법인격부인의 본질에 대한 검토- 법인격투과론
An Examination of the Nature of the Disregarding the Corporate Entity Theory: A Penetration of the Corporate Entity Theory
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Traditionally, the disregarding of the corporate entity theory developed as a theory that disregarded the corporate entity and sought liability from third party entities hidden behind corporations, such as staff members, agencies or other corporations. Strictly, however, the disregarding of the corporate entity theory can be viewed as being concerned with whether liabilities can be extended to a third party when a corporation is found to be liable. In this regard, the concept “disregarding of the corporate entity theory” may be more appropriately called “penetration of the corporate entity theory.” This is because the theory recognizes a corporate entity while at the same time penetrates it and expands liability to actual subjects with responsibilities within the said corporation. However, in order to thus penetrate the corporate entity, which externally appears to be the agent, and seek liability from the actual subjects who are responsible, there has to be proper legal grounds. This article aims to examine relevant legal bases, such as theories concerning joint unlawful act liabilities, the abuse of agent’s authority, declaration of untrue intention, entity relations (beneficiary’s liability), concurrent assumption of liabilities, principle of good faith and abuse of rights, and then show that the basis of the penetration of the corporate entity theory should ultimately be found in the principle of self-responsibility.
Abstract
Traditionally, the disregarding of the corporate entity theory developed as a theory that disregarded the corporate entity and sought liability from third party entities hidden behind corporations, such as staff members, agencies or other corporations. Strictly, however, the disregarding of the corporate entity theory can be viewed as being concerned with whether liabilities can be extended to a third party when a corporation is found to be liable. In this regard, the concept “disregarding of the corporate entity theory” may be more appropriately called “penetration of the corporate entity theory.” This is because the theory recognizes a corporate entity while at the same time penetrates it and expands liability to actual subjects with responsibilities within the said corporation. However, in order to thus penetrate the corporate entity, which externally appears to be the agent, and seek liability from the actual subjects who are responsible, there has to be proper legal grounds. This article aims to examine relevant legal bases, such as theories concerning joint unlawful act liabilities, the abuse of agent’s authority, declaration of untrue intention, entity relations (beneficiary’s liability), concurrent assumption of liabilities, principle of good faith and abuse of rights, and then show that the basis of the penetration of the corporate entity theory should ultimately be found in the principle of self-responsibility.
참고문헌 (36)
- 孫珠瓚, "商法(上)" (2002), 박영사
- 오시영, "민법총칙(개정판)" (2011), 학현사
- 李哲松, "會社法講義(제9판)" (2001), 박영사
- 李哲松, "會社法講義(제8판)" (2000), 박영사
- 鄭東潤, "商法(上)" (2000), 법문사
- 林泓根, "會社法(개정판)" (2001), 법문사
- 崔基元, "新會社法論(제11개정판)" (2001), 박영사
- 최준선, "회사법(제5판)" (2007), 삼영사
- 법무부2009년민법개정위원회 3분과(법인)회의일지, "법무부", 법무부, ~ (2009)
- 姜渭斗, "法人格否認의 法理의 適用範圍와 適用要件", 判例月報, 223 (1989), 판례 월보사
- 高平錫, "法人格否認論의 否認, in 商事法의 現代的 課題(椿江 孫珠瓚博士華甲紀 念)" (1984), 박영사
- 김정호, "법인격부인론의 적용범위", 고려법학, 41 (2003), 고려대학교법학연구원
- 金驃鎭, "會社法人格否認의 法理", 法政(舊), 20(12)통권 : 186 (1965), 법정 사
- 송호영, "法人格否認論의 要件과 效果 - 대법원 2001. 1. 19. 선고, 97다21604 판결", 저스티스, 66 (2002), 한국법학원
- 李均成, "會社法人格否認의 法理", 考試界, 28(5) (1983)
- 李宙興, "法人格否認과 信義則違反", 司法行政, 360 (1990), 한국사법행정학회
- 林在淵, "法人格否認論: 美國의 理論과 判例를 중심으로", 法曺, 43(8)통권 : 455 (1994), 법조협회
- "판례연구", 2001, ~, pp.서울지방변호사회
- 鄭奇南, "會社法人格無視의 法理, in 現代法學의 諸間題(徐燉珏博士華甲紀念)" (1981), 법 문사
- 鄭東潤, "法人格否認理論의 適用要件과 根據", 법률신문, 1845 (1989), 법률신문사
- 鄭東潤, "法人格否認理論의 適用要件과 根據", 民事裁判의 諸問題, 6 (1991), 한국 사법행정학회
- 鄭鎭世, "會社形態의 濫用과 그 對策", 석사, pp.1967
- 鄭燦亨, "法人格否認論", 판례월보, 226 (1989), 판례월보사
- 鄭燦亨, "法人格否認論, in 現代民商法의 硏究(위정 이재철 박사 화갑기념논문집)" (1984), 법문사
- 蔡永洙, "法人格 否認의 法理", 대법원판례해설, 11 (1990), 법원도 서관
- 최준선, "法人格否認理論의 適用要件(上)", 법률신문, 1849 (1989), 법률신문사
- 최준선, "法人格否認理論의 適用要件(下)", 법률신문, 1850 (1989), 법률신문사
- 韓昌熙, "便宜置籍과 法人格否認", 判例月報, 239 (1989), 판례월보사
- 洪愼喜, "會社制度의 濫用과 法人格否認의 理論", 청주대 법학논고, 5 (1961), 청주대 학교
- Boujong, Karlheinz, "Das Trennungsprinzip des § 13 Abs. 2 GmbHG und seine Grenzen in der neueren Judikatur des Bundesgerichtshofes, in: Festschrift für Walter Odersky zum 65", pp.739~ (1996), Geburtstag
- Flume, Werner, "Die juristische Person, Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts", ~ (1983)
- Kuhn, Georg, "Haften die GmbH-Gesellschafter für Gesellschaftsschulden persönlich? In: Festschrift für Robert Fischer", 351~ (1979)
- Kübler, Friedrich, "Gesellschaftsrecht, 4" (1994)
- Müller-Freienfels, "Wolfram: Zur Lehre vom sogenannten "Durchgriff" bei juristischen Personen im Privatrecht", AcP, 156, pp.522~ (1957)
- Thomas Raiser, "Recht der Kapitalgesellschaften, 2" (1992)
- Karsten Schmidt, "Gesellschaftsrecht, 3 Aufl., Kö1n", Berlin, München 1997 Wüst, Günther: Wege des Gläubigerschutzes bei materieller Unterkapitalisierung einer GmbH, pp.DStR, 1991[DOI]