채권자대위소송과 피보전채권
Subrogation Right of a Creditor and the Right belonging to the obligor
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Judicial decision views a person who is in charge of litigation as the subrogation right of a creditor whereas it views the rights belonging to the obligor as the standards of the condition of standing to sue. However, the current law separates procedural law from substantive law. In addition, the condition of lawful prosecution of procedural law and that of substantive law are distinguished. Therefore, the accumulated precedents which do not distinguish the differences between the two conditions could result in actio system. As a result, in spite the fact that the problems can be theoretically resolved as standing cases, chameleon-like cases where legal procedure laws are inappropriately applied has been increased. Instead, theories such as prohibition of double lawsuits or Re judicata are applied to the chameleon-like cases. Another point is that the condition of lawful prosecution is in theoretical dogma of ex-office. This has resulted in the denial of pleadings, the major principle of civil procedure act. Changes in the precedent theory are expected.
Abstract
Judicial decision views a person who is in charge of litigation as the subrogation right of a creditor whereas it views the rights belonging to the obligor as the standards of the condition of standing to sue. However, the current law separates procedural law from substantive law. In addition, the condition of lawful prosecution of procedural law and that of substantive law are distinguished. Therefore, the accumulated precedents which do not distinguish the differences between the two conditions could result in actio system. As a result, in spite the fact that the problems can be theoretically resolved as standing cases, chameleon-like cases where legal procedure laws are inappropriately applied has been increased. Instead, theories such as prohibition of double lawsuits or Re judicata are applied to the chameleon-like cases. Another point is that the condition of lawful prosecution is in theoretical dogma of ex-office. This has resulted in the denial of pleadings, the major principle of civil procedure act. Changes in the precedent theory are expected.
참고문헌 (25)
- 강현중, "민사소송법" (2004), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "민법주해(Ⅸ )" (2011), 박영사
- 김상원, "주석 신민사소송법(Ⅰ )", 국사법행정학회 (2003)
- 김용진, "민사소송법" (2006), 신영사
- 김홍엽, "민사소송법" (2011), 박영사
- 김홍규, "민사소송법" (2010), 삼영사
- 방순원, "민사소송법(상)", 한국사법행정학회 (1987)
- 오시영, "민사소송법" (2004), 학현사
- 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2010), 박영사
- 박익환, "민사소송법" (2008), 박영사
- 이영섭, "민사소송법(상)" (1980), 박영사
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2011), 박영사
- 전병서, "기본강의 민사소송법" (2010), 홍문사
- 전병서, (2007), 법문사
- 정영환, "신민사소송법" (2009), 세창출판사
- 한종렬, "민사소송법(상)" (1995), 대학출판사
- 호문혁, "민사소송법 제9판" (2011), 법문사
- auernig, "Zivilprozeßrecht, 27" (2002), C.H.Beck
- 범경철, "채권자대위소송의 실질적 보장과 중복소송", 경희법학, 45(4), pp.95~124 (2010), 법학연구소
- 원유석, "채권자대위소송에 있어서 피보전채권의 존부에 대한 판단기준", 박영사
- 오창수, "債權者代位訴訟의 실천적 의미 - 당사자의 지위 및 소송요건을 중심으로 -", 법과정책, 16(1), pp.125~167 (2010), 법과정책연구소
- 이동률, "채권자대위소송과 법정소송담당", 민사소송(Ⅱ) (1999), 한국민사소송법학회
- 이동률, "당사자적격의 이론적 발전과정", 법학연구, 15(1) (2004), 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 호문혁, "채권자대위소송에 있어서의 피보전채권과 당사자적격" (1991), 박영사
- 호문혁, "채권자대위소송과 중복제소" (1994), 박영사