본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동시 및 순차적 양측 인공와우 이식술의 시간 및 비용 비교

Comparison of Time and Cost between Sequential and Simultaneous Bilateral Cochlear Implants

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류이비인후과학

초록

Background and Objectives Purpose of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness between sequential (SeqBCI) and simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantations (SimBCI). Subjects and Method This is a retrospective study of 15 patients who underwent bilateral cochlear implantations at a tertiary care facility. Nine patients with SimBCI and six with SeqBCI were included. Operation time, anesthesia time, expenses for preoperative evaluation, hospitalization time, hospital expenses and postoperative expenses were investigated. Results The 1st, 2nd and cumulative operation time for the SeqBCI group were 181, 120 and 301 minutes, respectively, on the average. The 1st, 2nd and cumulative anesthesia time were 212, 162 and 373 minutes, respectively. The 1st, 2nd and cumulative expenses for preoperative evaluation were 1074754, 280118 and 1354872 won, respectively. The 1st, 2nd and total hospitalization time were 6.2, 4.2 and 10.4 days, respectively. The 1st, 2nd and cumulative hospital expenses were 24082713, 24158366 and 48176734 won, respectively. The 1st, 2nd and cumulative postoperative expenses were 447830, 551778 and 999608 won, respectively. For the SimBCI group, the operation time, anesthesia time, expenses for evaluation, hospitalization time, hospital expenses and postoperative expenses were 246, 280 minutes, 1396793 won, 6.2 days, 46073011 and 816121 won, respectively. On the whole, anesthesia time, hospitalization time and postoperative expenses of the SimBCI group were less than those of the SeqBCI group (p=0.01, 0.02 and 0.02, respectively). The postoperative expenses of SeqBCI were the highest during the first 4 months whereas those of SimBCI were less during the same period (p=0.03). Conclusion Cumulative anesthesia time, hospitalization time and postoperative cost of SimBCI were less than those of SeqBCI. Our results may be useful for counseling the timing of second CI.

Abstract

Background and Objectives Purpose of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness between sequential (SeqBCI) and simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantations (SimBCI). Subjects and Method This is a retrospective study of 15 patients who underwent bilateral cochlear implantations at a tertiary care facility. Nine patients with SimBCI and six with SeqBCI were included. Operation time, anesthesia time, expenses for preoperative evaluation, hospitalization time, hospital expenses and postoperative expenses were investigated. Results The 1st, 2nd and cumulative operation time for the SeqBCI group were 181, 120 and 301 minutes, respectively, on the average. The 1st, 2nd and cumulative anesthesia time were 212, 162 and 373 minutes, respectively. The 1st, 2nd and cumulative expenses for preoperative evaluation were 1074754, 280118 and 1354872 won, respectively. The 1st, 2nd and total hospitalization time were 6.2, 4.2 and 10.4 days, respectively. The 1st, 2nd and cumulative hospital expenses were 24082713, 24158366 and 48176734 won, respectively. The 1st, 2nd and cumulative postoperative expenses were 447830, 551778 and 999608 won, respectively. For the SimBCI group, the operation time, anesthesia time, expenses for evaluation, hospitalization time, hospital expenses and postoperative expenses were 246, 280 minutes, 1396793 won, 6.2 days, 46073011 and 816121 won, respectively. On the whole, anesthesia time, hospitalization time and postoperative expenses of the SimBCI group were less than those of the SeqBCI group (p=0.01, 0.02 and 0.02, respectively). The postoperative expenses of SeqBCI were the highest during the first 4 months whereas those of SimBCI were less during the same period (p=0.03). Conclusion Cumulative anesthesia time, hospitalization time and postoperative cost of SimBCI were less than those of SeqBCI. Our results may be useful for counseling the timing of second CI.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Peters BR, "Worldwide trends in bilateral cochlear implantation", Laryngoscope, 120(Suppl 2), pp.S17~S44 (2010)
  2. Basura GJ, "Bilateral cochlear implantation: current concepts, indications, and results", Laryngoscope, 119(12), pp.2395~2401 (2009)
  3. Steffens T, "The benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children", Acta Otolaryngol, 128(2), pp.164~176 (2008)
  4. Grieco-Calub TM, "Sound localization skills in children who use bilateral cochlear implants and in children with normal acoustic hearing", Ear Hear, 31(5), pp.645~656 (2010)
  5. Van Deun L, "Earlier intervention leads to better sound localization in children with bilateral cochlear implants", Audiol Neurootol, 15(1), pp.7~17 (2010)
  6. Scherf F, "Hearing benefits of second-side cochlear implantation in two groups of children", Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 71(12), pp.1855~1863 (2007)
  7. Zeitler DM, "Speech perception benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children and adults: a retrospective analysis", Otol Neurotol, 29(3), pp.314~325 (2008)
  8. Van Deun L, "Spatial speech perception benefits in young children with normal hearing and cochlear implants", Ear Hear, 31(5), pp.702~713 (2010)
  9. Litovsky RY, "Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and", or hearing aids in children, 2006, pp.45(Suppl 1), S78~S91
  10. Gordon KA, "Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants", Otol Neurotol, 30(3), pp.319~331 (2009)
  11. Gordon KA, "Auditory brainstem activity in children with 9-30 months of bilateral cochlear implant use", Hear Res, 233(1-2), pp.97~107 (2007)
  12. Grainger J, "Simultaneous cochlear implantation in children: the Great Ormond Street experience", Cochlear Implants Int, 13(3), pp.137~141 (2012)
  13. Ramsden JD, "Bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation in children: our first 50 cases", Laryngoscope, 119(12), pp.2444~2448 (2009)
  14. Anagiotos A, "The impact of blood loss during cochlear implantation in very young children", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 270(9), pp.2439~2444 (2013)
  15. Crathorne L, "A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bilateral multichannel cochlear implants in adults with severeto- profound hearing loss", Clin Otolaryngol, 37(5), pp.342~354 (2012)
  16. Lammers MJ, "The costutility of bilateral cochlear implantation: a systematic review", Laryngoscope, 121(12), pp.2604~2609 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

순차적 양측 인공와우 아동들의 일상생활에서의 기능적 듣기수행력김유정, 노지민, 박헌이, 이종주, 임혜진, 정연훈, 홍수아대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2015 · 제58권 제7호2차 이식연령이 순차적 양이 인공와우 이식 아동의 소음 하 단어인지도에 미치는 영향김지민, 이재희, 전영명한국청각언어재활학회 · Audiology and Speech Research2014 · 제10권 제2호생후 12개월 이전에 인공와우이식을 받은 선천성 농 아동의 말지각과 언어능력김리석, 부성현, 서지원, 정성욱대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2018 · 제61권 제12호Part 3. 국내 청각 재활 지침을 위한 난청 환자에서 이식형 청각기기 현황 및 문제점 분석 연구공태훈, 김지원, 박경호, 서영준, 서지영, 오수희, 윤철영, 이준헌, 이효정, 조완호, 진인기, 차동철, 최성준대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2025 · 제68권 제9호Educational Status in Bilateral Prelingual Deaf Children with Cochlear Implantation곽상현, 남기성, 배성훈, 최재영대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2019 · 제23권 제3호한국 성인에서의 Neuro OneⓇ System을 이용한 인공와우이식의 단기 임상결과김민범, 이용우, 장선오대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2018 · 제61권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)