Quantitative evaluation of upper extremity strength recovery after cervical epidural block: a retrospective study
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of cervical epidural block (CEB) in enhancing upper extremity (UE) muscle strength in patients with cervical disc herniation (CDH).Methods: Ten patients with CDH underwent a single CEB session. Follow-up assessments were conducted weekly for 2 weeks through outpatient visits. Handgrip strength on the affected side (AHGS) and the interlateral difference in handgrip strength (DHGS) between the affected and unaffected sides were measured using a dynamometer before, immediately after, 1 and 2 weeks after CEB. Neck pain and radiating UE pain were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline and 2 weeks posttreatment.Results: The median patient age was 46.4 years (range, 35–78 years). The affected disc levels were C5–6 in five patients, C6–7 in three, and C5–6–7 in two. The left side was affected in six patients and the right in four. The mean VAS score for neck pain decreased from 7.2 to 2.9, whereas that for radiating UE pain decreased from 6.3 to 2.8 after treatment. Both the AHGS and DHGS improved significantly compared to the baseline values at all posttreatment times. However, no significant differences were observed among the posttreatment time points. These findings remained consistent even after adjusting for age and sex.Conclusion: CEB may offer therapeutic benefits by alleviating pain and improving UE muscle weakness in patients with CDH. However, further large-scale prospective studies are required to validate these preliminary results and determine the long-term efficacy of CEB in managing CDH.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of cervical epidural block (CEB) in enhancing upper extremity (UE) muscle strength in patients with cervical disc herniation (CDH).Methods: Ten patients with CDH underwent a single CEB session. Follow-up assessments were conducted weekly for 2 weeks through outpatient visits. Handgrip strength on the affected side (AHGS) and the interlateral difference in handgrip strength (DHGS) between the affected and unaffected sides were measured using a dynamometer before, immediately after, 1 and 2 weeks after CEB. Neck pain and radiating UE pain were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline and 2 weeks posttreatment.Results: The median patient age was 46.4 years (range, 35–78 years). The affected disc levels were C5–6 in five patients, C6–7 in three, and C5–6–7 in two. The left side was affected in six patients and the right in four. The mean VAS score for neck pain decreased from 7.2 to 2.9, whereas that for radiating UE pain decreased from 6.3 to 2.8 after treatment. Both the AHGS and DHGS improved significantly compared to the baseline values at all posttreatment times. However, no significant differences were observed among the posttreatment time points. These findings remained consistent even after adjusting for age and sex.Conclusion: CEB may offer therapeutic benefits by alleviating pain and improving UE muscle weakness in patients with CDH. However, further large-scale prospective studies are required to validate these preliminary results and determine the long-term efficacy of CEB in managing CDH.
