Effect of Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection: Analysis According to the Neck Pain Patterns and MRI Findings
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: It is widely accepted that cervical interlaminar steroid injection (CIESI) is more effective in treating radicular pain than axial neck pain, but without direct comparison. And the differences of effect after CIESI according to MRI findings are inconsistent. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the therapeutic response of CIESI according to pain sites, durations, MRI findings, and other predictive factors altogether, unlike previous studies, which evaluated them separately. Methods: The medical records of 128 patients who received fluoroscopy guided CIESI were analyzed. We evaluated the therapeutic response (more than a 50% reduction on the visual analog scale [VAS] by their second visit) after CIESI by (1) pain site; neck pain without radicular pain/radicular pain with or without neck pain, (2) pain duration; acute/chronic (more than 6 month), and (3) findings of MRI; herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD)/spinal stenosis, respectively and altogether.Results: Eighty-eight patients (68%) responded to CIESI, and there were no significant differences in demographic data, initial VAS score, or laboratory findings. And there were no significant differences in the response rate relating to pain site, pain duration, or MRI findings, respectively. In additional analysis, acute radicular pain with HIVD patients showed significantly better response than chronic neck pain with spinal stenosis (P = 0.04). Conclusions: We cannot find any sole predictive factor of therapeutic response to the CIESI. But the patients having acute radicular pain with HIVD showed the best response, and those having other chronic neck pain showed the worst response to CIESI. (Korean J Pain 2016; 29: 96-102)
Abstract
Background: It is widely accepted that cervical interlaminar steroid injection (CIESI) is more effective in treating radicular pain than axial neck pain, but without direct comparison. And the differences of effect after CIESI according to MRI findings are inconsistent. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the therapeutic response of CIESI according to pain sites, durations, MRI findings, and other predictive factors altogether, unlike previous studies, which evaluated them separately. Methods: The medical records of 128 patients who received fluoroscopy guided CIESI were analyzed. We evaluated the therapeutic response (more than a 50% reduction on the visual analog scale [VAS] by their second visit) after CIESI by (1) pain site; neck pain without radicular pain/radicular pain with or without neck pain, (2) pain duration; acute/chronic (more than 6 month), and (3) findings of MRI; herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD)/spinal stenosis, respectively and altogether.Results: Eighty-eight patients (68%) responded to CIESI, and there were no significant differences in demographic data, initial VAS score, or laboratory findings. And there were no significant differences in the response rate relating to pain site, pain duration, or MRI findings, respectively. In additional analysis, acute radicular pain with HIVD patients showed significantly better response than chronic neck pain with spinal stenosis (P = 0.04). Conclusions: We cannot find any sole predictive factor of therapeutic response to the CIESI. But the patients having acute radicular pain with HIVD showed the best response, and those having other chronic neck pain showed the worst response to CIESI. (Korean J Pain 2016; 29: 96-102)
참고문헌 (26)
- Rowlingson JC, "Epidural analgesic techniques in the management of cervical pain", Anesth Analg, 65, pp.938~942 (1986)
- Manchikanti L, "An update of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in chronic spinal pain. Part II: guidance and recommendations", Pain Physician, 16(2 Suppl), pp.S49~S283 (2013)
- Diwan S, "Effectiveness of cervical epidural injections in the management of chronic neck and upper extremity pain", Pain Physician, 15, pp.E405~E434 (2012)
- Manchikanti L, "Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain", Pain Physician, 12, pp.699~802 (2009)
- Benzon HT, "The long journey of epidural steroid injections", Reg Anesth Pain Med, 38, pp.171~172 (2013)
- Manchikanti L, "Role of neuraxial steroids in interventional pain management", Pain Physician, 5, pp.182~199 (2002)
- Huston CW, "Cervical epidural steroid injections in the management of cervical radiculitis: interlaminar versus transforaminal. A review", Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2, pp.30~42 (2009)
- Stout A, "Epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy", Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 22, pp.149~159 (2011)
- Benyamin RM, "Systematic review of the effectiveness of cervical epidurals in the management of chronic neck pain", Pain Physician, 12, pp.137~157 (2009)
- Cohen SP, "Epidural steroids: a comprehensive, evidence-based review", Reg Anesth Pain Med, 38, pp.175~200 (2013)
- Ferrante FM, "Clinical classification as a predictor of therapeutic outcome after cervical epidural steroid injection", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 18, pp.730~736 (1993)
- Stav A, "Cervical epidural steroid injection for cervicobrachialgia", Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 37, pp.562~566 (1993)
- Catchlove RF, "The use of cervical epidural nerve blocks in the management of chronic head and neck pain", Can Anaesth Soc J, 31, pp.188~191 (1984)
- Saal JS, "Nonoperative management of herniated cervical intervertebral disc with radiculopathy", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 21, pp.1877~1883 (1996)
- Lee SH, "Clinical outcomes of cervical radiculopathy following epidural steroid injection : a prospective study with follow-up for more than 2 years", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 37, pp.1041~1047 (2012)
- Kwon JW, "Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection for neck pain and cervical radiculopathy : effect and prognostic factors", Skeletal Radiol, 36, pp.431~436 (2007)
- Shakir A, "Prediction of therapeutic response to cervical epidural steroid injection according to distribution of radicular pain", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 90, pp.917~922 (2011)
- Fish DE, "MRI prediction of therapeutic response to epidural steroid injection in patients with cervical radiculopathy", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 88, pp.239~246 (2009)
- Annaswamy TM, "Role of electrodiagnosis in patients being considered for epidural steroid injections", PM R, 5(5 Suppl), pp.S96~S99 (2013)
- Ackerman WE 3rd, "Serum hs-CRP as a useful marker for predicting the efficacy of lumbar epidural steroid injections on pain relief in patients with lumbar disc herniations", J Ky Med Assoc, 104, pp.295~299 (2006)
- Borghouts JA, "The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain : a systematic review", Pain, 77, pp.1~13 (1998)
- Manchikanti L, "Two-year follow-up results of fluoroscopic cervical epidural injections in chronic axial or discogenic neck pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial", Int J Med Sci, 11, pp.309~320 (2014)
- Kim KT, "Radiologic finding of patients with neck pain", J Korean Pain Soc, 9, pp.102~104 (1996)
- 박찬홍, "Investigation of High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate in Low Back Pain Patients", The Korean Journal of Pain, 23(2), pp.147~150 (2010), 대한통증학회
- Dworkin RH, "Interventional management of neuropathic pain : NeuPSIG recommendations", Pain, 154, pp.2249~2261 (2013)
- 신화용, "한국보건의료연구원의 보고서에 대한 반박을 기반으로 한 척추 질환에서 경막외 스테로이드 주사의 근거 고찰", Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 9(1), pp.9~18 (2014), 대한마취통증의학회