본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전립선암 발견에 있어 경직장 초음파 검사의 유용성: 전립선특이항원 수치가 10 ng/ml 이하인 환자를 대상으로

Effectiveness of the Transrectal Ultrasonography in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: in Patients with Prostate Specific Antigen of 10 ng/ml or Less

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Background: This study was performed to reconsider the efficacy of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in diagnosing prostate cancer by analyzing the results of a digital rectal examination (DRE), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and a transrectal ultrasonography in patients with prostate specific antigen levels of 10 ng/ml or less. Materials and Methods: One-hundred and eighty one men with PSA levels of 10 ng/ml or less, who had a TRUS-guided tissue biopsy performed, were included in this study. The detection rate of prostate cancer was compared according to the TRUS result and the presence or absence of nodularity and the consistency of the prostate on DRE. Results: In a total 181 patients, there were 73 patients with PSA levels of 4 ng/ml or less and 4 of them had prostate cancer. Thre were 108 patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml and 18 of them were prostate cancer. TRUS was performed in 152 patients and 16 out of 58 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, 3 out of 39 diagnosed with suspicious prostate cancer, and 2 out of 55 patients diagnosed as having no prostate cancer were found to have prostate cancer. In 40 patients, a nodule was palpated on DRE and 8 of them were found to have prostate cancer. Five out of 19 patients with a stony hard consistency, 3 of 12 with a firm to hard consisency, 12 of 129 with a firm consistency, 0 of 13 with a soft to firm consistency, and 2 of 8 with a soft consistency were prostate cancer. In the prostate cancer patients, there were 4 patients with PSA levels of 4 ng/ml or less and all these patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer or suspicious prostate cancer on TRUS but the nodule was not palpated in all patients. Two were soft and 2 were firm consistency on DRE. Conclusion: In patients with serum PSA levels of 10 ng/ml or less, TRUS is a more useful supporting method than DRE and a more active application of TRUS may lead to an early diagnosis and pertinent treatment of prostate cancer.

Abstract

Background: This study was performed to reconsider the efficacy of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in diagnosing prostate cancer by analyzing the results of a digital rectal examination (DRE), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and a transrectal ultrasonography in patients with prostate specific antigen levels of 10 ng/ml or less. Materials and Methods: One-hundred and eighty one men with PSA levels of 10 ng/ml or less, who had a TRUS-guided tissue biopsy performed, were included in this study. The detection rate of prostate cancer was compared according to the TRUS result and the presence or absence of nodularity and the consistency of the prostate on DRE. Results: In a total 181 patients, there were 73 patients with PSA levels of 4 ng/ml or less and 4 of them had prostate cancer. Thre were 108 patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml and 18 of them were prostate cancer. TRUS was performed in 152 patients and 16 out of 58 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, 3 out of 39 diagnosed with suspicious prostate cancer, and 2 out of 55 patients diagnosed as having no prostate cancer were found to have prostate cancer. In 40 patients, a nodule was palpated on DRE and 8 of them were found to have prostate cancer. Five out of 19 patients with a stony hard consistency, 3 of 12 with a firm to hard consisency, 12 of 129 with a firm consistency, 0 of 13 with a soft to firm consistency, and 2 of 8 with a soft consistency were prostate cancer. In the prostate cancer patients, there were 4 patients with PSA levels of 4 ng/ml or less and all these patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer or suspicious prostate cancer on TRUS but the nodule was not palpated in all patients. Two were soft and 2 were firm consistency on DRE. Conclusion: In patients with serum PSA levels of 10 ng/ml or less, TRUS is a more useful supporting method than DRE and a more active application of TRUS may lead to an early diagnosis and pertinent treatment of prostate cancer.

관련 논문AI추천

혈청 전립선특이항원과 경직장초음파로 측정된 전립선 용적과의 상관관계김미영대한방사선과학회 · Journal of Radiological Science and Technology2010 · 제33권 제3호전립선암 진단을 위한 전립선 특이 항원 선별검사의 의의민권식, 손혜숙, 엄상화, 이종태, 장석창, 전진호대한임상건강증진학회 · Korean Journal of Health Promotion2004 · 제4권 제3호Visually Estimated MRI Targeted Prostate Biopsy Could Improve the Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with a PSA Level <10 ng/mL남종길, 박성우, 이동훈, 이상돈, 이승우, 이준우, 정문기, 한지연연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2016 · 제57권 제3호Prostate-Specific Antigen, Digital Rectal Examination, and Transrectal Ultrasonography: A Meta-Analysis for This Diagnostic Triad of Prostate Cancer in Symptomatic Korean Men김춘배, 송재만, 정현철, Robert L.Kane연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2005 · 제46권 제3호Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?이동훈, 이승환, 정문수, 정병하연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2013 · 제54권 제4호Is Prostate-Specific Antigen Effective for Population Screening of Prostate Cancer? A Systematic Review김수영, 박지은, 이상무, 이유경, 이윤재, 전병열대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2013 · 제33권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)