본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

노후산업단지의 경쟁력강화제도

System for Strengthening Competitiveness of Decrepit Industrial Complex

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Law policy about industrial complex and management which made primary contribution to Korea's economic development which is role model in world history, should change in accordance to the industrial structure and characteristics of the time. Industrial complex which was made in order to push forward the economic development since the 1960s had played a pivotal role of Korea's manufacturing industry and had led economic growth as a major industries. As time goes by after the completion of construction, industrial structure had changed from the large-scale equipment industry to the small-scale and high-tech knowledge industry. Industrial complex needed change and response in accordance with this change, but because of the deterioration of infrastructure competitiveness of the complex is getting reduced. And it also raised urban problems like air-pollution, noise and traffic jam as industrial complex had incorporated into the city. Re-establishing an decrepit industrial complex to competitive industrial can be derived from one state's industry promotion project. Current "INDUSTRIAL SITES AND DEVELOPMENT ACT", "INDUSTRIAL CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT AND FACTORY ESTABLISHMENT ACT" and "SPECIAL ACT ON VITALIZATION AND STRENGTHENING COMPETITIVENESS OF DECREPIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX"(hereinafter referred to as the "DECREPIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ACT") involve Regeneration project system, Projects for upgrading structures of industrial complexs system, and Strengthening competitveness project system each, in order to revitalize decrepit industrial complex. But, Regeneration project and Projects for upgrading structures of industrial complexs deal with substantially same matter in different part of the system and legal basis, but in reality it shows similar way how to check and resolve the problem about decrepit industrial complex. During more than 20 years have elapsed after After ground was broken which decrepit industrial complex for strengthening competitiveness just as the industrial complex, The recently enacted DECREPIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ACT is limeted national industrial complex and industrial complex in general to main role of development and a healthy national economic development. DECREPIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ACT are looking to old age based industrial complex to concentrate the budget and the competence that the important role the reason for limiting the industrial complex as a target of strengthening competitiveness to the development of the national industry. In this respect Regeneration project and Projects for upgrading structures of industrial complexs due to “INDUSTRIAL SITES AND DEVELOPMENT ACT” and “INDUSTRIAL CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT AND FACTORY ESTABLISHMENT ACT” means in terms of the system that target the decrepit industrial complex that does not belong to the subject of DECREPIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ACT. In the long run, projects for strengthening competitiveness of industrial complex suited in terms of reunification of system and aspects the effective budget that allows it to be promoted as a unified DECREPIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ACT.

Abstract

Law policy about industrial complex and management which made primary contribution to Korea's economic development which is role model in world history, should change in accordance to the industrial structure and characteristics of the time. Industrial complex which was made in order to push forward the economic development since the 1960s had played a pivotal role of Korea's manufacturing industry and had led economic growth as a major industries. As time goes by after the completion of construction, industrial structure had changed from the large-scale equipment industry to the small-scale and high-tech knowledge industry. Industrial complex needed change and response in accordance with this change, but because of the deterioration of infrastructure competitiveness of the complex is getting reduced. And it also raised urban problems like air-pollution, noise and traffic jam as industrial complex had incorporated into the city. Re-establishing an decrepit industrial complex to competitive industrial can be derived from one state's industry promotion project. Current "INDUSTRIAL SITES AND DEVELOPMENT ACT", "INDUSTRIAL CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT AND FACTORY ESTABLISHMENT ACT" and "SPECIAL ACT ON VITALIZATION AND STRENGTHENING COMPETITIVENESS OF DECREPIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX"(hereinafter referred to as the "DECREPIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ACT") involve Regeneration project system, Projects for upgrading structures of industrial complexs system, and Strengthening competitveness project system each, in order to revitalize decrepit industrial complex. But, Regeneration project and Projects for upgrading structures of industrial complexs deal with substantially same matter in different part of the system and legal basis, but in reality it shows similar way how to check and resolve the problem about decrepit industrial complex. During more than 20 years have elapsed after After ground was broken which decrepit industrial complex for strengthening competitiveness just as the industrial complex, The recently enacted DECREPIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ACT is limeted national industrial complex and industrial complex in general to main role of development and a healthy national economic development. DECREPIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ACT are looking to old age based industrial complex to concentrate the budget and the competence that the important role the reason for limiting the industrial complex as a target of strengthening competitiveness to the development of the national industry. In this respect Regeneration project and Projects for upgrading structures of industrial complexs due to “INDUSTRIAL SITES AND DEVELOPMENT ACT” and “INDUSTRIAL CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT AND FACTORY ESTABLISHMENT ACT” means in terms of the system that target the decrepit industrial complex that does not belong to the subject of DECREPIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ACT. In the long run, projects for strengthening competitiveness of industrial complex suited in terms of reunification of system and aspects the effective budget that allows it to be promoted as a unified DECREPIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ACT.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. “지역산업 클러스터 정책의 최근 동향 및 이슈”, 과학기술 연구개발 사업 동향브리프, "강혜정", 한국과학기술기획평가원, ~ (2012)
  2. 산업단지 재정비 및 고도화 특별법 제정 연구, "김군수", 경기개발연구원, ~ (2009)
  3. 한국의 산업단지 혁신클러스터 ODA지원전략, "김세원", 산업연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서 2014-736 (2014)
  4. 김용창, "개발이익 환수제도 운영과정의 법적쟁점과 사법적 판단", 토지공법연구, 48, pp.269~296 (2010), 한국토지공법학회
  5. 김종경, "산업단지 구조고도화사업 개발이익 산정방식에 관한 연구", 부동산학연구, 19(1), pp.97~115 (2013), 한국부동산분석학회
  6. 박영삼, "노후 산단을 스마트 혁신 산업단지로 재창조", KIET 산업경제 (2014), 산업연구원
  7. 백한열, "에를랑겐 산업부지의 첨단 연구 도시로의 재생", 건축과 도시공간, 17 (2015), 건축도시공간연구소
  8. 클러스터, 클러스터 정책의 이론, 쟁점 및 사례검토, "윤진호", 한국산업기술재단, ~ (2008)
  9. 이우재, "개발이익 환수를 위한 지가산정 시 적용 기준 및 개선방안 연구", 부동산연구, 24(4), pp.207~224 (2014), 한국부동산연구원
  10. 이종영, "토지개발과 지역산업보호", 토지공법연구, 17, pp.3~66 (2003), 한국토지공법학회
  11. 임윤수, "개발이익환수제도 개선방안- 기부채납을 중심으로 -", 가천법학, 7(1), pp.189~208 (2014), 법학연구소
  12. 산업단지 기반시설의 효율적 지원방안 연구, "장철순", 국토연구원, ~ (2011)
  13. 정종대, "정비기반시설 무상귀속의 공법적 문제", 석사, pp.2015
  14. 조병구, "개발이익 배제 원칙에 대한 소고", 법경제학연구, 9(2), pp.193~222 (2012), 한국법경제학회
  15. 2011 경제발전경험모듈화사업: 산업단지 개발전략과 운영사례, "조혜영", 한국산업단지공단, ~ (2012)
  16. 최종권, "현행 도시계획의 분류와 도시계획의 개념 정립", 토지공법연구, 69, pp.21~42 (2015), 한국토지공법학회
  17. 최준석, "노후산업단지 실태분석과 시사점 -산업혁신부문 진단을 중심으로-", KIET 산업경제 (2015), 산업연구원
  18. ‘산업단지활력지수’ 산출을 통한 노후산업단지 경쟁력강화 방안 -혁신잠재력과 기반인프라를 중심으로-, "허문구", 산업연구원, ~, pp.ISSUE PAPER 2012-289 (2012)
  19. Federwisch. Ch, "Zu den Grenzen städtebaulicher Sanierungskonzepte - Behutsame Stadterneuerung ohne Verdrängungsschutz?", NVwZ, pp.1035~ (2003)
  20. Hagedorn. W, "Ausgleichsbeträge in Sanierungsgebieten nach §§ 153–155 BauGB – Bescheide, Widersprüche und Bodenwerte", NVwZ, pp.1239~ (2011)
  21. Herz. B, "Die Haftung für den Ausgleichsbetrag nach § 154 BauGB in der Immobilientransaktion", ZfBR, pp.19~ (2014)
  22. Partsch. Ch.J, "Die Vertreibung der Investoren aus den Sanierungsgebieten", NVwZ, pp.139~ (1997)
  23. Schindhelm. M, "Der Ausgleichsbetrag für sanierungsbedingte Bodenwertsteigerungen nach § 154 BauGB", NVwZ, pp.747~ (1992)
  24. Schlick. W, "Die Rechtsprechung des BGH zu den öffentlich-rechtlichen Ersatzleistungen – Öffentlich-rechtliche Entschädigung", NJW, pp.3137~ (2011)
  25. Schmidt-Eichstaedt. G, "Zum Verhältnis von Sanierungszielen und Bebauungsplänen", ZfBR, pp.13~ (2001)
  26. Schröer. Th, "Milieuschutz – auch für Besserverdienende?", NZBau, pp.404~ (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)