본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

소아 인공와우이식 환자에서의 전기 자극 복합 활동 전위의 역치와 말소리 지각력과의 관계

The Relationship between Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Speech Perception in Children with Cochlear Implants

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류이비인후과학

초록

Background and Objectives Neuropathology around the cochlea could create variation from site to site in physiological thresholds of cochlear implant users. This variability would be detrimental to speech recognition with a cochlear implant for a variety of reasons, including distortion of the place code and variation in the number of neurons. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between thresholds of electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and speech perception in children implanted with the Nucleus Freedom devices. Subjects and Method Fifty-seven children implanted with the Nucleus Freedom device participated in this study. ECAP thresholds were recorded using the automated neural response telemetry test protocol. We then calculated mean threshold and three metrics to assess across-site variation within subjects: 1) the variance of T levels for all tested sites, 2) the range of T levels (highest minus lowest) across all tested sites and 3) site-to-site variation. For each subject, these measures were compared with performance on tests of word recognition. Results There was considerable across-site (within-subject) and across-subject variability in thresholds. However, we found no significant correlation between speech recognition and across-site variation of thresholds as well as mean threshold levels. Conclusion These data suggest that the ECAP measures of thresholds may not be an accurate predictor of speech perception ability.

Abstract

Background and Objectives Neuropathology around the cochlea could create variation from site to site in physiological thresholds of cochlear implant users. This variability would be detrimental to speech recognition with a cochlear implant for a variety of reasons, including distortion of the place code and variation in the number of neurons. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between thresholds of electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and speech perception in children implanted with the Nucleus Freedom devices. Subjects and Method Fifty-seven children implanted with the Nucleus Freedom device participated in this study. ECAP thresholds were recorded using the automated neural response telemetry test protocol. We then calculated mean threshold and three metrics to assess across-site variation within subjects: 1) the variance of T levels for all tested sites, 2) the range of T levels (highest minus lowest) across all tested sites and 3) site-to-site variation. For each subject, these measures were compared with performance on tests of word recognition. Results There was considerable across-site (within-subject) and across-subject variability in thresholds. However, we found no significant correlation between speech recognition and across-site variation of thresholds as well as mean threshold levels. Conclusion These data suggest that the ECAP measures of thresholds may not be an accurate predictor of speech perception ability.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Blamey P, "Factors affecting auditory performance of postlingually deaf adults using cochlear implants", Audiol Neurootol, 1(5), pp.293~306 (1996)
  2. Kawano A, "Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation", Acta Otolaryngol, 118(3), pp.313~326 (1998)
  3. Kileny PR, "Effects of preoperative electrical stimulability and historical factors on performance with multichannel cochlear implant", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 100(7), pp.563~568 (1991)
  4. Otte J, "Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae. Implications for cochlear implantation", Laryngoscope, 88(8 Pt 1), pp.1231~1246 (1978)
  5. Nadol JB Jr, "Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss:implications for cochlear implantation", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 98(6), pp.411~416 (1989)
  6. Smith L, "Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 92(1 Pt 1), pp.19~23 (1983)
  7. Pfingst BE, "Relation of psychophysical data to histopathology in monkeys with cochlear implants", Acta Otolaryngol, 92(1), pp.1~13 (1981)
  8. Abbas PJ, "Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response:growth of response with current level", Hear Res, 51(1), pp.123~137 (1991)
  9. Brown CJ, "Longitudinal assessment of physiological and psychophysical measures in cochlear implant users", Ear Hear, 16(5), pp.439~449 (1995)
  10. Pfingst BE, "Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants", J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 5(1), pp.11~24 (2004)
  11. Pfingst BE, "Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants:relation to speech recognition", Audiol Neurootol, 9(6), pp.341~352 (2004)
  12. Muhaimeed HA, "Correlation between NRT measurement level and behavioral levels in pediatrics cochlear implant patients", Int J Pediatr Otolaryngol, 74(4), pp.356~60 (2010)
  13. Mason SM, "Intraoperative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant", Br J Audiol, 35(4), pp.225~235 (2001)
  14. Seyle K, "Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures", Ear Hear, 23(1 Suppl), pp.72S~79S (2002)
  15. 이미영, "학령 전 아동의 단음절 말지각 검사 개발", 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학, 52(4), pp.312~321 (2009), 대한이비인후과학회
  16. Clay KM, "Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential(ECAP)recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users", Ear Hear, 28(6), pp.850~861 (2007)
  17. Hughes ML, "The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients", J Acoust Soc Am, 119(3), pp.1527~1537 (2006)
  18. 김재룡, "The Relationship Between Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Speech Perception: A Study in Cochlear Implant Users With Short Electrode Array", OTOLOGY NEUROTOLOGY, 31(7), pp.1041~1048
  19. Kim LS, "The usefulness of the electrophysiologic measures in cochlear implantation", Presented at 5th Asia Pacific Symposium on Cochlear Implant and Related Sciences, Hong Kong (2005)
  20. van Dijk B, "Clinical results of AutoNRT,a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants", Ear Hear, 28(4), pp.558~570 (2007)
  21. Botros A, "Neural response telemetry reconsidered:I.The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting", Ear Hear, 31(3), pp.367~379 (2010)
  22. Cosetti MK, "Intraoperative neural response telemetry as a predictor of performance", Otol Neurotol, 31(7), pp.1095~1099 (2010)
  23. Smoorenburg GF, "Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds", Audiol Neurootol, 7(6), pp.335~347 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)