납세자의 권리구제를 위한 심판청구제도의 합리적인 개선방안
A Study on Problems in the System of National Tax Appeal
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The administration should be based on the Constitution and laws, and it needs to establish a system to protect people’s rights and interests against illegal or unfair administration. Particularly in the case of tax administration grounded on the violation of personal interests, it is badly in need of the protection of taxpayers’ rights and interests. The taxpayer protection system has been operated on ex-post treatments, especially the system of national tax appeal. However, the system has not functioned for which it was set up due to various problems such as shortage of judges and investigators, insufficient professionalism, work congestion and delay caused by manpower shortage, insufficiency of quasi-judicial factors and otherwise. The followings show the problems in the system of national tax appeal and the solutions:First, it is advisable to so reorganize the Tax Tribunal that it may function as an extraordinary agency of the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, i.e., a tax system maker and executor. Second, it needs a wide expansion of the tax tribunal, along with the supply of human resources, in order to solve the problems such as manpower shortage, work congestion and delay. In addition, there is a need to set up a system to secure experts at proper time. Third, the tax commission should be reformed to secure the fairness and objectivity of decisions. Moreover, tax judges’ qualification, tenure, remuneration and identity should be made into a law, secondarily to the judiciary. In addition, a law should be enacted to call in experts such as professors, lawyers, tax accountants and certified public accountants at a reasonable remuneration. Furthermore, quasi-judicial factors should be more sufficiently reflected in the process of hearing and decision. Lastly, it needs to legally accept the re-audit system that is widely conducted for operational convenience, though it has not been based on the Framework Act on National Taxes, and by extension, to stipulate contestations concretely. The betterment of the national tax appeal-system is expected to solidify taxpayers’ rights and interests.
Abstract
The administration should be based on the Constitution and laws, and it needs to establish a system to protect people’s rights and interests against illegal or unfair administration. Particularly in the case of tax administration grounded on the violation of personal interests, it is badly in need of the protection of taxpayers’ rights and interests. The taxpayer protection system has been operated on ex-post treatments, especially the system of national tax appeal. However, the system has not functioned for which it was set up due to various problems such as shortage of judges and investigators, insufficient professionalism, work congestion and delay caused by manpower shortage, insufficiency of quasi-judicial factors and otherwise. The followings show the problems in the system of national tax appeal and the solutions:First, it is advisable to so reorganize the Tax Tribunal that it may function as an extraordinary agency of the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, i.e., a tax system maker and executor. Second, it needs a wide expansion of the tax tribunal, along with the supply of human resources, in order to solve the problems such as manpower shortage, work congestion and delay. In addition, there is a need to set up a system to secure experts at proper time. Third, the tax commission should be reformed to secure the fairness and objectivity of decisions. Moreover, tax judges’ qualification, tenure, remuneration and identity should be made into a law, secondarily to the judiciary. In addition, a law should be enacted to call in experts such as professors, lawyers, tax accountants and certified public accountants at a reasonable remuneration. Furthermore, quasi-judicial factors should be more sufficiently reflected in the process of hearing and decision. Lastly, it needs to legally accept the re-audit system that is widely conducted for operational convenience, though it has not been based on the Framework Act on National Taxes, and by extension, to stipulate contestations concretely. The betterment of the national tax appeal-system is expected to solidify taxpayers’ rights and interests.
참고문헌 (18)
- 감사원, "2011년 감사연보" (2012)
- 국세청, "2011 국세통계연보" (2011)
- 김범준, "조세심판제도의 실무적 개선방안과 입법론", 조세법연구, 15(1), pp.159~204 (2009), 한국세법학회
- 김영조, "주요선진국의 조세불복제도 연구", 한국조세연구포럼 (2005)
- 행정심판법의 개정방향, "김정순", 한국법제연구원, ~ (1995)
- 행정심판제도의 발전방안연구, "김정순", ~ (2002)
- 박종호, "소송전 납세자권리구제제도에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2007
- 배병윤, "조세심판제도의 개요와 현황", 월간법제 (2012), 법제처
- 서희열, "국세심판제도의 평가와 장단기 개편방안", 세무학연구, 22(3), pp.9~32 (2005), 한국세무학회
- 소순무, "조세소송" (2010), 영화조세통람
- 소순무, "전심기관 재조사결정의 세법적 좌표", 계간 세무사, (가을) (2010), 한국세무사회
- 조세구제제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구, "한상국", 한국조세연구원, ~ (2005)
- 金子宏, "租税法第十四版" (2009), 弘文堂
- 鈴木 潮, "国税不服審判所の意義と実態", 関西学院経済学研究, (37) (2006), 関西学院大学大学院経済学研究科研究会
- 長谷川 忠一, "国税不服審判所構想管見 : その審理裁決機関の独立性について", 駒澤大學經済學部研究紀要, (27) (1969), 駒澤大學
- "조세심판원 홈페이지"[URL]
- "해양안전심판원 홈페이지"[URL]
- "일본 국세불복심판소 홈페이지"[URL]
