본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Teaching intonation of four English interrogative sentence types using audio-visual pitchtracks

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study provides the result of an experiment to measure the effectiveness of teaching English intonation patterns to Korean college students. The experiment was done with four different types of interrogative sentences: structures ending with a grammatical word, questions with an imbedded sentence, either-or questions, and questions with an intermediate rise or fall. The subjects were explicitly taught using the tape recorder, visually overridden intonation marks, and computer-generated intonation contours. Eight subjects were selected from three different general English levels: high intermediate, low intermediate, and low, and they practiced 164 sentences in four different test lists. After the ten weeks of practice and teaching, the subjects showed a noticeable development in performance. The analysis is based on 36 sentences in the four different question types. The pretest from the subjects and previous general survey showed a very low performance (15-59%), but the post-test of the subjects showed a significantly improved production (63-96%). In the pretest, there were different production abilities among the subjects of different levels of English ability, but in the post-test, no such notable differences were found. The levels of difficulty or easiness were found among the four different interrogative structures. Close-choice (Either-Or) questions are the easiest to learn, questions with final grammatical words are the next, questions with an embedded sentence come next, and questions with a non-final rise or fall intonation are the most difficult.

Abstract

This study provides the result of an experiment to measure the effectiveness of teaching English intonation patterns to Korean college students. The experiment was done with four different types of interrogative sentences: structures ending with a grammatical word, questions with an imbedded sentence, either-or questions, and questions with an intermediate rise or fall. The subjects were explicitly taught using the tape recorder, visually overridden intonation marks, and computer-generated intonation contours. Eight subjects were selected from three different general English levels: high intermediate, low intermediate, and low, and they practiced 164 sentences in four different test lists. After the ten weeks of practice and teaching, the subjects showed a noticeable development in performance. The analysis is based on 36 sentences in the four different question types. The pretest from the subjects and previous general survey showed a very low performance (15-59%), but the post-test of the subjects showed a significantly improved production (63-96%). In the pretest, there were different production abilities among the subjects of different levels of English ability, but in the post-test, no such notable differences were found. The levels of difficulty or easiness were found among the four different interrogative structures. Close-choice (Either-Or) questions are the easiest to learn, questions with final grammatical words are the next, questions with an embedded sentence come next, and questions with a non-final rise or fall intonation are the most difficult.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. AVERY, PETER, "Teaching American English Pronunciation" (1992), Oxford University Press
  2. CELCE-MURCIA, "Teaching Pronunciation" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  3. CHOI, YEON-HEE, "Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction of English Intonation on Korean College Students", English Teaching, 52(1), pp.107~133 (1997)
  4. CRAWFORD, WILLIAM W, "The Pronunciation Monitor: L2 Acquisition Considerations and Pedagogical Priorities Current Perspectives on Pronunciation: Practices Anchored in Theory", pp.101~121 (1987), TESOL, Inc
  5. GILBERT, JUDY B, "Clear Speech: Pronunciation and Listening Comprehension in North American English, 2nd Ed" (1993), Cambridge University Press
  6. 전지현, "교실 상황에서 영어 명사구의 초점 실현 양상", 음성과학, 9(2), pp.109~132 (2002), 한국음성학회
  7. 강선미, "영어 화제와 초점의 억양 실현 양상", 음성과학, 10(4), pp.41~56 (2003), 한국음성학회
  8. 김희성, "동사구 생략에서의 초점억양 실현양상", 음성과학, 9(3), pp.237~250 (2002), 한국음성학회
  9. 김화영, "영어 의문문의 문미 억양 실현 양상과 의미 해석에 관한 연구", 음성과학, 10(2), pp.319~332 (2003), 한국음성학회
  10. 김화영, "영어 자동사 문장에서의 초점 실현 양상에 관한 연구", 음성과학, 9(3), pp.251~266 (2002), 한국음성학회
  11. KIM, KEE-HO, "The Analysis of Intonational Meaning Based on the English Intonational Phonology", Speech Sciences, 7(3), pp.109~125 (2000)
  12. KOO, HEE-SAN, "A Phonetic Study on English Intonation by Koreans", English Education, 42, pp.89~105 (1991)
  13. KIM, SO-HEE, "A Comparative Study on English Intonation of Focused Sentences between Korean and English Native Speakers", Speech Sciences, 9(2), pp.89~105 (2002)
  14. LEE, JOO-KYEONG, "Edge Tones of English Conditional Clauses and an Intonational Contribution to Discourse Interpretation", Speech Sciences, 8(2), pp.149~163 (2001)
  15. MORLEY, JOAN, "Current Perspectives on Pronunciation: Practices Anchored in Theory" (1987), TESOL, Inc
  16. MORLEY, JOAN, "Pronunciation Pedagogy and Theory: New Views, New Directions" (1994), TESOL, Inc
  17. OH, SEI-POONG, "A Study on the Intonation of Korean Speakers in English Sentence Adverbials", Speech Sciences, 8(2), pp.119~131 (2001)
  18. PARK, JAE-ICK, "English Intonation of Interrogative Sentences with Various Syntactic Structures. Studies in Phonetics", Phonology and Morphology, 10(2), pp.225~240 (2004)
  19. Native Speakers’ High-Low Range Differences in F0 and Its Role in Pronunciation Assessment, "Speech Sciences", 93~103
  20. UM, HYE-YOUNG, "Korean Speakers Realization of Focus and Information Structure on English Intonation in Comparison with English Native Speakers", Speech Sciences, 8(2), pp.133~148 (2001)
  21. 유혜옥, "프랑스엉 억양구조에서 중간구의 음성적 실현 양상", 음성과학, 9(3), pp.185~200 (2002), 한국음성학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)