開發信託 관련 租稅債權을 원인채권으로 하는 信託財産에 대한 押留
How to Seize Properties in Development Trust based on Tax Liability
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract According to the Trust Law, if creditors of beneficiary or trusters seized properties in trust, it would be illegal. Corporate tax, individual income tax, property tax, or acquisition tax is levied on beneficiaries or trusters for "Development Trust". As a result, tax authorities are not entitled to seize properties in trust. However, if there is a party who makes a contract with a trustee, he or she can have a credit to the latter following their contract. The former is entitled to seize the properties in trust directly. ''The Prerogative Right of Tax Authorities" can hardly survive in Development Trust. This thesis focused on whether tax liabilities could be imposed on trustees instead of beneficiaries or trusters for Development Trust. Corporate tax, individual income tax, or acquisition tax makes it impossible to impose tax liabilities on trustees, but "value added tax" does so. This thesis concludes that the possibility of levying on trustees should be open to "the Trust for Guarantee".
Abstract
Abstract According to the Trust Law, if creditors of beneficiary or trusters seized properties in trust, it would be illegal. Corporate tax, individual income tax, property tax, or acquisition tax is levied on beneficiaries or trusters for "Development Trust". As a result, tax authorities are not entitled to seize properties in trust. However, if there is a party who makes a contract with a trustee, he or she can have a credit to the latter following their contract. The former is entitled to seize the properties in trust directly. ''The Prerogative Right of Tax Authorities" can hardly survive in Development Trust. This thesis focused on whether tax liabilities could be imposed on trustees instead of beneficiaries or trusters for Development Trust. Corporate tax, individual income tax, or acquisition tax makes it impossible to impose tax liabilities on trustees, but "value added tax" does so. This thesis concludes that the possibility of levying on trustees should be open to "the Trust for Guarantee".
참고문헌 (12)
- 강인애, "주택조합의 신탁재산에 대한 납세의무자", 판례연구, 7 (1994)
- 김성균, "본질성이론의 관점에서 본 불확정개념의 효력 ―세법을 중심으로―", 조세법연구, 14(1), pp.99~135 (2008), 한국세법학회
- 김진우, "신탁재산의 특수성", 법조, 51(10) (2002)
- 김홍기, "김성균", 역외파생상품거래의 과세문제에 관한 연구, 2007, pp.26(2), 65~99[DOI]
- -보전처분,
- 백승재, "신탁재산의 관리ㆍ 처분시 부가가치세 납부의무자", 판례연구, 17 (2004)
- 이형하, "신탁법상의 신탁재산에 대한 종합토지세 부과대상자", 대법원판례해 설 제19호, ~ (1993)
- 임승순, "체납자 아닌 제3자 소유물건에 대한 압류처분의 효력", 판례월보, 276 (1993)
- 임채웅, "信託財産에 대한 民事執行의 硏究", 법조, 58(8), pp.91~143 (2009), 법조협회
- 조철호, "부동산신탁에 있어서 신탁부동산의 처분에 대한 부가가치세 납세의 무자", 재판자료, 108 (2005)
- 진상훈, "부동산신탁의 유형별 사해행위판단방법", 민사집행법연구, 4 (2008)
- 위탁자가 상속받은 재산을 신탁한 경우, 그 재산상속에 따라 위탁자 에게 부과된 상속세 채권이 신탁법 제21조 제1항 소정의 '신탁 전 의 원인으로 발생한 권리'에 해당하는지 여부, "한강현", 대법원판례해설, ~ (1997)