본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영화산업 종사자관련 계약상의 몇 가지 과제

Some Issues of the Contracts for Film Industry

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

A movie we enjoy is based on numerous contracts for its process such as manufacturing, advertising or promotion, presentation, and profit-sharing. A director, a screen writer, and so-called ‘film staff’ take part in the film production process though they do not make their appearance on the stage. The contract between a film manufacturer and the film staff is categorized into two types: ‘bucket contract' and ‘per work contract'. A ‘bucket contract’ means literally an agreement directly between a film manufacturer and the representative of all film staff in the apprenticeship system. In this case, the representative as a head of the team distributes contract profit or revenue sharing to the members of the team. However, in a ‘per work contract,' the manufacturer and the film staff promise to carry out their duties for completing film production. In this contract, other exclusive contract is signed between artists and the agency. The exclusive contract indicates that the artistic laborer offers his or her service exclusively to the provider and receives a remuneration as reward. The exclusive contract is a kind of non-typical contract. In general concept, the ‘bucket contract' and the ‘per work contract' are similar patterns of apprenticeship contract because the manufacturer and the film staff make an agreement to complete the film. However, the exclusive contract is a kind of service contract. So, whether it is a typical or non-typical contract is a problem. If it is a non-typical contract as a new trend, we should judge whether the regulations of typical contract are applied to the exclusive one with analogical interpretation. In this case, some problems are found such contract laws as revocation of a contract, prediction charge of damage, penalty for breach of contract, and ownership of a film. The problems of labor characteristics must be considered in the film industry. The contract of providing labors should not be judged only in two types: a typical or non-typical contract. The understanding of realistic dependent relationship between the contract participants should be decided in the first hand. Except for minor top celebrities, a number of employers participate in various employment fields of film industry. We should understand the characteristics and qualities of labor supply contract based on subordinate-dominant relationship. The present contract implies an application of ‘all or nothing’ principle. Therefore, the problems of workers should be studied whether or not they are really workers or employers under the situation. We need to make an effort to create more stable employment environment for film workers.

Abstract

A movie we enjoy is based on numerous contracts for its process such as manufacturing, advertising or promotion, presentation, and profit-sharing. A director, a screen writer, and so-called ‘film staff’ take part in the film production process though they do not make their appearance on the stage. The contract between a film manufacturer and the film staff is categorized into two types: ‘bucket contract' and ‘per work contract'. A ‘bucket contract’ means literally an agreement directly between a film manufacturer and the representative of all film staff in the apprenticeship system. In this case, the representative as a head of the team distributes contract profit or revenue sharing to the members of the team. However, in a ‘per work contract,' the manufacturer and the film staff promise to carry out their duties for completing film production. In this contract, other exclusive contract is signed between artists and the agency. The exclusive contract indicates that the artistic laborer offers his or her service exclusively to the provider and receives a remuneration as reward. The exclusive contract is a kind of non-typical contract. In general concept, the ‘bucket contract' and the ‘per work contract' are similar patterns of apprenticeship contract because the manufacturer and the film staff make an agreement to complete the film. However, the exclusive contract is a kind of service contract. So, whether it is a typical or non-typical contract is a problem. If it is a non-typical contract as a new trend, we should judge whether the regulations of typical contract are applied to the exclusive one with analogical interpretation. In this case, some problems are found such contract laws as revocation of a contract, prediction charge of damage, penalty for breach of contract, and ownership of a film. The problems of labor characteristics must be considered in the film industry. The contract of providing labors should not be judged only in two types: a typical or non-typical contract. The understanding of realistic dependent relationship between the contract participants should be decided in the first hand. Except for minor top celebrities, a number of employers participate in various employment fields of film industry. We should understand the characteristics and qualities of labor supply contract based on subordinate-dominant relationship. The present contract implies an application of ‘all or nothing’ principle. Therefore, the problems of workers should be studied whether or not they are really workers or employers under the situation. We need to make an effort to create more stable employment environment for film workers.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 강성태, "특수고용관계와 근로기준법상 근로자성의 판단", 노동법학, 11 (2000)
  2. 공정거래위원회, "연예인 권익과 연예산업 발전, 2마리 토끼를 잡는다", 소비 자정책국 약관심사과, ~ (2009)
  3. 곽윤직, "채권각론(민법각론Ⅳ)" (2003), 박영사
  4. 김동훈, "비전형계약의 이론과 판례", 법학논총, 9 (1997), 국민대학교 법학연 구소
  5. 김동훈, "전속계약 및 기타 무명계약", 주석민법(채권각칙), 5 (2002), 한국사법행 정학회
  6. 김보연, "영화스태프 처우 현황 및 개선방안 모색" (2010), 영화진흥위원회
  7. 박형섭, "2010년 영화산업 스태프 표준근로계약서 개발" (2010), 영화산 업협력위원회
  8. 박홍래, "손해배상액의 예정과 위약벌", 민사법연구, 9 (2001), 대한민사법학회
  9. 씨네21 편집부, "씨네 21" (2001)
  10. 남형두, "저작권법 주해" (2007), 박영사
  11. 윤석찬, "엔터테인먼트 산업에서의 계약법적 고찰-다양한 계약유형에 대한 고 찰을 중심으로", 법학연구, 46(1)통권 : 54 (2005), 부산대학교 법학 연구원
  12. 이은영, "채권각론" (2005), 박영사
  13. 이은영, "엔터테인먼트계약의 다양한 모습", 민사법학, (23) (2003), 한국민사법학회
  14. 2009년 영화스태프 근로환경실태조사, "이종수", 영화산업협 력위원회, ~ (2009)
  15. 임종률, "노동법 (제8판)" (2010), 박영사
  16. 장재옥, "專屬契約에 관한 小考- 연예인 전속매니지먼트계약을 중심으로", 중앙법학, 7(4), pp.197~228 (2005), 중앙법학회
  17. 김용섭, "스포츠엔터테인먼트법" (2010), 법문사
  18. 정경석, "엔터테인먼트 비즈니스 분쟁사례집" (2004), 청림출판
  19. 영화현장스탭의 근로조건개선과 전문성 향상을 위한 연구, "4부 조수연합", 영화진흥위원회, ~ (2004)
  20. 永野秀雄, "芸能実演家の『地位の向上』と特別立法", 労働法律旬報, 1537 (2002)
  21. 鎌田耕一, "契約労働者の概念と法的課題", 日本労働法学会誌, 102 (2003)
  22. 浜村 彰, "芸能 実演家の労働者性(特集・芸術と労働)", 日本 労働研究雑誌, 549 (2006)
  23. 日本芸能実演家団体協議会, "2005年 芸能 実演家の活動と生活実態調査", ~ (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)