본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

익살스런 귀여움(Whimsical Cuteness)이 소비자의 쾌락적 구매 의도에 미치는 영향: 죄책감의 조절 효과를 중심으로

The Impact of Whimsical Cuteness on Consumer’s Hedonic Purchase Intentions: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Guilt

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

귀여움에 대한 기업과 소비자의 관심이 증가함에 따라 귀여움의 유형과 특성, 그리고 귀여움이 소비자 행동에 미 치는 영향을 심리학적 관점에서 규명할 필요성도 커지고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 귀여움의 유형 중 하나인 익살스런 귀여움이 소비자의 쾌락적 구매 의도에 미치는 영향을 검증하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 총 3개의 실험을 진행하 였다. 163 명의 참가자를 대상으로 진행한 연구 1a에서는 익살스런 귀여움 조건의 소비자가 통제 조건에 비해 쾌 락적 속성이 우수한 제품의 구매 의도가 더 높음을 확인하였다. 169 명의 참가자를 대상으로 진행한 연구 1b에서 는 통제 조건에 비해 익살스런 귀여움 조건의 소비자가 실용 목적 구매상황보다 쾌락 목적 구매상황에서 구매 의도 가더높은것으로나타났다. 또한익살스런귀여움과쾌락적구매의도의관계를자기보상초점이매개함을발견 하였다. 연구 2에서는 익살스런 귀여움과 쾌락적 구매 의도의 관계에서 죄책감의 조절효과를 확인하였다. 221 명의 참가자를 대상으로 진행한 연구 결과, 죄책감을 경험할 경우 익살스런 귀여움이 쾌락적 소비에 미치는 영향력이 유 의미하게 감소하였다. 본 연구는 익살스런 귀여움이 쾌락적 구매 의도에 미치는 영향과 죄책감의 조절 효과를 확인 하였다는 점에서 관련 연구자와 마케팅 실무자에게 중요한 함의를 제공할 것으로 기대한다.

Abstract

Drawing upon increasing interests in cuteness appeal in marketing area, there is a growing need to identify the type and characteristics of cuteness and its impacts on consumer behavior from a psychological perspective. Previous research suggested there are two types of cuteness. One type of cuteness is kinchenschema(baby schema) cuteness. It occurs after exposure to babies or baby animals which have baby characteristics. The other type of cuteness is whimsical cuteness. It occurs after exposure to imaginary characters or a pattern of circles. This research focused on the role of whimsical cuteness in consumers’hedonic purchase intentions. In particular, three studies were conducted to examine the positive relations between whimsical cuteness and hedonic purchase intentions. Firstly, study 1a questioned whether whimsical cuteness would increase purchase intentions for products of which hedonic features were superior. Responses of 163 participants were collected from the Amazon Mechanical Turk (Mturk). The 2-between subject design was implemented. That is ,participants were randomly assigned to be presented one of two gift cards: a whimsical cuteness card or a control card. And they chose a headset between two different one by using assigned card. One headset had superior hedonic features than utilitarian features. The other headset had superior utilitarian features than hedonic features. Results indicated that, compared to those in a control condition, consumers in whimsical cuteness condition showed stronger intentions to purchase a product with superior hedonic features. Secondly, study 1b investigated the effect of whimsical cuteness on consumers' hedonic purchase intentions further manipulating the goal of product purchase. 169 subjects participated in the study via the Amazon Mechanical Turk (Mturk). Participants were divided 4 groups (2 cuteness(whimsical cuteness condition, control condition) X 2 consumption goal (hedonic consumption goal condition, utilitarian consumption goal condition)). They were randomly assigned to see one of the gift cards: whimsical cuteness condition, control condition. They were also randomly assigned to see one of the consumption goal scenario: hedonic consumption goal condition, utilitarian consumption goal condition. And they chose a scale about purchase intentions of using restaurant. Using restaurant in hedonic consumption goal condition was for fun. But using restaurant in utilitarian consumption goal condition was for studying foreign culture. After that, they responded to questions about checking the self- rewarding focus and the card manipulation. Consistent with study 1a, it was confirmed that consumers experienced whimsical cuteness were more likely to purchase a product when a hedonic consumption goal was assumed rather than an utilitarian goal was served. In study 1b, the relationship between whimsical cuteness and hedonic purchase intentions was found to be mediated by the self-rewarding focus. Finally, study 2 was conducted to confirm whether guilt would mitigate the impact of whimsical cuteness on the consumers' hedonic purchase intentions. Data were collected from 221 participants via the Amazon Mechanical Turk (Mturk). Participants were divided 6 groups (3 cuteness(whimsical cuteness condition, kindchenschema(baby schema) cuteness condition, control condition) X 2 guilt(guilt condition, control condition)). They were randomly assigned to see one of the gift cards: whimsical cuteness condition, kindchenschema (baby schema) cuteness condition, control condition. They were also randomly assigned to recall one of the guilt experience: guilt condition, control condition. And they chose a headset between two different one by using assigned card. One headset had superior hedonic features than utilitarian features. The other headset had superior utilitarian features than hedonic features. After that, they responded to questions about checking the card manipulation. As expected, the moderating effect of guilt in the relationship between whimsical cuteness and hedonic purchase intentions was found. Specifically, experience of guilt significantly decreased the effect of whimsical cuteness on hedonic purchase intentions. The findings from current research proposed both theoretical and practical implications. It had a theoretical implication in that it had expanded its cuteness to a new level. This was because the emotions caused by the two cuteness, kindchenschema(baby schema) cuteness and whimsical cuteness, were different. Kindchenshcema(baby schema) cuteness induced caring feelings. But whimsical cuteness created fun and increased consumers’ hedonic purchase intentions. In particular, the characteristics of the whimsical cuteness were embodied through product properties and purchase purpose. Also, it had a theoretical implication in that it had identified the effect of guilt as a moderating variable. It was necessary to study situations in which the effects of whimsical cuteness did not occur. Therefore, we had verified the role of essential emotion called guilt that was not directly related to the consumer. This study had practical implication for the production of products by enterprises. For example, for a product with a cute design, it would be advantageous to emphasize hedonic features than to emphasize utilitarian features. And enterprises will also need to consider the level of guilt an individual will experience in the product purchase phase. Limitations and Future possible studies were also discussed.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 서울경제, "라인프렌즈, 샤오미 속으로 쏙~", 서울경제 (2019.4.4), ~ (2019)
  2. 아시아경제, "이디야커피, 카카오프렌즈와손잡은 음료․MD 대박났다", 아시아경제 (2019.6.13), ~ (2019)
  3. 전자신문, "GS리테일 PB상품, ‘레드닷 디자인 어워드’ 본상 수상", 전자신문 (2018.8.20), ~ (2018)
  4. Arnold, M. Jay., "Approach and avoidance motivation: investigating hedonic consumption in a retail setting", Journal of Retailing, 88(3), pp.399~411 (2012)
  5. Baumeister Roy F., "Yielding to temptation : Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior", Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), pp.670~676 (2002)
  6. Baumeister, Roy F., "Guilt: an interpersonal approach", Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), pp.243~267 (1994)
  7. Botti, Simona, "The locus of choice : Personal causality and satisfaction with hedonic and utilitarian decisions", Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), pp.1065~1078 (2010)
  8. Bradshaw, John WS, "Could empathy for animals have been an adaptation in the evolution of Homo sapiens", Animal Welfare, 19(1), pp.107~112 (2010)
  9. Carver, Charles S., "Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment : the BIS", BAS scales, 1994, pp.67(2), 319~333
  10. Cho, Sookyung, "Aesthetic and Value Judgment of Neotenous Objects: Cuteness as a Design Factor and its Effects on Product Evaluation", Doctor, pp.2012
  11. Chun, HaeEun, "Making prudent vs. impulsive choices : the role of anticipated shame and guilt on consumer self-control", Advances in Consumer Research, 34, pp.715~719 (2007)
  12. Dhar, Ravi, "Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods", Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), pp.60~71 (2000)
  13. Glocker, Melanie. L., "Baby schema in infant faces induces cuteness perception and motivation for caretaking in adults", Ethology, 115(3), pp.257~263 (2009)
  14. Gorn, Gerald J., "Babyfaces, trait inferences, and company evaluations in a public relations crisis", Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), pp.36~49 (2008)
  15. Gray, Jeffrey A, "Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity : A commentary", Journal of Research in Personality, 21(4), pp.493~509 (1987)
  16. Greenwald, Anthony G., "Within-subjects designs : to use or not to use", Psychological Bulletin, 83, pp.314~320 (1976)
  17. Hayes, Andrew F., "Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach" (2013), Guilford Press
  18. Hellen, Katarina, "Development of a scale measuring childlike anthropomorphism in products", Journal of Marketing Management, 29(1-2), pp.141~157 (2013)
  19. Higgins, E. Tory, "Promotion and Prevention:Regulatory Focus as a Motivational Principle", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30(1998), pp.1~46 (1998)
  20. Hung, Iris W., "Lenses of the heart: How actors’ and observers’ perspectives influence emotional experiences", Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), pp.1103~1115 (2012)
  21. Kivetz, Ran, "Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards", Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), pp.155~170 (2002)
  22. Lee, Hsiao-Ching, "The spell of cuteness in food consumption? It depends on food type and consumption motivation", Food Quality and Preference, 65(4), pp.110~117 (2018)
  23. Lefebvre, Sarah, "The effects of guilt and sadness on sugar consumption", Journal of Business Research, 100, pp.130~138 (2019)
  24. Lockwood, Penelope, "Motivation by positive or negative role models : regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), pp.854~864 (2002)
  25. Lorenz, Konrad, "Die angeborenen formen möglicher erfahrung", Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 5(2), pp.235~409 (1943)
  26. Lu, Jingyi, "Hedonic products for you, utilitarian products for me", Judgment & Decision Making, 11(4), pp.332~341 (2016)
  27. Lundholm, Helge, "The Affective Tone of Lines : Experimental Researches", Psychological Review, 28(1), pp.43~60 (1921)
  28. MacInnis, Deborah J., "Spotlight on affect : Affect and affective forecasting in impulse control", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(3), pp.224~231 (2006)
  29. Marcus, Aaron, "The cult of cute : The challenge of user experience design", Interactions, 9(6), pp.29~34 (2002)
  30. McManus, I. C., ""Fun, fun, fun" : Types of fun, attitudes to fun, and their relation to personality and biographical factors", Psychology, 1(3), pp.159~168 (2010)
  31. Nenkov, Gergana Y., ""So cute I could eat it up" : priming effects of cute products on indulgent consumption", Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), pp.326~341 (2014)
  32. Okada, Erica Mina, "Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods", Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), pp.43~53 (2005)
  33. Poulton, E. C., "Unwanted range effects from using within-subjects experimental designs", Psychological Bulletin, 81, pp.201~203 (1973)
  34. Scott, Maura L., "Using consumer responsibility reminders to reduce cuteness-induced indulgent consumption", Marketing Letters, 27(2), pp.323~336 (2016)
  35. Shafir, Eldar, "Reason-based choice", Cognition, 49(1-2), pp.11~36 (1993)
  36. Xu, Hanyi, "Guilt and guiltlessness : an integrative review", Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(7), pp.440~457 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)