nostalgic images in some of his movies may recall pre-1997 Hong Kong. However, these images are different from political parody because they do not contain a special deconstruction or fundamental curiosity but just a random summation of empty images. Another common love affair and happy-ending structure combined with those empty images may be one reason why his cinema cannot be categorized into post-modern. Locality dominates Stephen Chiau Sing-chi's cinema. First, his cinema take advantage of Hong Kong viewers by using music and words of Cantonese Opera. Second, his cinema is in line with social comedies which feature typical man-heroes of Cantonese Camp. These two characteristics make his cinema lie in traditional formaility and concept. However, there are some aspects of post-moderns; Speaking metaphor through the mouths of Bruce Lee and Jackie Chan, Using fake images to confuse time-based narratives, Borrowing images from cartoons or commercials. His cinema tickle the old nostalgia of Hong Kong movie-goers on the one hand, make the overseas viewers get accustomed to a new sense of humour without learning a new culture. ‘Moleitau' is, in a untshell, something located in the border between the tradition and post-modern. In the borderline, tradition and post-modern crashes each other forwarding imperfection to the viewers. This lower-class aesthetics make people laugh in a very convenient manner. This mix of traditional concepts and post-modern formailities and the sense of humor in them could explain the paradoxical identities of politically alienated Hong Kong as well as Contemporaries.
참고문헌 (29)
- Bryan Walsh, "Time, April 28, 2003", ~ (2003)
- Leo Braudy Marshall Cohen, "The Film Theory and Criticism" (1999), Oxford
- Peter Brooker, "Post modern after-images A Reader in Film, Television and Video" (1997), Arnold
- Esther Yau, "At Full Speed-Homg kong cinema in a Borderless world" (2001), University of Minnesota Press
- Kim Young Mi, "Le Kung-Fu comique de Jackey Chan: une nouvell possibilité de la narration du corps", Degres(Revue de synthese a orientatin semiologique), 137 (2009)
- Poshek Fu, "The cinema of Hong Kong History, Arts, Identity" (2002), Cambridge University
- S.V. Srinivas, "Kung Fu Hustle: a note on the local", Inter-Asia Cutural Studies, 6 (2005)
- Stephen Teo, "HongKong Cinema ― The extra dimensions" (1977), British Film Institute
- 김수현, "코미디, 중국인들은 어떤 얼굴로 웃는가. in: 영화로 읽는 중국" (2006), 동녘
- 김영미, "遊'- You- U... cc - UCC, 쓸모없음의 생산적 의미", 중국어문학지, (24), pp.89~111 (2007), 중국어문학회
- 김영미, "그녀는 추하기 짝이 없었다 그리고 왕비가 되었다", 중국어문학지, 9 (2001), 중국어문학회
- 김영미, "좀도둑이야기 - 武丑 동작의 성격표출과 이야기성", 중어중문학, (43), pp.225~246 (2008), 한국중어중문학회
- "『大公報』, 1995.8.30일자", ~ (1995)
- 린다 허치언, "패러디이론" (1995), 문예출판사
- 마이크 페더스톤, "포스트모더니즘과 소비문화" (1991), 현대미학사
- 베르그송, "웃음" (2000), 세계사
- 스티브 코너, "포스트모던 TV, 비디오, 그리고 영화", 외국문학, (27) (1991)
- 임춘성, "홍콩과 홍콩인의 정체성" (2006), 학연문화사
- 애덤 로버츠, "트랜스 비평가 프레드릭 제임슨" (2007), 앨피
- 움베르토 에코, "추의 역사" (2008), 열린 책들
- 유영하, "홍콩이라는 문화공간" (2008), 아름나무
- 高學民, "後現代文化語境下的解構與狂歡", 석사, pp.2003
- 趙尋, "不同時代社會變化心理的鏡像解讀. in: 大众文艺" (2009), 北京师范大学艺术与传媒学院
- 中國臺港電影硏究會, "香港電影回顧" (2000), 北京電影出版社
- 蔡洪聲, "香港電影80年" (2000), 北京廣播學院出版社
- 戚錳, "90分鍾狂歡" (2004), 北京電影學院學報
- 包兆會, "無厘頭文化中喜劇的笑與中國式後現代", 文藝爭鳴 (2006)
- 黃建東, "1997-2003 香港喜劇電影的類型嬗變", 석사, pp.2005
- "『香巷經濟日報』, 1995.8.27일자", ~ (1995)
