세계체제와 탈식민 - 본토 홍콩의 정치경제학
The World System and Beyond Colonialism: Political Economy of Locality Hong Kong
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
During my research about Hong Kong, I have been thinking about the value of the Hong Kong’s identity. The main purpose of the study was to research and conclude about Hong Kong’s identity and how important it is. I have also questioned about the legitimacy of Hong Kong’s identity within or outside the country. When you first arrive at Hong Kong International Airport, you will find a phrase that stated ‘Asia’s World City’ first. Geographically Hong Kong is located in Asia and for many, it is viewed as one of Asia’s main business hub, the ‘World City’ represents Hong Kong is a globalized and open city. As one of the main leading city in Asia during the era of globalization, Hong Kong with its slogan title of ‘Asia’s World City’ has always been proud of it, however internally it has been facing two major issues that may threaten its stability, the first being the laissez-faire capitalism which leads to the economic disparity gap between the rich and poor. The Second is the wide spread of Chinese nationalism propaganda that the Chinese colonizers have brought. In order to keep its locality, Hong Kong has to survive from the threats of both capitalism and colonialism. I have been observing Hong Kong as a capitalistic place from the world system perspective, and also imagining the process of Hong Kong’s beyond colonialism, nationalism and capitalism. When we recognize that the globalization is rapidly proceeding despite of its pros and cons, and we can understand that the formation of open market is ultimately inevitable, Hong Kong is currently on the way to be one. Many scholars have indicated that when both of localization and globalization develop in parallel, tension and competition would naturally emerge between them. Therefore, with the advent of globalization, we can easily assume that localization and nationalism are keeping each other in check. Obviously, the tension between globalism and localism is complex and multifaceted. Globalization identity and cultural identity are always competing with each other. Since Hong Kong is representing issues in the view of world system, this place holds a very important position. To be specific, Hong Kong shows that solving a problem of subalterns and missing citizens caused by colonialism and capitalism from advanced countries is a prerequisite for globalization. In my opinion, there is a ‘China– Hong Kong System’ which is similar to a substructure of the ‘World System’. When we take a clear look at the relationship between China and Hong Kong now, according to the words of Long Ying-tai about colonialism, it ignores the masses and does not focus on the long-term development that the British government has applied on before. After the transfer of its sovereignty from the United Kingdom to China in 1997, there have been conflicts between Main Land China and its semi-periphery ‘Hong Kong’ regarding Hong Kong’s identity without taking into account its local values and freedom. With great economic benefits as the forefront reason for change, China is trying hard to change and curb Hong Kong’s intrinsic values which were the core origins of the Island City.
Abstract
During my research about Hong Kong, I have been thinking about the value of the Hong Kong’s identity. The main purpose of the study was to research and conclude about Hong Kong’s identity and how important it is. I have also questioned about the legitimacy of Hong Kong’s identity within or outside the country. When you first arrive at Hong Kong International Airport, you will find a phrase that stated ‘Asia’s World City’ first. Geographically Hong Kong is located in Asia and for many, it is viewed as one of Asia’s main business hub, the ‘World City’ represents Hong Kong is a globalized and open city. As one of the main leading city in Asia during the era of globalization, Hong Kong with its slogan title of ‘Asia’s World City’ has always been proud of it, however internally it has been facing two major issues that may threaten its stability, the first being the laissez-faire capitalism which leads to the economic disparity gap between the rich and poor. The Second is the wide spread of Chinese nationalism propaganda that the Chinese colonizers have brought. In order to keep its locality, Hong Kong has to survive from the threats of both capitalism and colonialism. I have been observing Hong Kong as a capitalistic place from the world system perspective, and also imagining the process of Hong Kong’s beyond colonialism, nationalism and capitalism. When we recognize that the globalization is rapidly proceeding despite of its pros and cons, and we can understand that the formation of open market is ultimately inevitable, Hong Kong is currently on the way to be one. Many scholars have indicated that when both of localization and globalization develop in parallel, tension and competition would naturally emerge between them. Therefore, with the advent of globalization, we can easily assume that localization and nationalism are keeping each other in check. Obviously, the tension between globalism and localism is complex and multifaceted. Globalization identity and cultural identity are always competing with each other. Since Hong Kong is representing issues in the view of world system, this place holds a very important position. To be specific, Hong Kong shows that solving a problem of subalterns and missing citizens caused by colonialism and capitalism from advanced countries is a prerequisite for globalization. In my opinion, there is a ‘China– Hong Kong System’ which is similar to a substructure of the ‘World System’. When we take a clear look at the relationship between China and Hong Kong now, according to the words of Long Ying-tai about colonialism, it ignores the masses and does not focus on the long-term development that the British government has applied on before. After the transfer of its sovereignty from the United Kingdom to China in 1997, there have been conflicts between Main Land China and its semi-periphery ‘Hong Kong’ regarding Hong Kong’s identity without taking into account its local values and freedom. With great economic benefits as the forefront reason for change, China is trying hard to change and curb Hong Kong’s intrinsic values which were the core origins of the Island City.
참고문헌 (40)
- 박경화, "탈식민주의 ― 이론과 쟁점" (2003), 문학과 지성사
- 토마 피케티, "피케티의 신자본론" (2015), 글항아리
- 이매뉴얼 월러스틴, "자본주의는 미래가 있는가" (2014), 창비
- 자본주의 문명, "역사적 자본주의", pp.2014, 이매뉴얼 월러스틴
- 이매뉴얼 월러스틴, "유럽적 보편주의" (2008), 창비
- 이매뉴얼 월러스틴, "근대세계체제. 3 자본주의 세계경제의 거대한 팽창의 두 번째 시대 1730-1840년대" (2013), 까치
- 가라타니 고진, "세계사의 구조" (2012), 도서출판b
- 가라타니 고진, "세계공화국으로" (2007), 도서출판b
- 아르준 아파두라이, "고삐 풀린 현대성" (2004), 현실문화연구
- 데이비드 허다트, "호미 바바의 탈식민적 정체성" (2011), 앨피
- E. F. 슈마허, "작은 것이 아름답다 ― 인간 중심의 경제를 위하여" (2014), 문예출판사
- 빠르타 짯떼르지, "민족주의 사상과 식민지 세계(Nationalist Thought and Colonial World)" (2013), 그린비
- 고부응, "탈식민주의 ― 이론과 쟁점" (2003), 문학과 지성사
- 데이비드 허다트, "호미 바바의 탈식민적 정체성" (2011), 앨피
- 류영하, "중국 민족주의와 홍콩 본토주의 ― 홍콩역사박물관을 중심으로" (2014), 산지니
- 유영하, "홍콩이라는 문화공간" (2008), 아름나무
- 쉬진위, "양안은 화해할 수 있을까? - ‘중국몽(中國夢)’과 대만 발전의 갈등과 대화", 역사비평, (114), pp.165~190 (2016), 역사문제연구소
- 김만권, "‘샌더스’와 ‘코빈’ 신드롬 ― 지구화시대의 불평등과 제도권을 통한 풀뿌리 저항", 역사비평, (114), pp.137~164 (2016), 역사문제연구소
- 陳方正, "香港往何處去? 一 個香港中國人看佔中", 二十一世紀 (2015)
- 張健, "香港社會政治覺醒的動因: 階級關係、參政需求、族群認同", 二十一世紀 (2015)
- 朱耀偉, "香港(研究)作為方法 - 關於「香港論述」的可能性", 二十一世紀 (2015)
- 嚴飛, "香港的新貧階層及其制度性根源 ― 評Leo F. Goodstadt, Poverty in the Midst of Affluence: How Hong Kong MismanagedIts Prosperity", 二十一世紀 (2015)
- 丁偉, "香港人的卑微要求", 明報月刊 (2015)
- 許驥, "融入, 排斥, 抗拒 ― 立體的身分認同", 明報月刊 (2014)
- 劉銳紹, "‘高度自治’失蹤的背後", 明報月刊 (2014)
- 劉銳紹, "‘香港白皮書’與近期政局", 明報月刊 (2014)
- 章立凡, "普選: 歷史承諾與政黨信用", 明報月刊 (2014)
- 陳婉容, "六四, 本土, 學生組織", 明報月刊 (2015)
- 徐承恩, "本土論述 2013-2014 中國因素: 本土意識與公民社會" (2015), 漫游者文化事業股分有限公司
- 孔誥烽, "思想 26 ― 香港:本土與左右" (2014), 聯經
- 梁恩榮, "公民教育 ― 香港再造" (2011), 香港基督徒學會ㆍ印象文字 聯合出版
- 龍應台, "龍應台的香港筆記" (2015), 天地圖書
- 張炳良, "香港 生活 文化" (2011), Oxford
- 羅永生, "誰的城市 ― 戰後香港的公民文化與政治論述" (1997), Oxford
- 呂大樂, "香港 生活 文化" (2011), Oxford
- 戚本盛, "國民敎育是甚麽 ― 演變與爭議" (2012), 進一步多媒體有限公司
- 梁恩榮, "公民教育 ― 香港再造" (2011), 香港基督徒學會ㆍ印象文字 聯合出版
- 葉蔭聰, "誰的城市-戰後香港的公民文化與政治論述" (1997), Oxford
- 余諫之, "敎育線眼", 明報, A25~ (2015)
- Stephen Wing Kai Chiu, "The Dynamics of Social Movement in Hong Kong" (2000), Hong Kong Univ. Press
