‘정치적 내권화’의 징후인가, ‘급진적 정치’의 가능성인가?— 왕후이의 ‘인민전쟁’ 개념에 대한 비판적 고찰
Is It the Symptom of Political Involution or the Possibility of Radical Politics?
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to critically read Wang Hui’s thoughts on the re-politicalization of China through the concept of ‘people's war(人民戰爭)' proposed by Wang Hui. First of all, Wang Hui develops a discussion focusing on the depoliticized workers of today. According to him, today’s workers do not imagine any kind of new political power in spite of capitalist oppression. Wang Hui emphasizes the need for workers’ repoliticization in order to overcome the capitalist contradictions facing China today. His discussion can be read as an argument that emphasizes the power of the ‘people’. However, if we take a closer look at Wang Hui’s argument, he is ultimately responding to today’s contradictions by restoring the “popular line” that the CCP had practiced in the past. But it remains to be seen more critically whether returning to the experience of the Chinese Communist Party is truly a possibility of radical politics. Therefore, this thesis will reveal the theoretical flaws existing in Wang Hui’s argument by critically analyzing it.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to critically read Wang Hui’s thoughts on the re-politicalization of China through the concept of ‘people's war(人民戰爭)' proposed by Wang Hui. First of all, Wang Hui develops a discussion focusing on the depoliticized workers of today. According to him, today’s workers do not imagine any kind of new political power in spite of capitalist oppression. Wang Hui emphasizes the need for workers’ repoliticization in order to overcome the capitalist contradictions facing China today. His discussion can be read as an argument that emphasizes the power of the ‘people’. However, if we take a closer look at Wang Hui’s argument, he is ultimately responding to today’s contradictions by restoring the “popular line” that the CCP had practiced in the past. But it remains to be seen more critically whether returning to the experience of the Chinese Communist Party is truly a possibility of radical politics. Therefore, this thesis will reveal the theoretical flaws existing in Wang Hui’s argument by critically analyzing it.
참고문헌 (20)
- 가지타니 가이, "행복한 감시 국가, 중국" (2021), 눌와
- 미셸 푸코, "성의 역사 1" (2009), 나남
- 미셸 푸코, "안전, 영토, 인구" (2011), 난장
- 샹탈 무페, "정치적인 것의 귀환" (2012), 후마니타스
- 소피아 로젠펠드, "상식은 어쩌다 포퓰리즘이 되었는가" (2021), 부글북스
- 슬라보예 지젝, "공산주의라는 이념" (2021), 그린비
- 아리스토텔레스, "정치학" (2017), 숲
- 알랭 바디우, "공산주의라는 이념" (2021), 그린비
- 야스차 뭉크, "위험한 민주주의" (2018), 와이즈베리
- 이매뉴얼 윌러스틴, "윌러스틴의 세계체제 분석" (2005), 당대
- 왕후이, "단기 20세기" (2021), 글항아리
- 장 폴 사르트르, "지식인을 위한 변명" (2007), 이학사
- 조르조 아감벤, "호모 사케르" (2008), 새물결
- 프랜시스 후쿠야마, "정치 질서의 기원" (2012), 웅진지식하우스
- 한나 아렌트, "혁명론" (2020), 한길사
- 홍명교, "사라진 나의 중국 친구에게" (2021), 빨간소금
- 毛澤東文獻資料硏究會編集, "毛澤東集5" (1983), 蒼蒼社
- Esposito, Roberto, "Communitas" (2010), Stanford University Press
- Matei Calinescu, "Five Faces of Modernity" (1987), Duke University Press
- Tang, Wenfang, "Populist Authoritarianism" (2016), Oxford University Press
