본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

“소비자 - 기업 협력”에 대한 탐색적 연구: 소비자 참여 마케팅 활동 사례의 비판적 고찰

The Concept of Consumer - Business Collaboration: Its Potential and Its Limitations Shown by Critical Review of Consumer Participation Marketing Cases in Korea

2

조회

0

다운로드

21

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

공존과 협력이 화두인 현대 사회에서 소비자와 기업은 더 이상 대치관계가 아니다. 이에 본 연구는 소비자와 기업이 협력적 관계를 모색해야 하는 의미와 소비자 - 기업의 협력적 관계의 필요조건을 고찰하고자 하였으며 소비자 - 기업이 진정한 의미의 동반자(partner)가 되기 위해서 필요한 노력에 대해 제언하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 우선 소비자와 기업의 협력의 한 방법은 소비자가 기업의 다양한 활동에 참여하는 것을 들 수 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 특히 현대 기업의 필수적인 마케팅 기법이라고 할 수 있는 소비자 참여 마케팅 활동의 사례를 대상으로 이러한 활동이 소비자와 기업의 진정한 협력과 동반자적 관계에 부합하는지를 확인하고자 하였다. 국내 기업들이 주로 수행하고 있는 소비자 참여 마케팅 활동은 아이디어 공모전, 소비자 모니터 활동, 체험단 활동, 파워 블로거의 이용 등으로 나타나 이에 대한 탐색을 시도하였다. 소비자 참여 마케팅 활동을 분석하기 하기 위하여 Prahalad와 Ramaswamy(2004)의 DART모형을 분석의 기본틀로 활용하였다. 이 모형은 소비자와 기업의 상호작용에 관한 최초의 모형임에 의의가 있으나, 제시하고 있는 내용이 개념적인 수준에 머물고 있다. 따라서 대등한 관계에서의 협력 조건에 대한 구체적인 분석틀의 마련을 위하여 기업간 협력에 관한 조건을 추가로 고찰하여 분석틀을 완성하였다. 그 결과 소비자 - 기업간 협력 활동을 위해서 소비자의 자발적인 참여를 위한 보상 개념의 명확화, 협력 활동의 결과로 얻어진 이득의 배분에 대한 재정의, 소비자와 기업의 신뢰를 답보하는 요소에 대한 규명, 소비자 - 기업간 협력 활동을 통한 가치 창출의 개념을 명확화 하는 것이 필요하다는 결론을 얻었다. 본 연구는 소비자와 기업의 직접적인 협력으로서 소비자 참여 마케팅 활동에 대한 연구를 수행했다는 것에 의의가 있으며 향후 소비자 - 기업간 바람직한 협력 관계에 대한 구체적이고 실질적인 논의가 진행되어야 할 것이다.

Abstract

The concept of Consumer-Business Collaboration is gaining importance in information society in which the notion of coexistence is critical. Several reasons could be behind the shift in paradigm from that of competition to that of collaboration between consumers and businesses. First driving force of such change can be found on consumer side. In the information age, consumers could access information that were not available to them before and they are able to modify, produce and share information with other consumers, and such informed consumers become empowered in the market. From business perspective, collaboration is essential element in business success and sustainability. Businesses began collaborating with odd partners such as competitors, stakeholders and labor union. In order to succeed and cope with fast changing market conditions, it is important for businesses to form partnership with consumers and feel the needs of consumers and respond to them in an appropriate and timely manner. Consumer-Business Collaboration is useful not only to businesses but also to consumers in the sense it ultimately contributes to the realization of consumer sovereignty in the market. More specifically, where as the concept of dollar vote, a traditionally discussed means of realizing consumer sovereignty, has been criticized as being a remedial approach to what is already offered in the market, the potential of Consumer-Business Collaboration lies in the possibility that consumers’ needs and preferences can be communicated to businesses before the actual production happens, and thus making the distribution of social resources more ideal and effective by consumers. A common movement in marketing activities that are prevailing lately is using consumer participation as means of marketing, and claims have been made that such activities are examples of Consumer-Business Collaboration. The basic idea behind such marketing activity is to allow or to encourage consumers to participate in the process of marketing by providing input into business activities. However, those activities are yet to be critically examined from consumers’ perspective to ensure that they truly represent Consumer-Business Collaboration, and provide benefits to consumers, as well as to businesses. The purpose of this study is two folds: 1) to provide an overview of the concept of Consumer- Business Collaboration, and to identify the necessary conditions for its success, and 2) to critically review the business practice of consumer participation marketing and analyze whether or not such practices fall short of the idea of Consumer-Business Collaboration. The framework for analysing consumer participation marketing activities and their qualification as Consumer-Business Collaboration was based on Prahalad and Ramaswamy(2004)’s DART (Dialogue-Access-Risk Benefits-Transparency) Model. While the model provides wonderful insights with regards to factors necessary in Consumer-Business Collaboration, since the proposed DART model was conceptual, this study also reviewed empirical analysis that looked at business cooperations and adopted the essential conditions of business cooperations and extended those conditions to Consumer-Business Collaboration context. Final framework for analysis is composed as follows. First, “Dialogue” examined the value creation that is useful to consumer and business directly, durability of relations, participation initiative, opening of important result of collaboration, and two-way interaction(communication). Second, “Access” examined the possibility of always being able to approach partners and whether or not an open channel of communication existed. Third, “Risk-Benefit” examined whether there is a process to identify and choose the partners with the necessary qualifications, and protection of partner’s private information. Lastly, “Transparency” examined the sharing the collaboration benefit. Using this framework, common consumer marketing activities that are popular in Korean context such as Idea contest, Consumer monitor groups, Product experience group managed by businesses and the phenomena of Power blogger were analyzed. The major findings of the study are as follows: First, evaluating the ‘Dialogue’ dimension, while the actitivities analyzed had some component of consumers’ voluntary participation, the nature of volunteering is very much limited in the sense that most activities are originally initiated by businesses and only a small fraction of consumers participate. Participation should be made on the common understanding of the purpose of collaboration, which needs to be strengthened for a more successful consumer-business collaboration. Also although all activities analyzed incorporate communications of some sort between consumers and businesses, the quality of such communication was found to be quite limited in the sense that it was only one-way or there was no way for consumers to initiate the conversation. Evaluating from ‘Access’ dimension, consumer monitoring activities and activities of power bloggers showed the highest level of openness and consistency. Due to the development of IT, it seemed that establishing an open and consistent communication channel was fairly common and easy, but maintaining the channel open is a difficult job, for which more effective strategies should be researched. Analyses also showed that the amount and the quality of information given to consumers were highest for consumer monitoring activities. The analyses showed that businesses also can gather the most beneficial information from consumers through consumer monitoring activities, showing that the more risk, the more gain. In terms of sharing benefits, it is our discovery that the boundary of benefits that need to be shared among consumers and business should be more finely defined, in the sense that if the benefit is too narrowly defined, consumers who participate may be reduced to the status of employee of business that are hired on need base, and inappropriately paid. Among the four marketing activities that are done through consumer participation, consumer monitoring activities was identified as the most desirable form of Consumer-Business collaboration. While such activities thus far had been commonly initiated by business, consumer could initiate such activity by using consumer community or personal blogs. We have following suggestions for improving Consumer-Business collaboration. It is necessary 1) to clearly define what constitutes of rewards of collaboration on both parties, 2) set up a transparent system that distributes the gains from the collaboration to both consumers and businesses, 3) to find a mechanism that builds trust between consumer and business and 4) to clearly define what the values of such collaboration is. By making improvements in these aspect, Consumer-Business collaboration that is sustainable and mutually beneficial can be established, and maintained.

참고문헌 (77)

  1. 권영철, "국제합작제휴의 파트너십 결정 요인과 성과에 관한 실증연구", 경영저널, 2(1), pp.1~24 (2001)
  2. 구혜경, "내용분석과 소비자평가를 통한 기업 홈페이지 연구", 석사, pp.2002
  3. 김기찬, "대?중소기업 상생협력의 이론적 모형 설계 -건강하고 지속가능한 기업생태계 구축-", 중소기업연구, 28(3), pp.381~410 (2006), 한국중소기업학회
  4. 김난도, "불황기 소비 변화:학습지 아줌마와 우유배달 아저씨가 경쟁관계가 된 이유는?", 조선일보 토일 섹션(weeklybiz),\ 제 27242호, ~ (2009)
  5. 김도정, "고객 가치 창조, 상상력과 공감에 달렸다", LG Business Insight 2008년 8월6일자 LGERI 리포트면, ~ (2008)
  6. 김성훈, "제품 관여도 및 제품 지식에 따른 온라인 구전정보 활용 연구", 광고학연구, 14(1), pp.257~280 (2003), 한국광고학회
  7. 김용준, "디지털 아줌마", 광고학연구, 15(5), pp.423~438 (2004)
  8. 김형택, "인터넷 마케팅.COM" (2000), 삼각형 M&B
  9. 김철환, "상생은 선택이 아닌 21세기 필수요소", 대‧중소기업 상생협력 국제 컨퍼런스 (2006), 해양한국
  10. 박정현, "New 소비코드 5", LG주간경제 CEO 리포트면 7월 4일자, ~ (2007)
  11. 박충환, "시장 지향적 마케팅 관리" (2003), 박영사
  12. 박흥수, "기업의 마케팅 제휴가 기업의 수익성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 제휴의 강도와 기업 간 경쟁 정도의 상호작용 효과를 중심으로", 2008년 한국경영학회 통합학술대회, pp.1~26 (2008)
  13. 배영기, "노동윤리 상생론적 접근", 정책과학연구, 18(2), pp.61~77 (2008)
  14. 배종태, "대?중소기업 신제품개발 협력과정과 상생정책", 중소기업연구, 29(4), pp.295~318 (2007), 한국중소기업학회
  15. 백혜란, "프로슈머 개념화와 성향 측정 도구 개발", 박사, pp.2008
  16. 서문식, "서비스 산업에서의 고객참여 측정도구 개발: PARTICQUAL", 마케팅연구, 23(4), pp.105~135 (2008), 한국마케팅학회
  17. 서정희, "소비자주권에 관한 연구", 소비자학연구, 2(1), pp.58~75 (1991)
  18. 성영신, "당신이 움직이는 세상; 권력의 이동:기업에서 소비자로", 한국심리학회 연차학술발표대회, pp.354~355 (2008)
  19. 성영신, "Word of Mouth: Online 상의 소비 구전 정보 연구", 한국광고학회 연차 학술대회, pp.3~12 (2001)
  20. 손민선, "주부 블로거 스타, 와이프로거(wifelogger)가 뜬다", LG주간경제 경영정보면 7월 26일자, ~ (2006)
  21. 송창석, "인터넷의 상호작용성 제고방안에 관한 연구", 마케팅연구, 14(3), pp.69~95 (1999)
  22. "소비자 주권과 경제적 민주주의"[URL]
  23. 이근식, "자유와 상생:신자유주의와 새로운 직업 윤리의 모색", 기업윤리연구, 10, pp.87~120 (2005)
  24. 이기춘, "21세기 가정학의 발전적 과제", 대한가정학회지, 34(6), pp.47~63 (1997)
  25. 이기춘, "정보화, 세계화를 중심으로 한 생활과학의 새로운 지평", 대한가정학회지, 27(7), pp.1~16 (1999)
  26. 이기춘, "소비자학의 이해" (2001), 학현사
  27. "숫자로 보는 공모전 매력 포인트"[URL]
  28. 이석호, "국내 기업들의 인터넷을 이용한 마케팅 활동과 유효성 평가실태에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1997
  29. 이상우, "노사파트너십을 통한 협조적 노사관계형성 가능성탐색 : 영국의 경우를 통해", 국제지역연구, 8(3), pp.305~321 (2004), 국제지역연구센터
  30. 이우용, "마케팅 역량 강화를 위한 공동 마케팅의 전략적 활용", 서강경영논총, 9, pp.343~357 (1998), 서강대학교경영학 연구원
  31. 이정배, "가치 창출형 마케팅 조직으로 변신하라", LG주간경제 2007년 5월 23일 경영정보면, ~ (2007)
  32. 임종원, "디지털 환경 하의 유통 경로 변화", 서울대학교 경영대학 전자상거래지원센터, ~ (2002)
  33. 전종근, "브랜드 제휴에서 제품적합성과 개별 브랜드 개성의 역할", 2008 한국경영학회 통합학술대회, pp.1~12 (2008)
  34. 정수연, "온라인 구전에 관한 내용분석; 몰유형과 제품 유형에 따른 차이를 중심으로", 한국경영정보학회 춘계학술대회, pp.497~505 (2005)
  35. 정재영, "웹 2.0시대, 사업의 패러다임이 바뀐다", LG주간경제 산업정보면 5월 17일자, ~ (2006)
  36. 정재윤, "나이키의 상태는 닌텐도다" (2007), 마젤란
  37. 정지혜, "프로슈머 마케팅의 성공 포인트", LG주간 경제 경영정보면 3월 31일자, ~ (2004)
  38. 지회권, "프로슈머가 정보제공 채널로서 소비자구매 행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 - 국내 자동차 소비자를 대상으로", 석사, pp.2007
  39. 최완, "마케팅 수단으로서의 인터넷 활용에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1997
  40. 홍성태, "고객 참여의 이론적 고찰과 활용 방안", 사회과학연구, 3(2), pp.1~14 (2004), 상명대학교 사회과학연구소
  41. Ballantyne, D., "Dialogue and its role in the development of relationship specific knowledge", Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 19(2), pp.114~123 (2004)
  42. Bateson, John E. G., "Self-Service Consumer: An Explorative Study", Journal of Retailing, 61(3), pp.49~76 (1985)
  43. Bernald L. Simonin, "The Importance of collaborative Know-how: An Empirical test of the learning organization", Academy of management Journal, 40(5), pp.1150~1174 (1997)
  44. Berthon, P., "Beyond Market Orientation: A Conceptualization of Market Evaluation", Journal of Interactive Marketing, 14(3), pp.50~66 (2000), \
  45. Bettencourt, L. A., "Customer Voluntary Performance: Customer As Partner In Service Delivery", Journal of Retailing, 73(3), pp.383~406 (1997)
  46. Bucklin, L. P., "Organizing Successful Co-Marketing Alliance", Journal of Marketing, 57, pp.32~46 (1993)
  47. Etgar, M., "Co-production of services:A Managerial extension", The Service dominant logic of marketing: Dialogue, debate and directions, pp.28~138 (2006)
  48. Fitzsimmons, James A., "Consumer Participation and Productivity in Service Operations", Interface, 15(3), pp.60~67 (1985)
  49. Garman, E. Thomas, "Consumer Economic Issue in America, 3rd ed" (1995), Dame Publications
  50. Goodwin, Cathy, "I Can Do Myself: Training the Service Consumer to Contribute", The Journal of Service Marketing, 2(4), pp.71~78 (1988)
  51. Gummesson, E., "Extending the Servicedominant Logic : from Customer Centricity to Balanced Centricity", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, pp.15~17 (2008)
  52. "Commercial Senarios for the Web: pportunities and Challenges"[URL]
  53. Hutt, W. M., "Economic and the Public: A Study of Competition and Openion" (1936), Jonathan Cape, Ltd
  54. Jaworski, B., "Co-Creating the Voice of the Customer", The Service dominant logic of marketing: Dialogue, debate and directions, pp.109~117 (2006)
  55. Kalaignanam, K., "Customer as Co-Producers: Implications for Marketing Strategy Effectiveness and Marketing Operations Efficiency", The Service dominant logic of marketing: Dialogue, debate and directions, pp.166~180 (2006)
  56. Kambil, A. G., "Co-Creation: A new source of value", Outlook, 2, pp.38~43 (1999)
  57. Kelly, S. W., "Cusotomer Participation in Service Production and Delivery", Journal of Retailing, 66(3), pp.315~335 (1990)
  58. Kotler, P., "Marketing Management, Englewood Cliffs" (2002), Prentice Hall
  59. Levy, S. J., "How New, How Dominant?", pp.57~64 (2006), The Service dominant logic of Marketing: dialogue, debate and directions
  60. Lovelock, C. H., "Look to consumers to Increase Producivity", Harvard Business Review, 57, pp.168~178 (1979)
  61. Mckenna, R., "Real Time Marketing", Havard Business Review, 73(4), pp.87~95 (1995)
  62. Norman. R., "Designing Interactive Strategy: From Value Chain to Value Constellation, Chichester" (1994), Wiley
  63. Parasuraman, A., "A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implications for Future Research", Journal of Marketing, 49, pp.41~50 (1985)
  64. Payne A. F., "Managing the Co-Creation of Value", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 136, pp.83~96 (2008)
  65. Prahalad C. K., "Co-opting Customer Competence", Harvard Business Review, 78(1), pp.79~87 (2000)
  66. Prahalad C. K., "Co-Creation Experiences: The Next Practice in Value Creation", Journal of Interative Marketing, 18(3), pp.5~18 (2004)
  67. Reichheld, F. F., "Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Service", Harvard Business Review, 68(5), pp.105~111 (1990)
  68. Samuelson P. A., "Economics, 12th ed" (1985), Mcgrawhill
  69. Sheth. Jagdish N., "Implications of Revised Definition of Marketing: From Exchange to Value Creation)", Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 26(2), pp.302~307 (2007)
  70. Solomon, M. R. C., "Rloe Theory Perspective on Dyadic Interactions: The Service Encounter", Journal of Marketing, 49, pp.99~111 (1985)
  71. Stan, R., "The Great Marketing Turnaround" (2000), Prentice Hall
  72. Toffler, A., "Revolutionary Wealth" (2006), 청림출판사
  73. Varadarajan, P. R., "Symbiotic Marketing Revisited", Journal of Marketing, 50, pp.7~17 (1986)
  74. Vargo, S. L., "Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing", Journal of Marketing, 68, pp.1~17 (2004)
  75. Vargo, S. L., "Service Dominant Logic: What it is, What itis not, What it might be" (2006), M. E. Sharpe
  76. Wikstrom, S.(, "Value Creation by company- Consumer Interaction", Journal of Marketing Management, 12, pp.359~374 (1996)
  77. Customization: The Next Revolution in Mass Customization, "Wind, J.", Marketing Science Institute, ~, pp.No. 00-108 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)