본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 Central Institute for the Deaf 문장과 한국어 Hearing in Noise Test 문장의 비교 분석

Comparison Analysis between Korean Central Institute for the Deaf Sentence and Korean Hearing in Noise Test Sentence

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류이비인후과학

초록

Background and Objectives Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentences and Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) sentences are tools that are used for assessing speech cognition. The Korean versions of HINT and CID, KHINT and KCID, have been made and used for the selection of cochlear implant candidates. In this study, we analyzed the compatibility of sentences of KCID and KHINT as testing material for assessing speech performance. Materials and methods A total of 36 patients selected for the study were divided into 2 groups. Group A, whose mean age was 49.9 years, was composed of 18 patients with hearing aid (range, 24 to 68 years); Group B, whose mean age was 23.5 years, was composed of 18 patients with cochlear implant (range, 10 to 63 years). Open set recognition scores of 2 sentences were compared in each group, by randomly selecting one list each of the KCID and KHINT sentences. Sentences were stimulated using recorded voice and live voice for Group A and B, respectively. Results There were no statistically significant differences between mean scores of KCID and KHINT sentences in each group (p=0.289, 0.208), respectively. However, there were statistically significant linear correlations between KCID and KHINT sentences in each group and total group (R2=0.961, 0.945, 0.923, respectively; p<0.01, <0.01, <0.01, respectively). Conclusion KCID sentences can be used as a speech performance test material and might serve as a compatible test material for selection of the cochlear implant candidacy.

Abstract

Background and Objectives Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentences and Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) sentences are tools that are used for assessing speech cognition. The Korean versions of HINT and CID, KHINT and KCID, have been made and used for the selection of cochlear implant candidates. In this study, we analyzed the compatibility of sentences of KCID and KHINT as testing material for assessing speech performance. Materials and methods A total of 36 patients selected for the study were divided into 2 groups. Group A, whose mean age was 49.9 years, was composed of 18 patients with hearing aid (range, 24 to 68 years); Group B, whose mean age was 23.5 years, was composed of 18 patients with cochlear implant (range, 10 to 63 years). Open set recognition scores of 2 sentences were compared in each group, by randomly selecting one list each of the KCID and KHINT sentences. Sentences were stimulated using recorded voice and live voice for Group A and B, respectively. Results There were no statistically significant differences between mean scores of KCID and KHINT sentences in each group (p=0.289, 0.208), respectively. However, there were statistically significant linear correlations between KCID and KHINT sentences in each group and total group (R2=0.961, 0.945, 0.923, respectively; p<0.01, <0.01, <0.01, respectively). Conclusion KCID sentences can be used as a speech performance test material and might serve as a compatible test material for selection of the cochlear implant candidacy.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. Nilsson M, "Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise", J Acoust Soc Am, 95(2), pp.1085~1099 (1994)
  2. Soli SD, "Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the Hearing in Noise Test", Int J Audiol, 47(6), pp.356~361 (2008)
  3. 문성균, "한국어 Hearing in Noise Test(HINT) 문장의 개발", 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학, 48(6), pp.724~728 (2005), 대한이비인후과학회
  4. Hood RB, "Physical characteristics of speech rhythm of deaf and normal hearing speakers", J Commun Disord, 2(1), pp.20~28 (1969)
  5. Davis H, "Hearing and deafness. 4th ed", pp.537~538 (1978), Holt, Rinehart & Winston
  6. Healy EW, "Consistency of sentence intelligibility across difficult listening situations", J Speech Lang Hear Res, 49(4), pp.823~834 (2006)
  7. Silverman SR, "Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 64(4), pp.1234~1244 (1955)
  8. Harris JD, "The relation between speech intelligibility and electroacoustic characteristics of low fidelity circuitry", J Aud Res, 1, pp.357~381 (1961)
  9. Rippy JV, "List equivalency of the CID everyday sentences (Harris revision) under three signal-to-noise ratios", Ear Hear, 4(5), pp.251~254 (1983)
  10. Häallgren M, "A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition", Int J Audiol, 45(4), pp.227~237 (2006)
  11. Shiroma M, "The Japanese hearing in noise test", Int J Audiol, 47(6), pp.381~382 (2008)
  12. Wong LL, "Development of the Cantonese Hearing In Noise Test (CHINT)", Ear Hear, 26(3), pp.276~289 (2005)
  13. Wong LL, "Development of the Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test (MHINT)", Ear Hear, 28(2 Suppl), pp.70S~74S (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)