언어사용역을 고려한 영한 수량표현 번역
English-to-Korean Translation on Numeral Expression
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The English and Korean languages use very different systems for expressing quantified structures. In English, only two structures exist. These two pre-structures (i.e. ‘quantifier+N’) dominate the enumeration process in the English language. In Korean, there are six structures of pre- and post-structures (i.e. ‘N+quantifier’). The general structures are ‘number+unit+(ui)+noun’ (pre-structure) and ‘noun+number+unit’(post-structure). While English countable nouns escape unit nouns, nearly all Korean nouns need ones. Hence, translators must choose between pre-structure and post-structure, and one appropriate numeral unit. This study investigates: (1) the relationship between a text type and its preference for quantified structures, and (2) the elements affecting the degree of acceptability of the numeral units. We have selected data from experimental articles, newspapers, TV news scripts, and novels. These show a strong correlation between a text type(mode of discourse) and its preferred quantified structure. They also give evidence that the field and the tenor of discourse affect the selection of the appropriate numeral unit words.
Abstract
The English and Korean languages use very different systems for expressing quantified structures. In English, only two structures exist. These two pre-structures (i.e. ‘quantifier+N’) dominate the enumeration process in the English language. In Korean, there are six structures of pre- and post-structures (i.e. ‘N+quantifier’). The general structures are ‘number+unit+(ui)+noun’ (pre-structure) and ‘noun+number+unit’(post-structure). While English countable nouns escape unit nouns, nearly all Korean nouns need ones. Hence, translators must choose between pre-structure and post-structure, and one appropriate numeral unit. This study investigates: (1) the relationship between a text type and its preference for quantified structures, and (2) the elements affecting the degree of acceptability of the numeral units. We have selected data from experimental articles, newspapers, TV news scripts, and novels. These show a strong correlation between a text type(mode of discourse) and its preferred quantified structure. They also give evidence that the field and the tenor of discourse affect the selection of the appropriate numeral unit words.
참고문헌 (16)
- 강범모, "한국어의 텍스트 장르, 문체, 유형" (2000), 태학사
- 김영희, "셈숱말 옮기기", 배달말, 7(1), pp.33~60 (1981)
- 김영희, "한국어 셈숱화 구문의 통사론" (1984), 탑출판사
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1994), 뿌리깊은나
- 우형식, "국어 수량화 구성의 분포와 기능 분석", 담화와 인지, 5(2), pp.57~80 (1998)
- 채 완, "국어수량사구의 통시적 고찰: 어순변화의 일례로서", 진단학보, 53(54), pp.155~170 (1982)
- 채 완, "국어 수사 및 수량사구의 유형적 고찰", 어학연구, 19(1), pp.19~34 (1983)
- 채 완, "국어 분류사의 기능과 의미", 진단학보, 70, pp.167~180 (1990)
- 한효석, "이렇게 해야 바로 쓴다" (2000), 한겨레신문사
- Denny, J., "What Are Noun Classifiers Good for? CLS", Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting, pp.122~132 (1976)
- Gregory, M., "Language and Situation: Language Varieties and their Social Contexts" (1978), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Halliday, M., "The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching" (1964), Longman
- Hatim, B., "Discourse and the Translator" (1990), Longman
- Lyons, J., "Semantics 2" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Reiss, K., "Text types, translation types and translation assessment", pp.105~115 (1989)
- Snell-Hornby, M., "Translation Studies-An Integrated Approach" (1995), John Benjamins Publishing Company