한국표준 일반용 문장표를 사용한 문장인지도의 검사-재검사 신뢰도
Test-Retest Reliability of Sentence Recognition Score Using Korean Standard Sentence Lists for Adults (KS-SL-A)
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this study was to demonstrate the test-retest reliability of sentence recognition score (SRS) using Korean standard sentence lists for adults (KS-SL-A). Subjects consisted of 156 adults aged between 18 and 25 years with normal hearing sensitivity. Eight lists of KS-SL-A were presented to each subject using a compact disc. SRS was calculated by the percentage of correct responses of 40 target words within 10 sentences. After one or two weeks, retest was performed and correlation, paired t-test, 95% confidence interval (CI) and prediction interval (PI) were calculated for the test-retest reliability. Results showed that the correlation coefficient of SRS was 0.72 and the difference between test and retest SRSs was not statistically significant (paired t-test, p > .05). Results also demonstrated narrow 95% CI and relatively wide 95% PIs. These results indicate that SRS test using the recorded voice of KS-SL-A is fairly reliable. Therefore, 95% PIs for each SRS rather than the PI for the whole range of SRS are strongly recommended in clinical situations when evaluating each individual's retest SRS.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to demonstrate the test-retest reliability of sentence recognition score (SRS) using Korean standard sentence lists for adults (KS-SL-A). Subjects consisted of 156 adults aged between 18 and 25 years with normal hearing sensitivity. Eight lists of KS-SL-A were presented to each subject using a compact disc. SRS was calculated by the percentage of correct responses of 40 target words within 10 sentences. After one or two weeks, retest was performed and correlation, paired t-test, 95% confidence interval (CI) and prediction interval (PI) were calculated for the test-retest reliability. Results showed that the correlation coefficient of SRS was 0.72 and the difference between test and retest SRSs was not statistically significant (paired t-test, p > .05). Results also demonstrated narrow 95% CI and relatively wide 95% PIs. These results indicate that SRS test using the recorded voice of KS-SL-A is fairly reliable. Therefore, 95% PIs for each SRS rather than the PI for the whole range of SRS are strongly recommended in clinical situations when evaluating each individual's retest SRS.
참고문헌 (16)
- 국립특수교육원, "특수교육학 용어사전" (2009), 하우
- 김순래, "골전도 청성지속반응 검사 재검사 신뢰도", Audiology and Speech Research, 6(1), pp.50~54 (2010), 한국청각언어재활학회
- 유병민, "한국 표준 일반용 단음절어표(KS-MWL-A)를 사용한 단어인지도의 예측 구간", Audiology and Speech Research, 10(1), pp.35~42 (2014), 한국청각언어재활학회
- 이정학, "어음청각검사-전문가 지침서" (2010), 학지사
- 어음청각검사용 한국어 기준음압의 개발에 관한 연구보고서, "이정학", 산업통상자원부, 100~110 (2013)
- 이혜원, "학령전기용 어음청각검사 어표의 검사-재검사 신뢰도", Audiology and Speech Research, 10(1), pp.25~34 (2014), 한국청각언어재활학회
- 장현숙, "문장인지검사를 위한 한국표준 문장표 개발", 청능재활, 4(2), pp.161~177 (2008)
- 한우재, "한국어 어음청각검사의 개발과 표준화에 대한 고찰", Audiology and Speech Research, 9(2), pp.113~126 (2013), 한국청각언어재활학회
- D'haenens, W., "Auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing adults : A test-retest reliability study", International Journal of Audiology, 47, pp.489~498 (2008)
- Grange, M. E., "Test-retest reliability in word recognition testing in subjects with varying levels of hearing loss", 석사, Department of Communication Disorders, pp.2013
- Hong, S. A., "Test-retest reliability of speech discrimination test using the monosyllabic word lists", Korean Journal of Audiology, 6(2), pp.128~135 (2002)
- Hopkins W. G., "Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science", Sports Medicine, 30(1), pp.1~15 (2000)
- ISO, "Acoustics-Audiometric test methods-Part 3: Speech audiometry", International Standard Organization, ~ (2012)
- KS, "Acoustics–Audiometric test methods–Part 3: Speech audiometry", Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, ~ (2009)
- Thornton, A. R., "Speech discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21(3), pp.507~518 (1978)